Unequal a priori probability multiple hypothesis testing in space domain awareness with the space surveillance telescope.

This paper investigates the ability to improve Space Domain Awareness (SDA) by increasing the number of detectable Resident Space Objects (RSOs) from space surveillance sensors. With matched filter based techniques, the expected impulse response, or Point Spread Function (PSF), is compared against the received data. In the situation where the images are spatially undersampled, the modeled PSF may not match the received data if the RSO does not fall in the center of the pixel. This aliasing can be accounted for with a Multiple Hypothesis Test (MHT). Previously, proposed MHTs have implemented a test with an equal a priori prior probability assumption. This paper investigates using an unequal a priori probability MHT. To determine accurate a priori probabilities, three metrics are computed; they are correlation, physical distance, and empirical. Using the calculated a priori probabilities, a new algorithm is developed, and images from the Space Surveillance Telescope (SST) are analyzed. The number of detected objects by both an equal and unequal prior probabilities are compared while keeping the false alarm rate constant. Any additional number of detected objects will help improve SDA capabilities.

[1]  Peter S. Gural,et al.  Matched Filter Processing for Asteroid Detection , 2005 .

[2]  P. Lahiri,et al.  On measures of uncertainty of empirical Bayes small-area estimators , 2003 .

[3]  Glenn Healey,et al.  Radiometric CCD camera calibration and noise estimation , 1994, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[4]  Stephen C. Cain,et al.  Characterizing Point Spread Function (PSF) fluctuations to improve Resident Space Object detection (RSO) , 2015, Defense + Security Symposium.

[5]  Stephen C. Cain,et al.  IMPROVING THE SPACE SURVEILLANCE TELESCOPE'S PERFORMANCE USING MULTI-HYPOTHESIS TESTING , 2014 .

[6]  S. Paulin-Henriksson,et al.  Optimal PSF modelling for weak lensing : complexity and sparsity , 2009, 0901.3557.

[7]  E. Bertin,et al.  SExtractor: Software for source extraction , 1996 .

[8]  Richard Lippmann,et al.  Neural Network Classifiers Estimate Bayesian a posteriori Probabilities , 1991, Neural Computation.

[9]  Siamak Khorram,et al.  Hierarchical maximum-likelihood classification for improved accuracies , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[10]  Donald E. Knuth Two notes on notation , 1992 .

[11]  M.A. Neifeld,et al.  Adaptive Waveform Design and Sequential Hypothesis Testing for Target Recognition With Active Sensors , 2007, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[12]  R. V. Willstrop,et al.  The Mersenne–Schmidt: a three-mirror survey telescope , 1984 .

[13]  Jonathan E. Fieldsend,et al.  Multi-class ROC analysis from a multi-objective optimisation perspective , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[14]  Travis Blake,et al.  Improving space domain awareness through unequal-cost multiple hypothesis testing in the space surveillance telescope. , 2015, Applied optics.

[15]  R. Noll Zernike polynomials and atmospheric turbulence , 1976 .

[16]  Tod R. Lauer,et al.  Combining Undersampled Dithered Images , 1999 .

[17]  S. C. Pohlig,et al.  An algorithm for detection of moving optical targets , 1989 .