Cisplatin DNA damage and repair maps of the human genome at single-nucleotide resolution

Significance The chemotherapy drug cisplatin kills cancer cells by damaging their DNA. It has been used for treating a variety of cancer types for almost four decades. Although the drug is generally effective, it has strong adverse side effects, and some cancers exhibit or, after initial favorable response, develop drug resistance. The mechanism of drug resistance is multifactorial and involves the ability of cancer cells to repair the cisplatin-induced DNA damages. We have developed methods to map the sites of cisplatin damage and its repair for the entire human genome at single-nucleotide resolution. These methods can be used to study cancer sensitivity and resistance to the drugs, and to identify new strategies for efficient combination therapies. Cisplatin is a major anticancer drug that kills cancer cells by damaging their DNA. Cancer cells cope with the drug by removal of the damages with nucleotide excision repair. We have developed methods to measure cisplatin adduct formation and its repair at single-nucleotide resolution. “Damage-seq” relies on the replication-blocking properties of the bulky base lesions to precisely map their location. “XR-seq” independently maps the removal of these damages by capturing and sequencing the excised oligomer released during repair. The damage and repair maps we generated reveal that damage distribution is essentially uniform and is dictated mostly by the underlying sequence. In contrast, cisplatin repair is heterogeneous in the genome and is affected by multiple factors including transcription and chromatin states. Thus, the overall effect of damages in the genome is primarily driven not by damage formation but by the repair efficiency. The combination of the Damage-seq and XR-seq methods has the potential for developing novel cancer therapeutic strategies.

[1]  Katie E. Evans,et al.  Global genome nucleotide excision repair is organized into domains that promote efficient DNA repair in chromatin , 2016, Genome research.

[2]  John J. Wyrick,et al.  Chromosomal landscape of UV damage formation and repair at single-nucleotide resolution , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Anushi Shah,et al.  Differential DNA repair underlies mutation hotspots at active promoters in cancer genomes , 2016, Nature.

[4]  J. Lieb,et al.  Genome-wide kinetics of DNA excision repair in relation to chromatin state and mutagenesis , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Radhakrishnan Sabarinathan,et al.  Nucleotide excision repair is impaired by binding of transcription factors to DNA , 2015, Nature.

[6]  J. Lieb,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of human global and transcription-coupled excision repair of UV damage at single-nucleotide resolution , 2015, Genes & development.

[7]  Katie E. Evans,et al.  3D-DIP-Chip: a microarray-based method to measure genomic DNA damage , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[8]  Björn Usadel,et al.  Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data , 2014, Bioinform..

[9]  John J. Wyrick,et al.  High-resolution characterization of CPD hotspot formation in human fibroblasts , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  Robert Gentleman,et al.  Software for Computing and Annotating Genomic Ranges , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[11]  Zhaoyu Li,et al.  DANPOS: Dynamic analysis of nucleosome position and occupancy by sequencing , 2013, Genome research.

[12]  Data production leads,et al.  An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome , 2012 .

[13]  ENCODEConsortium,et al.  An Integrated Encyclopedia of DNA Elements in the Human Genome , 2012, Nature.

[14]  Marcel Martin Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads , 2011 .

[15]  Timothy J. Durham,et al.  "Systematic" , 1966, Comput. J..

[16]  Mark Bennett,et al.  A novel method for the genome-wide high resolution analysis of DNA damage , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[17]  Cole Trapnell,et al.  Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. , 2010, Nature biotechnology.

[18]  Aaron R. Quinlan,et al.  Bioinformatics Applications Note Genome Analysis Bedtools: a Flexible Suite of Utilities for Comparing Genomic Features , 2022 .

[19]  Cole Trapnell,et al.  Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome , 2009, Genome Biology.

[20]  P. Hanawalt,et al.  Transcription-coupled DNA repair: two decades of progress and surprises , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[21]  M. Gottesman,et al.  The role of cellular accumulation in determining sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy. , 2008, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[22]  L. Kèlland,et al.  The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy , 2007, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[23]  J. Schellens,et al.  Adduct-specific monoclonal antibodies for the measurement of cisplatin-induced DNA lesions in individual cell nuclei , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[24]  Dong Wang,et al.  Cellular processing of platinum anticancer drugs , 2005, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[25]  Dong Wang,et al.  Nucleotide excision repair from site-specifically platinum-modified nucleosomes. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[26]  J. Turchi,et al.  Effect of DNA polymerases and high mobility group protein 1 on the carrier ligand specificity for translesion synthesis past platinum-DNA adducts. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[27]  S. Chaney,et al.  Efficient nucleotide excision repair of cisplatin, oxaliplatin, and Bis-aceto-ammine-dichloro-cyclohexylamine-platinum(IV) (JM216) platinum intrastrand DNA diadducts. , 1999, Cancer research.

[28]  S. Lippard,et al.  Structure, Recognition, and Processing of Cisplatin-DNA Adducts. , 1999, Chemical reviews.

[29]  Richard D. Wood,et al.  Nucleotide Excision Repair in Mammalian Cells* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[30]  S. Lippard,et al.  Repair of cisplatin--DNA adducts by the mammalian excision nuclease. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[31]  S. Lippard,et al.  HMG-domain proteins specifically inhibit the repair of the major DNA adduct of the anticancer drug cisplatin by human excision nuclease. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  M. Tang,et al.  NUCLEOTIDE EXCISION REPAIR , 1993, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[33]  A. Sancar,et al.  Human nucleotide excision nuclease removes thymine dimers from DNA by incising the 22nd phosphodiester bond 5' and the 6th phosphodiester bond 3' to the photodimer. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  P. Hanawalt,et al.  Selective removal of transcription-blocking DNA damage from the transcribed strand of the mammalian DHFR gene , 1987, Cell.

[35]  J. Hesselberth,et al.  High-Resolution Mapping of Modified DNA Nucleobases Using Excision Repair Enzymes. , 2018, Methods in molecular biology.

[36]  A. Sancar,et al.  Nucleotide Excision Repair in Human Cells: Fate of the Excised Oligonucleotide Carrying DNA Damage In Vivo* , 2013 .