Randomized, controlled histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of implants with nanometer-scale calcium phosphate added to the dual acid-etched surface in the human posterior maxilla.

BACKGROUND Placement of dental implants in the posterior maxilla has been associated with higher rates of failure that are due, in part, to the poor bone quality of this region. The purpose of the present study was the histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of the bone around a new implant surface treatment created by a deposition of nanometer-sized calcium phosphate particles added to the dual acid-etched surface. METHODS One custom-made 2 x 10-mm site evaluation implant (SEI) with this novel treatment surface (test) and one SEI with the dual acid-etched surface without treatment (control) were placed in the posterior maxilla of 15 patients. All SEIs were retrieved after 2 months and evaluated under confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and by light microscopy for histomorphometric analysis of the bone-implant contact (BIC). RESULTS Histologic observations in control SEIs showed formation of new bone around the implant surface; however, it was not always in direct contact with the entire perimeter of the threads. The mean BIC was 19% +/- 14.2%. Test SEIs showed peri-implant bone tightly contacting the implant surface and better adapted to the threads. Three-dimensional reconstruction of sections obtained using CLSM showed the intimacy of the contact between bone and test SEI surface through the entire thickness of the specimens. The mean BIC was 32.2% +/- 18.5%. CONCLUSIONS After 2 months of healing, comparison of the BIC values showed a statistically significant greater mean BIC for test SEIs than for controls. The clinical implications of these results included shortening of the implant healing period and earlier loading protocols.

[1]  S. Tosatti,et al.  Enhanced bone apposition around biofunctionalized sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. , 2006, Clinical oral implants research.

[2]  J. Lan,et al.  The effect of combination of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 and basic fibroblast growth factor or insulin-like growth factor-I on dental implant osseointegration by confocal laser scanning microscopy. , 2006, Journal of periodontology.

[3]  U. Wikesjö,et al.  Bone-implant contact at calcium phosphate-coated and porous titanium oxide (TiUnite)-modified oral implants. , 2005, Clinical oral implants research.

[4]  A. Piattelli,et al.  Bone response to submerged, unloaded implants inserted in poor bone sites: a histological and histomorphometrical study of 8 titanium implants retrieved from man. , 2005, The Journal of oral implantology.

[5]  C. V. van Blitterswijk,et al.  Bone tissue engineering on amorphous carbonated apatite and crystalline octacalcium phosphate-coated titanium discs. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[6]  J. Ong,et al.  In vivo evaluation of hydroxyapatite coatings of different crystallinities. , 2005, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[7]  D Buser,et al.  What is This? Downloaded from jdr.sagepub.com at PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV on February 23, 2013 For personal use only. No other uses without permission. International and American Associations for Dental ResearchRESEARCH REPORTS , 2004 .

[8]  M. Hürzeler,et al.  Osseotite vs. machined surface in poor bone quality. A study in dogs. , 2003, Clinical oral implants research.

[9]  J. Davies,et al.  Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. , 2003, Journal of dental education.

[10]  T. Testori,et al.  Bone-implant contact on machined and dual acid-etched surfaces after 2 months of healing in the human maxilla. , 2003, Journal of periodontology.

[11]  S. Kohles,et al.  A Meta-Analysis Examining the Clinical Survivability of Machined-Surfaced and Osseotite Implants in Poor-Quality Bone , 2003, Implant dentistry.

[12]  P. Trisi,et al.  Bone-implant contact and bone quality: evaluation of expected and actual bone contact on machined and osseotite implant surfaces. , 2002, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[13]  J. Michel,et al.  A prospective multicenter evaluation of 1,583 3i implants: 1- to 5-year data. , 2002, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[14]  A. Piattelli,et al.  Bone response to machined and resorbable blast material titanium implants: an experimental study in rabbits. , 2002, The Journal of oral implantology.

[15]  J. Gunsolley,et al.  A multi-center study comparing dual acid-etched and machined-surfaced implants in various bone qualities. , 2001, Journal of periodontology.

[16]  R. Nishimura,et al.  Early endosseous integration enhanced by dual acid etching of titanium: a torque removal study in the rabbit. , 2001, Clinical oral implants research.

[17]  A Scarano,et al.  Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia. , 2000, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[18]  G. Tepper,et al.  Characteristic features of trabecular bone in edentulous mandibles. , 1999, Clinical oral implants research.

[19]  D. Cochran,et al.  A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces. , 1999, Journal of periodontology.

[20]  C. Watson,et al.  Implants: A 3 to 4 year study of single tooth hydroxylapatite coated endosseous dental implants , 1999, British Dental Journal.

[21]  T. Testori,et al.  A human histologic analysis of osseotite and machined surfaces using implants with 2 opposing surfaces. , 1999, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[22]  P. Trisi,et al.  Bone classification: clinical-histomorphometric comparison. , 1999, Clinical oral implants research.

[23]  J. Ong,et al.  Osteoblast precursor cell activity on HA surfaces of different treatments. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[24]  K. Suzuki,et al.  Effects of surface roughness of titanium implants on bone remodeling activity of femur in rabbits. , 1997, Bone.

[25]  A. Scarano,et al.  High-precision, cost-effective cutting system for producing thin sections of oral tissues containing dental implants. , 1997, Biomaterials.

[26]  J. Kent,et al.  Hydroxyapatite-coated cylindrical implants in the posterior mandible: 10-year observations. , 1996, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[27]  Ann Wennerberg,et al.  A histomorghometric study of screw‐shaped and removal torque titanium implants with three different surface topographies , 1995 .

[28]  P. Glantz,et al.  Clinical and radiographical features of submerged and nonsubmerged titanium implants. , 1994, Clinical oral implants research.

[29]  A. Holmen,et al.  Histomorphometric and removal torque analysis for TiO2-blasted titanium implants. An experimental study on dogs. , 1992, Clinical oral implants research.

[30]  D Buser,et al.  Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. , 1991, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[31]  C. Misch Classifications and treatment options of the completely edentulous arch in implant dentistry. , 1990, Dentistry today.

[32]  P. Trisi,et al.  Human histologic and histomorphometric analyses of hydroxyapatite-coated implants after 10 years of function: a case report. , 2005, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[33]  E. McGlumphy,et al.  Prospective study of 429 hydroxyapatite-coated cylindric omniloc implants placed in 121 patients. , 2003, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[34]  Tadashi Kokubo,et al.  Structural dependence of apatite formation on titania gels in a simulated body fluid. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[35]  K. Donath,et al.  Characteristic features of trabecular bone in edentulous maxillae. , 1999, Clinical oral implants research.

[36]  M. Rohrer,et al.  Postmortem histologic evaluation of mandibular titanium and maxillary hydroxyapatite-coated implants from 1 patient. , 1999, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[37]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. , 1995, Clinical oral implants research.

[38]  R. Jaffin,et al.  The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis. , 1991, Journal of periodontology.