Probabilistic, positional averaging predicts object-level crowding effects with letter-like stimuli.

We investigated how crowding-a breakdown in object recognition that occurs in the presence of nearby distracting clutter-works for complex letter-like stimuli. Subjects reported the orientation (up/down/left/right) of a T target, abutted by a single flanker composed of randomly positioned horizontal and vertical bars. In addition to familiar retinotopic anisotropies (e.g., more crowding from more eccentric flankers), we report three object-centered anisotropies. First, inversions of the target element were rare: errors included twice as many ±90° as 180° target rotations. Second, flankers were twice as intrusive when they lay above or below (end-flanking) compared to left or right (side-flanking) of an upright T target (an effect that holds under global rotation of the target-flanker pair). Third, end flankers induce subjects to make erroneous reports that resemble the flanker (producing a structured pattern of errors), but errors induced by side flankers do not (instead producing random errors). A model based on probabilistic weighted averaging of the feature positions within contours can account for these effects. Thus, we demonstrate a set of seemingly "high-level" object-centered crowding effects that can arise from "low-level" interactions between the features of letter-like elements.

[1]  R. Watt,et al.  Biological "bar codes" in human faces. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[2]  M. Herzog,et al.  Crowding in multi-element arrays: Regularity of spacing , 2010 .

[3]  Steven C. Dakin,et al.  Crowding Changes Appearance , 2010, Current Biology.

[4]  D. Pelli,et al.  Are faces processed like words? A diagnostic test for recognition by parts. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[5]  Ingo Rentschler,et al.  Loss of spatial phase relationships in extrafoveal vision , 1985, Nature.

[6]  David Whitney,et al.  Holistic crowding of Mooney faces. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[7]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[8]  R. Hess,et al.  Ladder contours are undetectable in the periphery: a crowding effect? , 2007, Journal of vision.

[9]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness , 1996, Nature.

[10]  D. Levi Crowding—An essential bottleneck for object recognition: A mini-review , 2008, Vision Research.

[11]  D. Pelli,et al.  The uncrowded window of object recognition , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  Dov Sagi,et al.  Configuration influence on crowding. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[13]  H. J. Rauder Reference repulision when judging the direction of visual motion , 1998 .

[14]  J. Lund,et al.  Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[16]  M. Morgan,et al.  Crowding and the tilt illusion: toward a unified account. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[17]  D. Levi,et al.  The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafovea , 1992, Vision Research.

[18]  H. Strasburger Unfocused spatial attention underlies the crowding effect in indirect form vision. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[19]  Anke Huckauf,et al.  What various kinds of errors tell us about lateral masking effects , 2002 .

[20]  S. Klein,et al.  Sampling in spatial vision , 1986, Nature.

[21]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Reference Repulsion When Judging the Direction of Visual Motion , 1998, Perception.

[22]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Equivalent intrinsic blur in spatial vision , 1990, Vision Research.

[23]  G Wolford,et al.  Perturbation model for letter identification. , 1975, Psychological review.

[24]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  The extent of crowding in peripheral vision does not scale with target size , 2002, Vision Research.

[25]  M. Morgan,et al.  Efficiency of locating centres of dot-clusters by human observers , 1991, Vision Research.

[26]  S. Dakin,et al.  Spatial interference among moving targets , 2005, Vision Research.

[27]  R. J. Watt,et al.  Towards a general theory of the visual acuities for shape and spatial arrangement , 1984, Vision Research.

[28]  M. Morgan,et al.  Strong tilt illusions always reduce orientation acuity , 2009, Vision Research.

[29]  H. Wilson,et al.  Lateral interactions in peripherally viewed texture arrays. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[30]  Frans W Cornelissen,et al.  On the generality of crowding: visual crowding in size, saturation, and hue compared to orientation. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[31]  E. Louie,et al.  Holistic crowding: selective interference between configural representations of faces in crowded scenes. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[32]  R. Watt Scanning from coarse to fine spatial scales in the human visual system after the onset of a stimulus. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[33]  J. Cass,et al.  Dissociable effects of attention and crowding on orientation averaging. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[34]  D. Pelli Crowding: a cortical constraint on object recognition , 2008, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[35]  D. Burr,et al.  Visual Clutter Causes High-Magnitude Errors , 2006, PLoS biology.

[36]  Y. Petrov,et al.  Crowding is directed to the fovea and preserves only feature contrast. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[37]  H. BOUMA,et al.  Interaction Effects in Parafoveal Letter Recognition , 1970, Nature.

[38]  R F Hess,et al.  Contour integration and scale combination processes in visual edge detection. , 1999, Spatial vision.

[39]  Stefano Baldassi,et al.  Non-linear integration of crowded orientation signals , 2008, Vision Research.

[40]  M C FLOM,et al.  Contour Interaction and Visual Resolution: Contralateral Effects , 1963, Science.

[41]  David J. Field,et al.  Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field” , 1993, Vision Research.

[42]  D. Levi,et al.  The effect of similarity and duration on spatial interaction in peripheral vision. , 1994, Spatial vision.

[43]  S. Dakin,et al.  Grouping local directional signals into moving contours , 2003, Vision Research.

[44]  Steven C Dakin,et al.  Positional averaging explains crowding with letter-like stimuli , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  J. Movshon,et al.  A new perceptual illusion reveals mechanisms of sensory decoding , 2007, Nature.

[46]  Melanie M.U. Akau,et al.  The mechanism of word crowding , 2010, Vision Research.

[47]  I. Rentschler,et al.  Contrast thresholds for identification of numeric characters in direct and eccentric view , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[48]  Steven C. Dakin,et al.  Absence of contour linking in peripheral vision , 1997, Nature.

[49]  Robert F. Hess,et al.  The coding of spatial position by the human visual system: Effects of spatial scale and retinal eccentricity , 1994, Vision Research.

[50]  Anirvan S. Nandy,et al.  The nature of letter crowding as revealed by first- and second-order classification images. , 2007, Journal of Vision.

[51]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[52]  G Chastain,et al.  Confusability and interference between members of parafoveal letter pairs , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[53]  S. Dakin,et al.  The shape and size of crowding for moving targets , 2003, Vision Research.

[54]  M. Morgan,et al.  Stochastic re-calibration: contextual effects on perceived tilt , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[55]  M. Banks,et al.  The effects of contrast, spatial scale, and orientation on foveal and peripheral phase discrimination , 1991, Vision Research.