Multiagent systems for cardiac pacing simulation and control

Simulating and controlling physiological phenomena are complex tasks to tackle. This is due to the fact that physiological processes are usually described by a set of partial models representing specific aspects of the phenomena and their adoption does not allow the achievement of an effective simulation/control system. A current open issue is the development of techniques able to comprehensively describe a phenomenon exploiting partial models. Simulation and control heavily rely on accurate modelling of physiological systems. In addition, since a large number of partial models of a single physiological phenomenon have been proposed over the years, the evaluation of their effectiveness and of their combinations is a fundamental task. In this paper we propose a multiagent paradigm, called anthropic agency, as a flexible tool to support and evaluate the combination of partial models embedded in agents. We present an agent negotiation paradigm, that improves the one we employed in our previous applications, as a flexible approach to combine optimally the partial models. We formally describe the negotiation protocol and we embed it in a FIPA agent interaction protocol. Furthermore, as an example of practical application, we describe how our paradigm can be a potential solution to the problem of adaptive cardiac pacing. Finally, we experimentally evaluate our approach and we discuss its properties and peculiarities.

[1]  S. Syverud,et al.  Cardiac pacing. , 1988, Emergency medicine clinics of North America.

[2]  Victor R. Lesser,et al.  Cooperative negotiation for soft real-time distributed resource allocation , 2003, AAMAS '03.

[3]  John Bigham,et al.  Cooperative negotiation in a multi-agent system for real-time load balancing of a mobile cellular network , 2003, AAMAS '03.

[4]  Julie A. Adams,et al.  Multiagent Systems: A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence , 2001, AI Mag..

[5]  Bernard P. Zeigler,et al.  A multimodel methodology for qualitative model engineering , 1992, TOMC.

[6]  Francesco Amigoni,et al.  Anthropic agency: a multiagent system for physiological processes , 2003, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[7]  Francesco Amigoni,et al.  On the Simulation of Multiagent-Based Regulators for Physiological Processes , 2002, MABS.

[8]  Henricus Emerence David Houba Game theoretic models of bargaining , 1994 .

[9]  AmigoniFrancesco,et al.  Multiagent systems for cardiac pacing simulation and control , 2005 .

[10]  Francesco Amigoni,et al.  A cooperative negotiation protocol for physiological model combination , 2004, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..

[11]  Francesco Amigoni,et al.  A theoretical framework for the conception of agency , 1999, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[12]  Jorge J. Moré,et al.  The Levenberg-Marquardt algo-rithm: Implementation and theory , 1977 .

[13]  P C Voukydis,et al.  A physiologically regulated cardiac pacemaker. , 1967, British journal of experimental pathology.

[14]  David A. Meyer,et al.  Towards the global: complexity, topology and chaos in modelling, simulation and computation , 1997, chao-dyn/9710005.

[15]  C. Tomlin,et al.  Decentralized optimization, with application to multiple aircraft coordination , 2002, Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2002..

[16]  Y. Sekine,et al.  Decentralized Optimization of an Interconnected System , 1963 .

[17]  Christopher Landauer,et al.  Integration science: more than putting pieces together , 2000, 2000 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.00TH8484).

[18]  A. Roth Game-Theoretic Models of Bargaining , 1987 .

[19]  R. Palm,et al.  Synchronization of decentralized multiple-model systems by market-based optimization , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[20]  J. Sarma,et al.  An exponential formula for heart rate dependence of QT interval during exercise and cardiac pacing in humans: reevaluation of Bazett's formula. , 1984, The American journal of cardiology.

[21]  N Sulke,et al.  Dual Sensor VVIR Mode Pacing: Is It Worth It? , 1996, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[22]  C P Lau,et al.  The Range of Sensors and Algorithms Used in Rate Adaptive Cardiac Pacing , 1992, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[23]  J Clémenty,et al.  The Promise of Improved Exercise Performance by Dual Sensor Rate Adaptive Pacemakers , 1997, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[24]  M. Glikson,et al.  Cardiac pacing. A review. , 2001, The Medical clinics of North America.

[25]  S. Zionts,et al.  Generating Pareto Solutions in a Two-Party Setting: Constraint Proposal Methods , 1999 .

[26]  Anil Nerode,et al.  Asynchronous, distributed, decision-making systems with semi-autonomous entities: a mathematical framework , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[27]  Ary L. Goldberger,et al.  Chaos in Physiology: Health or Disease? , 1987 .

[28]  Karl Johan Åström,et al.  Control of complex systems , 2001 .