The dermatoscopic ABCD rule does not improve diagnostic accuracy of malignant melanoma.

The dermatoscopic ABCD rule has been suggested to improve diagnostic performance regarding cutaneous malignant melanoma. Using this rule, a total dermatoscopy score is calculated from the presence of various dermatoscopic elements. A total dermatoscopy score above 4.75 signifies possible and 5.45 probable melanoma. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of dermatoscopy with and without the use of the ABCD rule. Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed for the ABCD rule. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.854 (range 0.777-0.906) demonstrating that in 85.4% of the cases, cutaneous malignant melanomas were rated higher than the non-melanoma skin lesions. Sensitivity for the melanoma diagnosis was higher for simple dermatoscopy than when the ABCD rule was used (p<0.05). There was no difference in specificity when a total dermatoscopy score of 4.75 was used as cut-off point, but specificity was lower for simple dermatoscopy than when the total dermatoscopy score of 5.45 was used. Diagnostic accuracy was higher for simple dermatoscopy than for the ABCD rule (p<0.01). In conclusion, the dermatoscopic ABCD rule was not superior to simple dermatoscopy, and fewer malignant melanomas were identified with this rule.

[1]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[2]  H. Schouten,et al.  Statistical measurement of interobserver agreement [: Analysis of agreements and disagreements between observers] , 1985 .

[3]  F A Langley,et al.  The use of ROC curves in histopathologic decision making. , 1985, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[4]  Wilhelm Stolz,et al.  Color Atlas of Dermatoscopy , 1991 .

[5]  K Wolff,et al.  Statistical evaluation of epiluminescence microscopy criteria for melanocytic pigmented skin lesions. , 1993, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[6]  M. Zweig,et al.  Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. , 1993, Clinical chemistry.

[7]  W. Stolz,et al.  The ABCD rule of dermatoscopy. High prospective value in the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic skin lesions. , 1994, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[8]  W B Schill,et al.  Surface microscopy of naevi and melanomas—clues to melanoma , 1994, The British journal of dermatology.

[9]  P Bauer,et al.  Dermatoscopy: usefulness in the differential diagnosis of cutaneous pigmentary lesions , 1994, Melanoma research.

[10]  R. Kenet,et al.  Reducing Mortality and Morbidity of Cutaneous Melanoma: A Six Year Plan: B) Identifying High and Low Risk Pigmented Lesions Using Epiluminescence Microscopy , 1994, The Journal of dermatology.

[11]  W H McCarthy,et al.  The morphologic criteria of the pseudopod in surface microscopy. , 1995, Archives of dermatology.

[12]  M. Binder,et al.  Epiluminescence microscopy. A useful tool for the diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions for formally trained dermatologists. , 1995, Archives of dermatology.

[13]  K Wolff,et al.  Epiluminescence microscopy of small pigmented skin lesions: short-term formal training improves the diagnostic performance of dermatologists. , 1997, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[14]  G. Argenziano,et al.  Epiluminescence microscopy: Criteria of cutaneous melanoma progression , 1997 .

[15]  H. Lorentzen,et al.  Clinical and dermatoscopic diagnosis of malignant melanoma. Assessed by expert and non-expert groups. , 1999, Acta dermato-venereologica.