Quasi-decentralized model-based networked control of process systems

Abstract This paper develops a quasi-decentralized control framework for plants with distributed, interconnected units that exchange information over a shared communication network. In this architecture, each unit in the plant has a local control system that communicates with the plant supervisor – and with other local control systems – through a shared communication medium. The objective is to design an integrated control and communication strategy that ensures the desired closed-loop stability and performance for the plant while minimizing network utilization and communication costs. The idea is to reduce the exchange of information between the local control systems as much as possible without sacrificing stability of the individual units and the overall plant. To this end, dynamic models of the interconnected units are embedded in the local control system of each unit to provide it with an estimate of the evolution of its neighbors when measurements are not transmitted through the network. The use of a model to recreate the interactions of a given unit with one of its neighbors allows the sensor suite of the neighboring unit to send its data in a discrete fashion since the model can provide an approximation of the unit’s dynamics. The state of each model is then updated using the actual state of the corresponding unit provided by its sensors at discrete time instances to compensate for model uncertainty. By formulating the networked closed-loop plant as a hybrid system, an explicit characterization of the maximum allowable update period (i.e., minimum cross communication frequency) between each control system and the sensors of its neighboring units is obtained in terms of the degree of mismatch between the dynamics of the units and the models used to describe them. The developed control strategy is illustrated using a network of interconnected chemical reactors with recycle.

[1]  Alex Zheng,et al.  Hierarchical procedure for plantwide control system synthesis , 1999 .

[2]  Y. Tipsuwan,et al.  Control methodologies in networked control systems , 2003 .

[3]  Linda Bushnell,et al.  Stability analysis of networked control systems , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 American Control Conference (Cat. No. 99CH36251).

[4]  Michael Athans,et al.  Survey of Decentralized Control Methods , 1975 .

[5]  Inanç Birol,et al.  Agent-based control of autocatalytic replicators in networks of reactors , 2005, Computers and Chemical Engineering.

[6]  Panagiotis D. Christofides,et al.  Fault‐tolerant control of process systems using communication networks , 2005 .

[7]  Panos J. Antsaklis,et al.  On the model-based control of networked systems , 2003, Autom..

[8]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Plant-Wide Optimal Control with Decentralized MPC , 2004 .

[9]  Katalin M. Hangos,et al.  Thermodynamic approach to the structural stability of process plants , 1999 .

[10]  B. Erik Ydstie,et al.  Distributed, asynchronous and hybrid simulation of process networks using recording controllers , 2004 .

[11]  Panagiotis D. Christofides,et al.  Smart plant operations: Vision, progress and challenges , 2007 .

[12]  M. R. Katebi,et al.  Predictive control design for large-scale systems , 1997, Autom..

[13]  Michael Baldea,et al.  Dynamics and control of integrated networks with purge streams , 2006 .

[14]  Francis J. Doyle,et al.  DISTRIBUTED MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL OF A FOUR-TANK SYSTEM , 2006 .

[15]  Eduardo Camponogara,et al.  Distributed model predictive control , 2002 .

[16]  Jan Lunze,et al.  Feedback control of large-scale systems , 1992 .

[17]  J. Hespanha,et al.  Communication logics for networked control systems , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference.

[18]  P. Daoutidis,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamics and Control of Process Systems with Recycle , 2000 .

[19]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Stability of networked control systems , 2001 .

[20]  M. A. Henson,et al.  Model Predictive Control of Interconnected Linear and Nonlinear Processes , 2002 .

[21]  Costin Sorin Bildea,et al.  Design of recycle systems with parallel and consecutive reactions by nonlinear analysis , 2005 .

[22]  Sigurd Skogestad,et al.  Control structure design for complete chemical plants , 2004, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[23]  E. W. Jacobsen,et al.  Performance Limitations in Decentralized Control , 2000 .

[24]  A. Cinar,et al.  Agent-based system for reconfiguration of distributed chemical reactor network operation , 2006, 2006 American Control Conference.

[25]  Panagiotis D. Christofides,et al.  Control of Nonlinear and Hybrid Process Systems: Designs for Uncertainty, Constraints and Time-Delays , 2005 .

[26]  C.T. Abdallah,et al.  Inherent issues in networked control systems: a survey , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference.

[27]  Panagiotis D. Christofides,et al.  Coordinating feedback and switching for control of hybrid nonlinear processes , 2003 .

[28]  William L. Luyben,et al.  Plantwide control design procedure , 1997 .

[29]  Panagiotis D. Christofides,et al.  Lyapunov-based Model Predictive Control of Nonlinear Systems Subject to Data Losses , 2007, ACC.

[30]  B. Erik Ydstie,et al.  Passivity based control via the second law , 2002 .

[31]  Dragan Nesic,et al.  Input-to-state stability of networked control systems , 2004, Autom..

[32]  W. Brockett,et al.  Minimum attention control , 1997, Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[33]  Panagiotis D. Christofides,et al.  Fault‐tolerant control of nonlinear process systems subject to sensor faults , 2007 .

[34]  C. Georgakis,et al.  Plantwide regulatory control design procedure using a tiered framework , 1993 .