Cumulative Meta-analysis of the Relationship Between Useful Field of View and Driving Performance in Older Adults: Current and Future Implications

Purpose. Driving is a complex behavior that requires the utilization of a wide range of individual abilities. Identifying assessments that not only capture individual differences, but also are related to older adults’ driving performance would be beneficial. This investigation examines the relationship between the Useful Field of View (UFOV) assessment and objective measures of retrospective or concurrent driving performance, including state-recorded accidents, on-road driving, and driving simulator performance. Method. The PubMed and PsycINFO databases were searched to retrieve eight studies that reported bivariate relationships between UFOV and these objective driving measures. Cumulative meta-analysis techniques were used to combine the effect sizes in an attempt to determine whether the strength of the relationship was stable across studies and to assess whether a sufficient number of studies have been conducted to validate the relationship between UFOV and driving performance. Results. A within-group homogeneity of effect sizes test revealed that the samples could be thought of as being drawn from the same population, Q [7] = 11.29, p (one-tailed) = 0.13. Therefore, the effect sizes of eight studies were combined for the present cumulative meta-analysis. The weighted mean effect size across the studies revealed a large effect (Cohen’s d = 0.945), with poorer UFOV performance associated with negative driving outcomes. This relationship was robust across multiple indices of driving performance and several research laboratories. Conclusions. This convergence of evidence across numerous studies using different methodologies confirms the importance of the UFOV assessment as a valid and reliable index of driving performance and safety. Recent prospective studies have confirmed a relationship between UFOV performance and future crashes, further supporting the use of this instrument as a potential screening measure for at-risk older drivers.

[1]  M. Sloane,et al.  Visual processing impairment and risk of motor vehicle crash among older adults. , 1998, JAMA.

[2]  Harris Cooper,et al.  Statistically Combining Independent Studies: A Meta-Analysis of Sex Differences in Conformity Research , 1979 .

[3]  L A Cushman,et al.  COGNITIVE CAPACITY AND CONCURRENT DRIVING PERFORMANCE IN OLDER DRIVERS , 1996 .

[4]  C. Owsley,et al.  The useful field of view test: a new technique for evaluating age-related declines in visual function. , 1993, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[5]  G McGwin,et al.  Identifying crash involvement among older drivers: agreement between self-report and state records. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Marlos Viana,et al.  SHORT NOTE Relative Effects of Age and Compromised Vision on Driving Performance , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[7]  M. Reger,et al.  The relationship between neuropsychological functioning and driving ability in dementia: a meta-analysis. , 2004, Neuropsychology.

[8]  A F Sanders,et al.  Some aspects of the selective process in the functional visual field. , 1970, Ergonomics.

[9]  K Ball,et al.  Identifying Correlates of Accident Involvement for the Older Driver , 1991, Human factors.

[10]  J P Szlyk,et al.  Evaluation of driving performance in patients with juvenile macular dystrophies. , 1993, Archives of ophthalmology.

[11]  A. Heijl,et al.  Sixth International Visual Field Symposium , 1985, Documenta Ophthalmologica Proceedings Series.

[12]  D. Roth,et al.  Useful Field of View and Other Neurocognitive Indicators of Crash Risk in Older Adults , 2004, Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings.

[13]  K. Ball,et al.  Visual attention problems as a predictor of vehicle crashes in older drivers. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  Paul R. Yarnold,et al.  Reading and Understanding Multivariate Statistics , 1995 .

[15]  C. Owsley,et al.  Relationship between visual sensitivity and target localization in older adults , 1995, Vision Research.

[16]  S Reinach,et al.  Simulated car crashes and crash predictors in drivers with Alzheimer disease. , 1997, Archives of neurology.

[17]  K. Ball,et al.  Visual/cognitive correlates of vehicle accidents in older drivers. , 1991, Psychology and aging.

[18]  Karlene K. Ball,et al.  Reliability and Validity of Useful Field of View Test Scores as Administered by Personal Computer , 2005, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[19]  Karlene K. Ball,et al.  Speed-of-Processing and Driving Simulator Training Result in Improved Driving Performance , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[20]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[21]  C. Owsley,et al.  PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE EYE , 2022 .

[22]  W. L. Mihal,et al.  Individual differences in perceptual information processing and their relation to automobile accident involvement. , 1976, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  Keith Wheatley,et al.  Understanding meta-analysis , 2001 .

[24]  M. Albert,et al.  Performance-based driving evaluation of the elderly driver: safety, reliability, and validity. , 1994, Journal of gerontology.

[25]  Linda Wetzel,et al.  Development and assessment of a neuropsychological battery to aid in predicting driving performance. , 2002, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[26]  George W Rebok,et al.  Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: a randomized controlled trial. , 2002, JAMA.

[27]  J. Duchek,et al.  Reliability of the Washington University Road Test. A performance-based assessment for drivers with dementia of the Alzheimer type. , 1997, Archives of neurology.

[28]  J. Wood,et al.  Elderly Drivers and Simulated Visual Impairment , 1995, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[29]  M. Tinetti,et al.  Self-report versus state records for identifying crashes among older drivers. , 1997, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[30]  Brian Mullen,et al.  Advanced BASIC meta-analysis , 1989 .

[31]  Frederick L. McGuire.  The nature of bias in official accident and violation records. , 1973 .

[32]  D. Roenker,et al.  Age and visual search: expanding the useful field of view. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[33]  Karlene K. Ball,et al.  INCREASING MOBILITY AND REDUCING ACCIDENTS OF OLDER DRIVERS. IN: MOBILITY AND TRANSPORTATION IN THE ELDERLY , 2000 .

[34]  D. Roth,et al.  Relation of Useful Field of View and other Screening Tests to on-Road Driving Performance , 2000, Perceptual and motor skills.

[35]  G V Barrett,et al.  Adaptive Training and Individual Differences in Perception , 1977, Perceptual and motor skills.

[36]  D. Roenker,et al.  Developmental changes in attention and visual search throughout adulthood. , 1990 .

[37]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Relation of a test of attention to road accidents. , 1973 .

[38]  Brian Mullen,et al.  Cumulative Meta-Analysis: A Consideration of Indicators of Sufficiency and Stability , 2001 .

[39]  J. Szlyk,et al.  Assessment of driving performance in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. , 1992, Archives of ophthalmology.

[40]  J. Duchek,et al.  Attention and driving performance in Alzheimer's disease. , 1998, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.