Synthesis and new evidence from the PROTECT UK National Core Study: Determining occupational risks of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 mortality

Introduction: The PROTECT National Core Study was funded by the UK Health and Safety Executive (HSE) to investigate routes of transmission for SARS-CoV-2 and variation between settings. Methods: A workshop was organised in Oct 2022.We brought together evidence from five published epidemiological studies that compared risks of SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 mortality by occupation or sector funded by PROTECT relating to three non-overlapping data sets, plus additional unpublished analyses relating to the Omicron period. We extracted descriptive study level data and model results. We investigated risk across four pandemic waves using forest plots for key occupational groups by time-period. Results: Results were largely consistent across different studies with different expected biases. Healthcare and social care sectors saw elevated risks of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 mortality early in the pandemic, but thereafter this declined and varied by specific occupational subgroup. The education sector saw sustained elevated risks of infection after the initial lockdown period with little evidence of elevated mortality. Conclusions: Increased in risk of infection and mortality were consistently observed for occupations in high risk sectors particularly during the early stage of the pandemic. The education sector showed a different pattern compared to the other high risk sectors, as relative risk of infections remained high in the later phased of the pandemic, although no increased in COVID-19 mortality (compared to low-risk occupations) was observed in this sector in any point during the pandemic.

[1]  M. Coleman,et al.  Excess mortality among essential workers in England and Wales during the COVID-19 pandemic: an updated analysis , 2023, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[2]  S. Katikireddi,et al.  Occupational differences in SARS-CoV-2 infection: analysis of the UK ONS COVID-19 infection survey , 2022, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[3]  N. Pearce,et al.  Longitudinal changes in proportionate mortality due to COVID-19 by occupation in England and Wales. , 2022, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[4]  A. Yavlinsky,et al.  Occupation, Worker Vulnerability, and COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake: Analysis of the Virus Watch prospective cohort study , 2022, Vaccine.

[5]  M. Coleman,et al.  Excess mortality among essential workers in England and Wales during the COVID-19 pandemic , 2022, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[6]  A. Yavlinsky,et al.  Workplace contact patterns in England during the COVID-19 pandemic: Analysis of the Virus Watch prospective cohort study , 2021, The Lancet Regional Health - Europe.

[7]  N. Pearce,et al.  Differences in COVID-19 vaccination coverage by occupation in England: a national linked data study , 2021, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[8]  F. Balloux,et al.  Pre-existing polymerase-specific T cells expand in abortive seronegative SARS-CoV-2 infection , 2021, medRxiv.

[9]  M. Coleman,et al.  Occupation and COVID-19 mortality in England: a national linked data study of 14.3 million adults , 2021, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[10]  N. Pearce,et al.  Occupational differences in COVID-19 incidence, severity, and mortality in the United Kingdom: Available data and framework for analyses , 2021, Wellcome open research.

[11]  J. Sterne,et al.  Collider bias undermines our understanding of COVID-19 disease risk and severity , 2020, Nature Communications.

[12]  Debbie A Lawlor,et al.  Triangulation in aetiological epidemiology , 2016, International journal of epidemiology.

[13]  R. McNamee,et al.  Confounding and confounders , 2003, Occupational and environmental medicine.