Aerosol retention in the flooded steam generator bundle during SGTR

A steam generator tube rupture in a pressurized water reactor may cause accidental release of radioactive particles into the environment. Its specific significance is in its potential to bypass the containment thereby providing a direct pathway of the radioactivity from the primary circuit to the environment. Under certain severe accident scenarios, the steam generator bundle may be flooded with water. In addition, some severe accident management procedures are designed to minimize the release of radioactivity into the environment by flooding the defective steam generator secondary side with water when the steam generator has dried out. To extend our understanding of the particle retention phenomena in the flooded steam generator bundle, tests were conducted in the ARTIST and ARTIST II programs to determine the effect of different parameters on particle retention. The effects of particle type (spherical or agglomerate), particle size, gas mass flow rate, and the break submergence on particle retention were investigated. Results can be summarized as follows: increasing particle inertia was found to increase retention in the flooded bundle. Particle shape, i.e., agglomerate or spherical structure, did not affect retention significantly. Even with a very low submergence, 0.3 m above the tube break, significant aerosol retention took place underlining the importance of the jet–bundle interactions close to the tube break. Droplets were entrained from the water surface with high gas flow rates carrying aerosol particles with them. However, compared to particle retention in the water close to the tube break, the effect of droplet entrainment on particle transport was small.

[1]  S. M. Ghiaasiaan,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of aerosol transport in rising gas bubbles undergoing shape deformation , 2006 .

[2]  Luis E. Herranz,et al.  Particle retention mechanisms in bubbles: SPARC-BUSCA models comparison , 1995 .

[3]  Luis E. Herranz,et al.  Aerosol Retention in the Vicinity of a Breach in a Tube Bundle: An Experimental Investigation , 2010 .

[4]  Luis E. Herranz,et al.  Progress in Understanding Key Aerosol Issues , 2010 .

[5]  A. Dehbi,et al.  ARTIST: Introduction and First Results , 2004 .

[6]  Luis E. Herranz,et al.  Steam generator tube rupture (SGTR) scenarios , 2005 .

[7]  V. Peyres,et al.  Modelling inertial impaction within pool scrubbing codes , 2000 .

[8]  D. Suckow,et al.  AEROSOL TRAPPING IN STEAM GENERATOR (ARTIST): AN INVESTIGATION OF AEROSOL AND IODINE BEHAVIOUR IN THE SECONDARY SIDE OF A STEAM GENERATOR , 2000 .

[9]  Luis E. Herranz,et al.  Experimental and Analytical Study on Pool Scrubbing Under JET Injection Regime , 1997 .

[10]  D. Suckow,et al.  ARTIST: introduction and first results , 2004 .

[11]  K Kussmaul 25th Water Reactor Safety Information Meeting , 1999 .

[12]  A. Dehbi,et al.  Aerosol retention in low-subcooling pools under realistic accident conditions , 2001 .

[13]  Klaus Willeke,et al.  Aerosol Measurement: Principles, Techniques, and Applications , 2001 .

[14]  Jorma Keskinen,et al.  Electrical low pressure impactor , 1992 .

[15]  Risto Hillamo,et al.  On the Performance of the Berner Low Pressure Impactor , 1991 .

[16]  A. Dehbi,et al.  De-agglomeration mechanisms of TiO2 aerosol agglomerates in PWR steam generator tube rupture conditions , 2010 .

[17]  M. L. Laucks,et al.  Aerosol Technology Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles , 2000 .