The Smooth Signal Redundancy Hypothesis: A Functional Explanation for Relationships between Redundancy, Prosodic Prominence, and Duration in Spontaneous Speech

This paper explores two related factors which influence variation in duration, prosodic structure and redundancy in spontaneous speech. We argue that the constraint of producing robust communication while efficiently expending articulatory effort leads to an inverse relationship between language redundancy and duration. The inverse relationship improves communication robustness by spreading information more evenly across the speech signal, yielding a smoother signal redundancy profile. We argue that prosodic prominence is a linguistic means of achieving smooth signal redundancy. Prosodic prominence increases syllable duration and coincides to a large extent with unpredictable sections of speech, and thus leads to a smoother signal redundancy. The results of linear regressions carried out between measures of redundancy, syllable duration and prosodic structure in a large corpus of spontaneous speech confirm: (1) an inverse relationship between language redundancy and duration, and (2) a strong relationship between prosodic prominence and duration. The fact that a large proportion of the variance predicted by language redundancy and prosodic prominence is nonunique suggests that, in English, prosodic prominence structure is the means with which constraints caused by a robust signal requirement are expressed in spontaneous speech.

[1]  Jan Edwards,et al.  Papers in Laboratory Phonology: Lengthenings and shortenings and the nature of prosodic constituency , 1990 .

[2]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[3]  D. Fry.  Duration and Intensity as Physical Correlates of Linguistic Stress , 1954 .

[4]  C. Fowler,et al.  Talkers' signaling of new and old. words in speech and listeners' perception and use of the distinction , 1987 .

[5]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary , 1987 .

[6]  Julie E. Boland,et al.  Priming in pronunciation: Beyond pattern recognition and onset latency , 1989 .

[7]  Stephen Isard,et al.  Segment durations in a syllable frame , 1991 .

[8]  Carol A. Fowler,et al.  Reductions of Spoken Words in Certain Discourse Contexts , 1997 .

[9]  M. Beckman.  Stress And Non-Stress Accent , 1986 .

[10]  Matthew P. Aylett,et al.  The dissociation of deaccenting, Givenness, and syntactic role in spontaneous speech. , 1999 .

[11]  Michelle L. Gregory,et al.  Which Predictability Measures Affect Content Word Durations , 2002 .

[12]  Catherine Frances Sotillo.  Phonological reduction and intelligibility in task-oriented dialogue , 1997 .

[13]  A. Botinis,et al.  Intonation , 2001, Speech Commun..

[14]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[15]  Stephen D. Goldinger,et al.  Lexical neighborhoods in speech production: A first report , 1989 .

[16]  Alan W. Black,et al.  Multilingual text-to-speech synthesis , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[17]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Speech perception, word recognition and the structure of the lexicon , 1985, Speech Commun..

[18]  Julia Hirschberg,et al.  Modeling Local Context for Pitch Accent Prediction , 2000, ACL.

[19]  P. Keating,et al.  Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  B. Lindblom.  Speech Production. Vowel Duration and a Model of Lip Mandible Coordination , 1982 .

[21]  John R. Pierce,et al.  Symbols, Signals, and Noise: The Nature and Process of Communication. , 1961 .

[22]  Arthur G. Samuel,et al.  Articulation Quality Is Inversely Related to Redundancy When Children or Adults Have Verbal Control , 1998 .

[23]  J. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Intonational structure in Japanese and English , 1986, Phonology.

[24]  Colin W. Wightman,et al.  Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  Anne H. Anderson,et al.  The Hcrc Map Task Corpus , 1991 .

[26]  Matthew P. Aylett,et al.  Stochastic suprasegmentals: relationships between redundancy, prosodic structure and care of articulation in spontaneous speech , 2000, INTERSPEECH.

[27]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[28]  Matthew P. Aylett,et al.  Prosodic transcription of Glasgow English: an evaluation study of GlaToBI , 1997 .

[29]  Alice Turk,et al.  The domain of accentual lengthening in American English , 1997 .

[30]  Sharon Hunnicutt,et al.  Intelligibility Versus Redundancy - Conditions of Dependency , 1985 .

[31]  Laurence White,et al.  Structural influences on accentual lengthening in English , 1999 .

[32]  P. Lieberman.  Some Effects of Semantic and Grammatical Context on the Production and Perception of Speech , 1963 .

[33]  Matthew P. Aylett,et al.  The automatic marking of prominence in spontaneous speech using duration and part of speech information , 1998, ICSLP.

[34]  Ronald Rosenfeld,et al.  Statistical language modeling using the CMU-cambridge toolkit , 1997, EUROSPEECH.

[35]  Richard W. Wright,et al.  Lexical Competition and Reduction in Speech: A Preliminary Report 1 , 1997 .

[36]  G. Booij.  The Phonology of Dutch , 1995 .

[37]  佐竹 元一郎,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models--Regression,Analysis of Variance,and Experimental Designs 3rd ed./John Neter et al.(1990) , 1991 .

[38]  Jean Christophe Verstraeh.  Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure , 2005 .