A 5-year retrospective study of survival of zirconia single crowns fitted in a private clinical setting.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this report was to evaluate the 5-year clinical performance and survival of zirconia (NobelProcera™) single crowns. METHODS All patients treated with porcelain-veneered zirconia single crowns in a private practice during the period October 2004 to November 2005 were included. The records were scrutinized for clinical data. Information was available for 162 patients and 205 crowns. RESULTS Most crowns (78%) were placed on premolars and molars. Out of the 143 crowns that were followed for 5 years, 126 (88%) did not have any complications. Of those with complications, the most common were: extraction of abutment tooth (7; 3%), loss of retention (15; 7%), need of endodontic treatment (9; 4%) and porcelain veneer fracture (6; 3%). No zirconia cores fractured. In total 19 restorations (9%) were recorded as failures: abutment tooth extraction (7), remake of crown due to lost retention (6), veneer fracture (4), persistent pain (1) and caries (1). The 5-year cumulative survival rate (CSR) was 88.8%. CONCLUSIONS According to the present 5-year results zirconia crowns (NobelProcera™) are a promising prosthodontic alternative also in the premolar and molar regions. Out of the 143 crowns followed for 5 years, 126 (88%) did not have any complications. However, 9% of the restorations were judged as failures. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the long-term success.

[1]  M. Groten,et al.  The performance of zirconium dioxide crowns: a clinical follow-up. , 2010, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[2]  R. Weiger,et al.  What is the prevalence of various types of prosthetic dental restorations in Europe? , 2007, Clinical oral implants research.

[3]  D. Edelhoff,et al.  Prospective study of zirconia-based restorations: 3-year clinical results. , 2010, Quintessence international.

[4]  G. Bergenholtz,et al.  Endodontic complications following periodontal and prosthetic treatment of patients with advanced periodontal disease. , 1984, Journal of periodontology.

[5]  Anders Ortorp,et al.  A 3-year retrospective and clinical follow-up study of zirconia single crowns performed in a private practice. , 2009, Journal of dentistry.

[6]  Irena Sailer,et al.  A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all‐ceramic and metal–ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part II: fixed dental prostheses. , 2007 .

[7]  M. Zwahlen,et al.  Comparison of survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal ceramic reconstructions - A systematic review: Part I. Single crowns , 2007 .

[8]  K. Akca,et al.  CAD/CAM ZIRCONIA VS. SLIP-CAST GLASS-INFILTRATED ALUMINA/ZIRCONIA ALL-CERAMIC CROWNS: 2-YEAR RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL , 2009, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[9]  Charles J Goodacre,et al.  Clinical complications in fixed prosthodontics. , 2003, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[10]  P. Manicone,et al.  An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. , 2007, Journal of dentistry.

[11]  K Lyons,et al.  Clinical trials in zirconia: a systematic review. , 2010, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[12]  F. Burke,et al.  Ten-year outcome of crowns placed within the General Dental Services in England and Wales. , 2009, Journal of dentistry.