Obtaining information by dynamic (effortful) touching

Dynamic touching is effortful touching. It entails deformation of muscles and fascia and activation of the embedded mechanoreceptors, as when an object is supported and moved by the body. It is realized as exploratory activities that can vary widely in spatial and temporal extents (a momentary heft, an extended walk). Research has revealed the potential of dynamic touching for obtaining non-visual information about the body (e.g. limb orientation), attachments to the body (e.g. an object's height and width) and the relation of the body both to attachments (e.g. hand's location on a grasped object) and surrounding surfaces (e.g. places and their distances). Invariants over the exploratory activity (e.g. moments of a wielded object's mass distribution) seem to ground this ‘information about’. The conception of a haptic medium as a nested tensegrity structure has been proposed to express the obtained information realized by myofascia deformation, by its invariants and transformations. The tensegrity proposal rationalizes the relative indifference of dynamic touch to the site of mechanical contact (hand, foot, torso or probe) and the overtness of exploratory activity. It also provides a framework for dynamic touching's fractal nature, and the finding that its degree of fractality may matter to its accomplishments.

[1]  M. Turvey Dynamic touch. , 1996, The American psychologist.

[2]  Roger D. Santer,et al.  Tactile learning by a whip spider, Phrynus marginemaculatus C.L. Koch (Arachnida, Amblypygi) , 2009, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[3]  M T Turvey,et al.  Haptic probing: Perceiving the length of a probe and the distance of a surface probed , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  C. Carello,et al.  Mutuality in the perception of affordances and the control of movement. , 2009, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[5]  René Motro,et al.  Tensegrity: Latest and future developments , 2003 .

[6]  Christopher C. Pagano,et al.  SPINORS AND SELECTIVE DYNAMIC TOUCH , 1996 .

[7]  Brett R Fajen,et al.  Learning to control collisions: the role of perceptual attunement and action boundaries. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  P. Cabe Sufficiency of longitudinal moment of inertia for haptic cylinder length judgments. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  M T Turvey,et al.  Principles of Part–Whole Selective Perception by Dynamic Touch Extend to the Torso , 2011, Journal of motor behavior.

[10]  S. Runeson On the possibility of "smart" perceptual mechanisms. , 1977, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[11]  Hod Lipson,et al.  Mechanism as Mind - What Tensegrities and Caterpillars Can Teach Us about Soft Robotics , 2008, ALIFE.

[12]  Wolf Hanke,et al.  The hydrodynamic trails of Lepomis gibbosus (Centrarchidae), Colomesus psittacus (Tetraodontidae) and Thysochromis ansorgii (Cichlidae) investigated with scanning particle image velocimetry , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[13]  Gregory Burton,et al.  Non-Neural Extensions of haptic Sensitivity , 1993 .

[14]  Peter J Beek,et al.  The perception of limb orientation depends on the center of mass. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  E. Reed Encountering the world: Toward an ecological psychology. , 1997 .

[16]  G. Berkeley Essay Towards a New Theory of Vision , 2004 .

[17]  W T Maddox,et al.  Perceptual separability, decisional separability, and the identification-speeded classification relationship. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  Steven J. Harrison,et al.  Place learning by mechanical contact , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[19]  Kevin Shockley,et al.  Metamers in the haptic perception of heaviness and moveableness , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  M T Turvey,et al.  Haptically perceiving the distances reachable with hand-held objects. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  Steven J. Harrison,et al.  Human odometer is gait-symmetry specific , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  Frederike D. Hanke,et al.  Flow sensing by pinniped whiskers , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  Damian G. Stephen,et al.  The role of fractality in perceptual learning: exploration in dynamic touch. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  Maddox Wt,et al.  Perceptual separability, decisional separability, and the identification-speeded classification relationship. , 1996 .

[25]  C Carello,et al.  Selective perception by dynamic touch , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  Professor Dr. Friedrich G. Barth A Spider’s World , 2002, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[27]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Perceiving extents of rods by wielding: haptic diagonalization and decomposition of the inertia tensor. , 1989 .

[28]  Martin Golubitsky,et al.  Central pattern generators for bipedal locomotion , 2006, Journal of mathematical biology.

[29]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  M T Turvey,et al.  Weight perception and the haptic size-weight illusion are functions of the inertia tensor. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Perceiving the Lengths of Rods That are Held But Not Wielded , 1990 .

[32]  M. Turvey,et al.  Eigenvalues of the inertia tensor and exteroception by the “muscular sense” , 1994, Neuroscience.

[33]  René Motro,et al.  Tensegrity: Structural Systems for the Future , 2003 .

[34]  Natasha Loder,et al.  Journal under attack over controversial paper on GM food , 1999, Nature.

[35]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Effortful touch with minimal movement , 1992 .

[36]  H. Stanley,et al.  Quantification of scaling exponents and crossover phenomena in nonstationary heartbeat time series. , 1995, Chaos.

[37]  J. Singer,et al.  Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis , 2003 .

[38]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Rotational Invariants and Dynamic Touch , 2003 .

[39]  Ma Conway,et al.  Handbook of perception and cognition , 1996 .

[40]  Donald E. Ingber,et al.  Tensegrity-based mechanosensing from macro to micro. , 2008, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[41]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Is Tensegrity the Functional Architecture of the Equilibrium Point Hypothesis , 2010 .

[42]  Steven J. Harrison,et al.  Comparison of Dynamic (Effortful) Touch by Hand and Foot , 2007, Journal of motor behavior.

[43]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[44]  M. Turvey,et al.  The inertia tensor as a basis for the perception of limb orientation. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  M T Turvey,et al.  Nonvisible perception of segments of a hand-held object and the attitude spinor. , 1998, Journal of motor behavior.

[46]  M T Turvey,et al.  Inertia tensor and weight-percept models of length perception by static holding. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  David Hestenes,et al.  Invariant body kinematics: I. Saccadic and compensatory eye movements , 1994, Neural Networks.

[48]  Michael T Turvey,et al.  Nature of motor control: perspectives and issues. , 2009, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[49]  M. Golubitsky,et al.  Symmetry in locomotor central pattern generators and animal gaits , 1999, Nature.

[50]  M T Turvey,et al.  Perceiving the width and height of a hand-held object by dynamic touch. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[51]  Geoffrey P. Bingham,et al.  Perceiving the size of trees: form as information about scale , 1993 .

[52]  G. Berkeley An essay toward a new theory of vision, 1709. , 1948 .

[53]  Michael A Riley,et al.  Perceptual Behavior: Recurrence Analysis of a Haptic Exploratory Procedure , 2002, Perception.

[54]  M T Turvey,et al.  Spatial and physical frames of reference in positioning a limb , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[55]  M. Turvey,et al.  The Self-Organizing Dynamics of Intentions and Actions@@@Dynamics in Action: Intentional Behavior as a Complex System , 2001 .

[56]  David Hestenes Invariant body kinematics: II. Reaching and neurogeometry , 1994, Neural Networks.

[57]  Peter J Beek,et al.  Which mechanical invariants are associated with the perception of length and heaviness of a nonvisible handheld rod? Testing the inertia tensor hypothesis. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[58]  M. Schwartz Haptic perception of the distance walked when blindfolded. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[59]  Claire F Michaels,et al.  Information space is action space: perceiving the partial lengths of rods rotated on an axle , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[60]  R. Motro,et al.  Tensegrity Systems , 2003 .

[61]  N. Perrin,et al.  Varieties of perceptual independence. , 1986, Psychological review.

[62]  Charles L. Webber,et al.  Assessing Deterministic Structures in Physiological Systems Using Recurrence Plot Strategies , 1996 .

[63]  Rüdiger Wehner,et al.  Visual and tactile learning of ground structures in desert ants , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[64]  Christopher C. Pagano,et al.  Is Limb Proprioception a Function of the Limbs' Intertial Eigenvectors? , 1996 .

[65]  H. Solomon,et al.  Movement-produced invariants in haptic explorations: An example of a self-organizing, information-driven, intentional system , 1988 .

[66]  F. Barth,et al.  A Spider’s World: Senses and Behavior , 2001 .