Levobupivacaine Consumption in Automated Intermittent Bolus in Ultrasound Guided Subparaneural Sciatic Nerve Catheters: A Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Trial

Purpose Continuous sciatic nerve blocks have proven benefits for postoperative analgesia after foot surgery. However, the optimal mode of administration remains a point of debate. Ultrasound guided subparaneural injection accelerates onset time and increases duration after a single shot sciatic nerve block. This double blind prospective randomized trial compares the 48-hour local anesthetic (LA) dose consumption of an automated intermittent bolus technique to a continuous infusion regimen in a subparaneural sciatic nerve catheter after hallux valgus surgery. Patients and Methods Patients scheduled for hallux valgus surgery were randomized to receive either a continuous infusion of levobupivacaine 0.125% at 5mL/h (group A) or an intermittent automated bolus of 9.8 mL every 2 hours with a background of 0.1 mL/h (group B), both with a PCA bolus of 6 mL and lockout of 30 minutes. The 48 hour LA consumption, PCA boluses, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), satisfaction and return of normal sensation were recorded. Results Sixteen patients were excluded because of protocol violation or technical problems and 42 patients remained for analysis. The 48 hour ropivacaine consumption was higher in group A (293 ±60 mL) than group B (257±33 mL). The median and highest NRS scores and patient satisfaction were not statistically different between groups. Normal sensation returned after 75 ± 22 hours (group A) and 70 ± 17 hours (group B). Conclusion Programmed bolus administration in subparaneural sciatic nerve catheters reduces LA consumption 48 hours after surgery with equal analgesia and patient satisfaction. Return of sensation is variable and can last more than 75 hours.

[1]  Rebecca Lynn Johnson,et al.  Intermittent bolus versus continuous infusion techniques for local anesthetic delivery in peripheral and truncal nerve analgesia: the current state of evidence , 2019, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[2]  A. D. de Gaudio,et al.  A comparison of two different concentrations and infusion rates of ropivacaine in perineural infusion administered at the same total dose for analgesia after foot and ankle surgery: a randomized, double blinded, controlled study. , 2019, Minerva anestesiologica.

[3]  P. Taffé,et al.  Comparison of peripheral nerve blockade characteristics between non‐diabetic patients and patients suffering from diabetic neuropathy: a prospective cohort study , 2018, Anaesthesia.

[4]  R. Gabriel,et al.  Continuous Popliteal-Sciatic Blocks for Postoperative Analgesia: Traditional Proximal Catheter Insertion Superficial to the Paraneural Sheath Versus a New Distal Insertion Site Deep to the Paraneural Sheath. , 2018, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[5]  Seunghun Lee,et al.  “Fat Brook” in the Popliteal Fossa: Cadaveric and Clinical Investigation With Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2017, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[6]  E. Riley,et al.  Implementation of Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus for the Maintenance of Labor Analgesia , 2016, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[7]  E. M. Pedersen,et al.  Displacement of popliteal sciatic nerve catheters after major foot and ankle surgery: a randomized controlled double-blinded magnetic resonance imaging study. , 2016, British journal of anaesthesia.

[8]  E. Roofthooft,et al.  A double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing dexamethasone and clonidine as adjuvants to a ropivacaine sciatic popliteal block for foot surgery , 2016, Local and regional anesthesia.

[9]  M. Hollmann,et al.  Local Anesthetic-Induced Neurotoxicity , 2016, International journal of molecular sciences.

[10]  J. Louwerens,et al.  The effects of adding epinephrine to ropivacaine for popliteal nerve block on the duration of postoperative analgesia: a randomized controlled trial , 2015, BMC Anesthesiology.

[11]  J. Neal,et al.  The Second ASRA Practice Advisory on Neurologic Complications Associated With Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine: Executive Summary 2015 , 2015, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[12]  E. Mascha,et al.  A randomized, triple-masked, active-controlled investigation of the relative effects of dose, concentration, and infusion rate for continuous popliteal-sciatic nerve blocks in volunteers. , 2015, British journal of anaesthesia.

[13]  A. Gray,et al.  Sonography of the Paraneural Sheath of the Sciatic Nerve in the Popliteal Fossa: More Than a Bifurcation , 2013, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[14]  E. Pogatzki-Zahn,et al.  Ultrasound compared with nerve stimulation guidance for peripheral nerve catheter placement: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2013, British journal of anaesthesia.

[15]  L. Hazrati,et al.  Ultrasound-Guided Popliteal Block Through a Common Paraneural Sheath Versus Conventional Injection: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study , 2013, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[16]  B. Ilfeld Continuous peripheral nerve blocks in the hospital and at home. , 2011, Anesthesiology clinics.

[17]  C. Ball,et al.  Catheter Orifice Configuration Influences the Effectiveness of Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blockade , 2011, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[18]  M. Grafe,et al.  Local Anesthetic Schwann Cell Toxicity Is Time and Concentration Dependent , 2011, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[19]  C. V. Rohde,et al.  Ultrasound Guidance Improves a Continuous Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block When Compared With Nerve Stimulation , 2010, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[20]  M. Taboada,et al.  Comparison of Continuous Infusion versus Automated Bolus for Postoperative Patient-controlled Analgesia with Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Catheters , 2009, Anesthesiology.

[21]  F. Gudé,et al.  A “New” Automated Bolus Technique for Continuous Popliteal Block: A Prospective, Randomized Comparison with a Continuous Infusion Technique , 2008, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[22]  D. Theriaque,et al.  The Effects of Varying Local Anesthetic Concentration and Volume on Continuous Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Blocks: A Dual-Center, Randomized, Controlled Study , 2008, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[23]  A. Borgeat,et al.  The Feasibility and Complications of the Continuous Popliteal Nerve Block: A 1001-Case Survey , 2006, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[24]  A. Casati,et al.  Levobupivacaine 0.2% or 0.125% for Continuous Sciatic Nerve Block: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison with 0.2% Ropivacaine , 2004, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[25]  N. Rawal,et al.  Continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block for outpatient foot surgery – a randomized, controlled trial , 2004, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[26]  P. White,et al.  The Use of a Continuous Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block After Surgery Involving the Foot and Ankle: Does It Improve the Quality of Recovery? , 2003, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[27]  F. Salinas Location, Location, Location: Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks and Stimulating Catheters , 2002, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[28]  T. Morey,et al.  Continuous Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain Control at Home: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Study , 2002, Anesthesiology.

[29]  F. Singelyn,et al.  Continuous Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block: An Original Technique to Provide Postoperative Analgesia After Foot Surgery , 1997, Anesthesia and analgesia.