The antiviral drug efavirenz reduces biofilm formation and hemolysis by Staphylococcus aureus.

Introduction. Biofilm formation and hemolysis are closely related to the pathogenicity of Staphylococcus aureus.Hypothesis/Gap Statement. Strategies that reduce the mortality of S. aureus infections may involve novel antimicrobials and/or drugs that decrease S. aureus virulence, such as biofilm formation. The antiviral drug efavirenz is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, which also has shown antibacterial effect on Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli. Its effect on pathogen virulence has not yet been explored.Aim. This study investigates the antimicrobial and anti-virulence effect of efavirenz on S. aureus.Methodology. Biofilm biomasses were detected by crystal violet staining. Hemolysis activities of S. aureus were determined by rabbit erythrocytes lysis assay. RNA levels of transcriptional regulatory genes, biofilm-related genes, and virulence-related genes of S. aureus were determined by RT-qPCR.Results. Efavirenz showed an inhibitory effect on the growth of S. aureus, Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus agalactiae at 50 µM. Efavirenz significantly inhibited biofilm formation of both methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) at 25 µM, but did not affect the growth of planktonic S. aureus cells. Moreover, hemolysis by S. aureus was inhibited by efavirenz at 25 µM. The expression levels of RNA transcriptional regulatory genes (agrA, agrC, sigB, saeR and saeS), biofilm-related genes (cidA, clfA, clfB, fnbA, fnbB), and virulence-related genes (hla, hld, staphopain B, alpha-3 PSM, beta PSM, delta PSM) of S. aureus decreased significantly at 25 µM efavirenz.Conclusion. Efavirenz inhibits S. aureus biofilm formation and virulence in vitro.

[1]  D. Qu,et al.  Diclazuril Inhibits Biofilm Formation and Hemolysis of Staphylococcus aureus. , 2021, ACS infectious diseases.

[2]  D. Qu,et al.  Staphylococcus aureus PhoU Homologs Regulate Persister Formation and Virulence , 2020, Frontiers in Microbiology.

[3]  A. van Belkum,et al.  The global prevalence of Daptomycin, Tigecycline, Quinupristin/Dalfopristin, and Linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase–negative staphylococci strains: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2020, Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control.

[4]  D. Qu,et al.  In vitro activities of telithromycin against Staphylococcus aureus biofilms compared with azithromycin, clindamycin, vancomycin and daptomycin. , 2020, Journal of medical microbiology.

[5]  Jin-xin Zheng,et al.  Biofilm formation in erythromycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and the relationship with antimicrobial susceptibility and molecular characteristics. , 2018, Microbial pathogenesis.

[6]  N. Abd. Rahman,et al.  Suppression of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation and virulence by a benzimidazole derivative, UM-C162 , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[7]  L. Coelho,et al.  Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis infections on implants. , 2017, The Journal of hospital infection.

[8]  V. Afreixo,et al.  Evaluation of vancomycin MIC creep in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections-a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2017, Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[9]  H. Günthard,et al.  Antibacterial Effects of Antiretrovirals, Potential Implications for Microbiome Studies in HIV , 2017, Antiviral therapy.

[10]  K. Bayles,et al.  Staphylococcus aureus biofilm: a complex developmental organism , 2017, Molecular microbiology.

[11]  H. Ingmer,et al.  Norlichexanthone Reduces Virulence Gene Expression and Biofilm Formation in Staphylococcus aureus , 2016, PloS one.

[12]  L. Rahme,et al.  Considerations and caveats in anti-virulence drug development. , 2016, Current opinion in microbiology.

[13]  Jintae Lee,et al.  Calcium-chelating alizarin and other anthraquinones inhibit biofilm formation and the hemolytic activity of Staphylococcus aureus , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[14]  P. Kawalec,et al.  Efavirenz-Based Regimens in Antiretroviral-Naive HIV-Infected Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials , 2015, PloS one.

[15]  Jintae Lee,et al.  Anti-biofilm, anti-hemolysis, and anti-virulence activities of black pepper, cananga, myrrh oils, and nerolidol against Staphylococcus aureus , 2014, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[16]  A. Sonnen,et al.  Role of Pore-Forming Toxins in Neonatal Sepsis , 2013, Clinical & developmental immunology.

[17]  F. Vandenesch,et al.  Staphylococcus aureus Hemolysins, bi-component Leukocidins, and Cytolytic Peptides: A Redundant Arsenal of Membrane-Damaging Virulence Factors? , 2012, Front. Cell. Inf. Microbio..

[18]  F. Maggiolo Efavirenz: a decade of clinical experience in the treatment of HIV , 2009, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[19]  J. Gouaux,et al.  Structure of Staphylococcal α-Hemolysin, a Heptameric Transmembrane Pore , 1996, Science.

[20]  J. Freer,et al.  Interaction of Staphylococcal α-Toxin with Artificial and Natural Membranes , 1968 .

[21]  Maneesha K. Suresh,et al.  An update on recent developments in the prevention and treatment of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. , 2019, International journal of medical microbiology : IJMM.

[22]  R. Daum,et al.  Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus Infections. , 2017, Current topics in microbiology and immunology.