New Dawn or Bad Moon Rising? Large Scale Government Administered Workplace Surveys and the Future of Canadian IR Research

This article discusses the potential advantages of large scale, government administered workplace surveys and the limitations of these surveys in the past. It then reviews the 1995 AWIRS (Australia), the 1998 WERS (U.K.), and the 1999 WES (Canada) in accordance with how well they appear to have succeeded in overcoming these limitations, and, more generally, with their implications for the conduct of industrial relations (IR) research. It is argued that the 1995 AWIRS does not appreciably overcome the limitations of previous surveys. In contrast, the 1998 WERS has yielded a substantially higher quality data set, although it also does not completely overcome the limitations of its predecessors. Finally, the 1999 WES promises an even higher quality data set, but is primarily a labour market and productivity survey rather than an IR survey, and could even portend a “bad moon rising” for Canadian IR research.

[1]  John Godard,et al.  An industrial relations perspective on the high-performance paradigm , 2001 .

[2]  All change at work , 1987, Nature.

[3]  J. Lane,et al.  The Creation and Analysis of Employer-Employee Matched Data , 1999 .

[4]  Bill Harley,et al.  The Myth of Empowerment: Work Organisation, Hierarchy and Employee Autonomy in Contemporary Australian Workplaces , 1999 .

[5]  John Godard,et al.  Industrial Relations: The Economy And Society , 2000 .

[6]  M. Wooden.  Union Amalgamations and the Decline in Union Density , 1999 .

[7]  M. Cully,et al.  The Workplace Industrial Relations Surveys: Donovan and the Burden of Community , 1995 .

[8]  R. Drago.  Workplace Transformation and the Disposable Workplace: Employee Involvement in Australia , 1996 .

[9]  W. McCarthy.  Of hats and cattle: or the limits of macro‐survey research in industrial relations , 1994 .

[10]  Paul Marginson,et al.  The Survey Tradition in British Industrial Relations Research: an Assessment of the Contribution of Large-Scale Workplace and Enterprise Surveys , 1998 .

[11]  J. Godard.  Managerial Strategies, Labour and Employment Relations and the State: the Canadian Case and Beyond , 1997 .

[12]  S. Wood,et al.  Workplace Industrial Relations in Transition. , 1993 .

[13]  Dora Scholarios,et al.  Employees and High-PerformanceWork Systems:Testinginside the Black Box , 2000 .

[14]  J. Godard,et al.  Reflections on the “High Performance” Paradigm's Implications for Industrial Relations as a Field , 2000 .

[15]  G. Strauss,et al.  Methods Matter: Changes in Industrial Relations Research and their Implications , 2000 .

[16]  D. Lewin,et al.  The New Resource Management in U.S. Workplaces: Is it Really New and is it Only Nonunion? , 1989 .

[17]  Keith Leslie Whitfield,et al.  Unions, Flexibility, Team Working and Financial Performance , 1997 .

[18]  M. Cully,et al.  Britain At Work : As Depicted by the 1998 Workplace Employee Relations Survey , 1999 .

[19]  J. Huisman.  The Netherlands , 1996, The Lancet.

[20]  P. Osterman.  How Common is Workplace Transformation and Who Adopts it? , 1994 .

[21]  Z. Patak,et al.  The Development and Use of a Canadian Linked Employer-Employee Survey , 1999 .

[22]  R. Callus.  The Making of the Australian Workplace Industrial Relations Survey , 1991 .

[23]  Clifford B. Donn,et al.  Industrial relations at work : the Australian workplace industrial relations survey , 1992 .

[24]  John Forth,et al.  All Change at Work?: British employment relations 1980–1998, as portrayed by the Workplace Industrial Relations Survey series , 2000 .

[25]  M. Rimmer.  Enterprise Bargaining, Wage Norms and Productivity , 1998 .

[26]  M. Wooden.  Individual Agreement-Awaking in Australian Workplaces: Incidence, Trends and Features , 1999 .