Using LiDAR to compare forest height estimates from IKONOS and Landsat ETM+ data in Sitka spruce plantation forests

This paper compares and contrasts predictions of forest height in Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) plantations based on medium‐resolution Landsat Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+), high‐resolution IKONOS satellite imagery and airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data. The relationship between field‐measured height and LiDAR height is linear and highly significant (R2 0.98). Despite the difference in spatial resolution and radiometry between Landsat ETM+ and IKONOS multi‐spectral data, the strength of the relationship between field height and predicted height using the green spectral band was very similar, with R2 values of 0.84 and 0.85, respectively. The inclusion of additional observations taken from the LiDAR data improved the strength of the relationship slightly for the Landsat ETM+ data (R2 = 0.87), but did not change the relationship for the IKONOS data (R2 = 0.84). Comparison of the height models derived from the satellite and LiDAR data shows that the optical models provide accurate predictions up to the point of forest canopy closure (10 m) in densely stocked plantations (>2000 stems ha−1); beyond this point, only the LiDAR model is able to provide a reliable estimate of forest height. The results demonstrate that the retrieval of forest structure information over the lifetime of a plantation forest is best achieved by the integration of satellite, airborne and ground‐based measurements. It is possible to use optical satellite data to identify forest stands that display unexpected growth characteristics, such as areas of high natural regeneration, poor or incomplete stocking.

[1]  A. Strahler,et al.  Geometric-Optical Modeling of a Conifer Forest Canopy , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  C. Woodcock,et al.  The factor of scale in remote sensing , 1987 .

[3]  Jonas Ardö,et al.  Volume quantification of coniferous forest compartments using spectral radiance recorded by Landsat Thematic Mapper , 1992 .

[4]  Paul J. Curran,et al.  Factors affecting the remotely sensed response of coniferous forest plantations , 1993 .

[5]  Tiit Nilson,et al.  Age dependence of forest reflectance: Analysis of main driving factors , 1994 .

[6]  M. Philip,et al.  Measuring Trees and Forests , 1994 .

[7]  M. Nilsson Estimation of tree heights and stand volume using an airborne lidar system , 1996 .

[8]  E. Næsset Determination of mean tree height of forest stands using airborne laser scanner data , 1997 .

[9]  Emmanuel P. Baltsavias,et al.  Airborne laser scanning: existing systems and firms and other resources , 1999 .

[10]  J. Means,et al.  Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning lidar , 2000 .

[11]  Daniel N. M. Donoghue,et al.  Remote sensing of upland conifer plantations using Landsat TM data: A case study from Galloway, south-west Scotland , 2000 .

[12]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Accuracy comparison of various remote sensing data sources in the retrieval of forest stand attributes , 2000 .

[13]  Randolph H. Wynne,et al.  Estimating plot-level tree heights with lidar : local filtering with a canopy-height based variable window size , 2002 .

[14]  W. Cohen,et al.  Integration of lidar and Landsat ETM+ data for estimating and mapping forest canopy height , 2002 .

[15]  R. Hill,et al.  Quantifying canopy height underestimation by laser pulse penetration in small-footprint airborne laser scanning data , 2003 .

[16]  M. Wulder,et al.  Forest inventory height update through the integration of lidar data with segmented Landsat imagery , 2003 .

[17]  Pete Watt,et al.  An evaluation of the use of satellite data for monitoring early development of young Sitka spruce plantation forest growth , 2004 .

[18]  Juan C. Suárez,et al.  Use of airborne LiDAR and aerial photography in the estimation of individual tree heights in forestry , 2005, Comput. Geosci..