Technology and knowledge: bridging a "generating" gap

Refuting the notion of technology as a replacement of knowledge, this paper focuses on a gap between them that needs to be bridged. The idea is that technology represents the means, and knowledge the end of a process that includes many explicit and implicit methods for generating knowledge by using technology. Among these methods is data mining (DM), the leading thrust in the effort to gain actionable information from operational databases of organizations; this is particularly evident in direct marketing, customer relationship management (CRM), user profiling, and e-commerce applications.Two models of knowledge are reviewed. The first follows a conventional hierarchy of data, information and knowledge with a spiral and recursive way of generating knowledge. The other presents a reverse hierarchy where knowledge precedes the data-to-information process. The models are compared and discussed in the context of knowledge management (KM), using DM as an example.

[1]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  The Mathematical Theory of Communication , 1950 .

[2]  Codasyl Systems CommitteeCORPORATE Introduction to feature analysis of generalized data base management systems , 1971 .

[3]  RadhaKanta Mahapatra,et al.  Business data mining - a machine learning perspective , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[4]  Israel Spiegler,et al.  Information systems: a construct of transformations , 1995, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[5]  John McCarthy,et al.  What Computers Still Can't Do , 1996, Artif. Intell..

[6]  Lei-da Chen,et al.  Data Mining Methods, Applications, and Tools , 2000, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[7]  Israel Spiegler,et al.  Knowledge Management: A New Idea Or a Recycled Concept? , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Ananth Grama,et al.  Data Mining: From Serendipity to Science - Guest Editors' Introduction , 1999, Computer.

[9]  Terry Winograd,et al.  The Design Interaction , 1997, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[10]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[11]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[12]  André Bourdreau,et al.  Systems Integration and Knowledge Management , 1999, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[13]  K. D. Joshi,et al.  Knowledge manipulation activities: results of a Delphi study , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[14]  Ikujiro Nonaka,et al.  From information processing to knowledge creation: A Paradigm shift in business management , 1996 .

[15]  Edgar H. Sibley,et al.  Feature analysis of generalized data base management systems: CODASYL Systems Committee, May 1971 , 1971 .

[16]  Paul Gray,et al.  Special Section: Data Mining , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  James W. Botkin,et al.  The coming of knowledge-based business , 1999 .

[18]  Jerry Kanter,et al.  Knowledge Management, Practically Speaking , 1999, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[19]  Ilkka Tuomi Data is more than knowledge: implications of the reversed knowledge hierarchy for knowledge management and organizational memory , 1999 .

[20]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[21]  Edmond F. Vail Knowledge Mapping: Getting Started with Knowledge Management , 1999, Inf. Syst. Manag..