Improved border sharpness of post-infarct scar by a novel self-navigated free-breathing high-resolution 3D whole-heart inversion recovery magnetic resonance approach

The border zone of post-infarction myocardial scar as identified by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) has been identified as a substrate for arrhythmias and consequently, high-resolution 3D scar information is potentially useful for planning of electrophysiological interventions. This study evaluates the performance of a novel high-resolution 3D self-navigated free-breathing inversion recovery magnetic resonance pulse sequence (3D-SN-LGE) vs. conventional 2D breath-hold LGE (2D-LGE) with regard to sharpness of borders (SBorder) of post-infarction scar. Patients with post-infarction scar underwent two magnetic resonance examinations for conventional 2D-LGE and high-resolution 3D-SN-LGE acquisitions (both 15 min after 0.2 mmol/kg Gadobutrol IV) at 1.5T. In the prototype 3D-SN-LGE sequence, each ECG-triggered radial steady-state-free-precession read-out segment is preceded by a non-slice-selective inversion pulse. Scar volume and SBorder were assessed on 2D-LGE and matching reconstructed high-resolution 3D-SN-LGE short-axis slices. In 16 patients (four females, 58 ± 10y) all scars visualized by 2D-LGE could be identified on 3D-SN-LGE (time between 2D-LGE and 3D-SN-LGE 48 ± 53 days). A good agreement of scar volume by 3D-SN-LGE vs. 2D-LGE was found (Bland–Altman: −3.7 ± 3.4 ml, correlation: r = 0.987, p < 0.001) with a small difference in scar volume (20.5 (15.8, 35.2) ml vs. 24.5 (20.0, 41.9)) ml, respectively, p = 0.002] and a good intra- and interobserver variability (1.1 ± 4.1 and −1.1 ± 11.9 ml, respectively). SBorder of border “scar to non-infarcted myocardium” was superior on 3D-SN-LGE vs. 2D-LGE: 0.180 ± 0.044 vs. 0.083 ± 0.038, p < 0.001. Detection and quantification of myocardial scar by 3D-SN-LGE is feasible and accurate in comparison to 2D-LGE. The high spatial resolution of the 3D sequence improves delineation of scar borders.

[1]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[2]  Mehmet Akçakaya,et al.  Free‐breathing combined three‐dimensional phase sensitive late gadolinium enhancement and T1 mapping for myocardial tissue characterization , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  Fabian Kording,et al.  Doppler ultrasound compared with electrocardiogram and pulse oximetry cardiac triggering: A pilot study , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  J. Carr,et al.  Assessment of left ventricular myocardial scar in infiltrative and non-ischemic cardiac diseases by free breathing three dimensional phase sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) TurboFLASH , 2011, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[5]  P. Boesiger,et al.  A CMR study of the effects of tissue edema and necrosis on left ventricular dyssynchrony in acute myocardial infarction: implications for cardiac resynchronization therapy , 2012, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[6]  Li Zhang,et al.  High-Resolution 3-D T${{\bf _1}^{\bf *}}$-Mapping and Quantitative Image Analysis of GRAY ZONE in Chronic Fibrosis , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  J. Oshinski,et al.  Imaging Time After Gd-DTPA Injection Is Critical in Using Delayed Enhancement to Determine Infarct Size Accurately With Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2001, Circulation.

[8]  Sebastian Kelle,et al.  Prognostic value of myocardial infarct size and contractile reserve using magnetic resonance imaging. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  Davide Piccini,et al.  Spiral phyllotaxis: The natural way to construct a 3D radial trajectory in MRI , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Jennifer Keegan,et al.  Free-breathing 3D late gadolinium enhancement imaging of the left ventricle using a stack of spirals at 3T , 2014, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  B. Desjardins,et al.  Delayed-enhanced MR scar imaging and intraprocedural registration into an electroanatomical mapping system in post-infarction patients. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[12]  H. Halperin,et al.  Abnormal sympathetic innervation of viable myocardium and the substrate of ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  S. Nielles-Vallespin,et al.  Respiratory self‐navigation for whole‐heart bright‐blood coronary MRI: Methods for robust isolation and automatic segmentation of the blood pool , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  M. Stuber,et al.  Respiratory self-navigated postcontrast whole-heart coronary MR angiography: initial experience in patients. , 2014, Radiology.

[15]  M. Götte,et al.  Interventional Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Electrophysiology: Advances Toward Clinical Translation , 2015, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[16]  O. Simonetti,et al.  The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  G. Lamas,et al.  Ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction. , 1993, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[18]  M. Pfeffer,et al.  Ventricular Remodeling After Myocardial Infarction: Experimental Observations and Clinical Implications , 1990, Circulation.

[19]  Terry M. Peters,et al.  Comparison of semi-automated scar quantification techniques using high-resolution, 3-dimensional late-gadolinium-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging , 2015, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[20]  René M. Botnar,et al.  Impact of navigator timing on free‐breathing submillimeter 3D coronary magnetic resonance angiography , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  Matthias Stuber,et al.  Single centre experience of the application of self navigated 3D whole heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the assessment of cardiac anatomy in congenital heart disease , 2015, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[22]  Reza Nezafat,et al.  Left ventricular infarct size, peri‐infarct zone, and papillary scar measurements: A comparison of high‐resolution 3D and conventional 2D late gadolinium enhancement cardiac MR , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[23]  P. Börnert,et al.  Free-breathing cardiac MR imaging: study of implications of respiratory motion--initial results. , 2001, Radiology.

[24]  G. V. von Schulthess,et al.  Characterization of Dysfunctional Myocardium by Positron Emission Tomography and Magnetic Resonance: Relation to Functional Outcome After Revascularization , 2003, Circulation.

[25]  D. Pennell,et al.  Ventricular Fibrosis Suggested by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Adults With Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot and Its Relationship to Adverse Markers of Clinical Outcome , 2006, Circulation.

[26]  J. Brugada,et al.  Usefulness of contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance in identifying the ventricular arrhythmia substrate and the approach needed for ablation. , 2014, European heart journal.

[27]  Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh,et al.  Cardiac MRI: a central prognostic tool in myocardial fibrosis , 2015, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[28]  J. Kastrup,et al.  Short- and long-term changes in myocardial function, morphology, edema, and infarct mass after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction evaluated by serial magnetic resonance imaging. , 2007, American heart journal.

[29]  Maria Drangova,et al.  Prediction of Arrhythmic Events in Ischemic and Dilated Cardiomyopathy Patients Referred for Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator: Evaluation of Multiple Scar Quantification Measures for Late Gadolinium Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2012, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[30]  R. Kwong,et al.  Measuring myocardial scar by CMR. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[31]  M. Miyagawa,et al.  Three-dimensional phase-sensitive inversion recovery sequencing in the evaluation of left ventricular myocardial scars in ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: comparison to three-dimensional inversion recovery sequencing. , 2014, European journal of radiology.

[32]  G. Koren,et al.  A novel, minimally invasive, segmental myocardial infarction with a clear healed infarct borderzone in rabbits. , 2012, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[33]  E. McVeigh,et al.  Phase‐sensitive inversion recovery for detecting myocardial infarction using gadolinium‐delayed hyperenhancement † , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[34]  P. Börnert,et al.  Free‐breathing whole‐heart coronary MRA with 3D radial SSFP and self‐navigated image reconstruction , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[35]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[36]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Measurement of signal‐to‐noise ratios in MR images: Influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[37]  James A. White,et al.  Prevalence of Myocardial Fibrosis Patterns in Patients With Systolic Dysfunction: Prognostic Significance for the Prediction of Sudden Cardiac Arrest or Appropriate Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator Therapy , 2014, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[38]  S. Plein,et al.  Timing of cardiovascular MR imaging after acute myocardial infarction: effect on estimates of infarct characteristics and prediction of late ventricular remodeling. , 2011, Radiology.

[39]  Hiroshi Ashikaga,et al.  The critical isthmus sites of ischemic ventricular tachycardia are in zones of tissue heterogeneity, visualized by magnetic resonance imaging. , 2011, Heart rhythm.

[40]  R. Kwong,et al.  Incidence and Prognostic Implication of Unrecognized Myocardial Scar Characterized by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Diabetic Patients Without Clinical Evidence of Myocardial Infarction , 2008, Circulation.

[41]  R. Kwong,et al.  Cardiovascular imaging in clinical practice: what does late gadolinium enhance? , 2013, JAMA.

[42]  Bernard Y Ho,et al.  A fast navigator‐gated 3D sequence for delayed enhancement MRI of the myocardium: Comparison with breathhold 2D imaging , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.