Antiphasic electromyographic activities between biarticular arm muscles reflects improved two joint arm movement performaces in stroke patients

Antiphasic electromyographic (EMG) activities between biarticular arm muscles are indispensable for smooth performance. In the case of two-joint arm movement in a planar horizontal plane, elbow and shoulder joint movements were achieved by the biceps brachii (BB) and the triceps brachii muscles (TB). To our knowledge, however, no conclusions have been reached concerning the antiphasic EMG activities between biarticular arm muscles during two-joint arm movements in stroke patients and the effects of training in paretic upper limbs. The objective of this study was to investigate whether or not the antiphasic EMG activities with the BB and the TB muscles were restored in stroke patients by repetitive two-joint arm movements. Three stroke patients performed point-to-point movement (PTP) and circle-drawing (Circle) tasks 20 minutes daily for 10 days. The movement velocity and achievement periods increased after training for the same duration. After the training, antiphasic EMG activities between the BB and the TB appeared. The increased movement velocities played a major contribution in increasing the antiphasic EMG activities and improving positional precision. These results suggested that stroke patients could achieve motor performance to move their wrists fast and precisely by practicing a two-joint arm movement, especially, circle drawing.

[1]  W. Rymer,et al.  Characteristics of synergic relations during isometric contractions of human elbow muscles. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  M. Flanders,et al.  Arm muscle activation for static forces in three-dimensional space. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  A. Dromerick,et al.  Does the Application of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy During Acute Rehabilitation Reduce Arm Impairment After Ischemic Stroke? , 2000, Stroke.

[4]  R L Hewer,et al.  Enhanced physical therapy for arm function after stroke: a one year follow up study. , 1994, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[5]  A. Schwartz,et al.  Motor cortical activity during drawing movements: population representation during lemniscate tracing. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  A. Schwartz,et al.  Motor cortical activity during drawing movements: population representation during lemniscate tracing. , 1999 .

[7]  F. Zajac,et al.  Locomotor strategy for pedaling: muscle groups and biomechanical functions. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Takashi Komeda,et al.  Haptic Device System For Upper Limb Motor Impairment Patients: Developing And Handling In Healthy Subjects , 2007 .

[9]  N. Hogan An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  E. Taub,et al.  Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: a replication. , 1999, Stroke.

[11]  Lumy Sawaki,et al.  Effects of Somatosensory Stimulation on Use-Dependent Plasticity in Chronic Stroke , 2006, Stroke.

[12]  N B Lincoln,et al.  Randomized, controlled trial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of arm function after stroke. , 1999, Stroke.

[13]  N. Hogan,et al.  Movement Smoothness Changes during Stroke Recovery , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  Kimitaka Nakazawa,et al.  Muscle activity determined by cosine tuning with a nontrivial preferred direction during isometric force exertion by lower limb. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.