Simulation of long-term landscape-level fuel treatment effects on large wildfires

A simulation system was developed to explore how fuel treatments placed in topologically random and optimal spatial patterns affect the growth and behaviour of large fires when implemented at different rates over the course of five decades. The system consisted of a forest and fuel dynamics simulation module (Forest Vegetation Simulator, FVS), logic for deriving fuel model dynamics from FVS output, a spatial fuel treatment optimisation program, and a spatial fire growth and behaviour model to evaluate the performance of the treatments in modifying large fire growth. Simulations were performed for three study areas: Sanders County in western Montana, the Stanislaus National Forest in California, and the Blue Mountains in south-eastern Washington. For different spatial treatment strategies, the results illustrated that the rate of fuel treatment (percentage of land area treated per decade) competes against the rates of fuel recovery to determine how fuel treatments contribute to multidecade cumulative impacts on the response variables. Using fuel treatment prescriptions that simulate thinning and prescribed burning, fuel treatment arrangements that are optimal in disrupting the growth of large fires require at least 1 to 2% of the landscape to be treated each year. Randomly arranged units with the same treatment prescriptions require about twice that rate to produce the same fire growth reduction. The results also show that the topological fuel treatment optimisation tends to balance maintenance of previous units with treatment of new units. For example, with 2% landscape treatment annually, fewer than 5% of the units received three or more treatments in five decades with most being treated only once or twice and ~35% remaining untreated after five decades.

[1]  Carl N. Skinner,et al.  Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments , 2005 .

[2]  Mark A. Finney,et al.  A computational method for optimising fuel treatment locations , 2006 .

[3]  William H. McWilliams,et al.  Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Forest Inventory and Analysis Symposium Meeting jointly with the Southern Forest Mensurationists , 2004 .

[4]  Mark A. Finney,et al.  Calculation of fire spread rates across random landscapes , 2003 .

[5]  William C. Fischer,et al.  Photo guide for appraising downed woody fuels in Montana forests: Grand fir - larch - Douglas-fir, western hemlock, western redcedar - western hemlock, and western redcedar cover types , 1981 .

[6]  Charles W. McHugh,et al.  Stand- and landscape-level effects of prescribed burning on two Arizona wildfires , 2005 .

[7]  Jerry F. Franklin,et al.  Forest Restoration and Fire: Principles in the Context of Place , 2004 .

[8]  Mark A. Finney,et al.  The challenge of quantitative risk analysis for wildland fire , 2005 .

[9]  Philip N. Omi,et al.  The use of shaded fuelbreaks in landscape fire management. , 2000 .

[10]  Jason J. Moghaddas,et al.  Silvicultural and reserve impacts on potential fire behavior and forest conservation: Twenty-five years of experience from Sierra Nevada mixed conifer forests , 2005 .

[11]  W. C. Fischer.  Photo guide for appraising downed woody fuels in Montana forests: Interior ponderosa pine, ponderosa pine - larch - Douglas-fir, larch - Douglas-fir, and interior Douglas-fir cover types , 1981 .

[12]  Nicholas L. Crookston,et al.  Users guide to the Most Similar Neighbor Imputation Program Version 2 , 2002 .

[13]  D. Cram,et al.  Wildland Fire Effects in Silviculturally Treated vs. Untreated Stands of New Mexico and Arizona , 2006 .

[14]  Joe H. Scott,et al.  Assessing Crown Fire Potential by Linking Models of Surface and Crown Fire Behavior , 2003 .

[15]  J. Agee,et al.  SPATIAL CONTROLS OF HISTORICAL FIRE REGIMES: A MULTISCALE EXAMPLE FROM THE INTERIOR WEST, USA , 2001 .

[16]  Scott L. Stephens,et al.  Evaluation of the effects of silvicultural and fuels treatments on potential fire behaviour in Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forests , 1998 .

[17]  Russell T. Graham,et al.  Hayman Fire Case Study , 2003 .

[18]  Paulo M. Fernandes,et al.  A review of prescribed burning effectiveness in fire hazard reduction , 2003 .

[19]  Fuel Management: A Prerequisite Not an Alternative to Fire Control , 2006 .

[20]  H. Anderson.  Aids to Determining Fuel Models for Estimating Fire Behavior , 1982 .

[21]  Nicholas L. Crookston,et al.  An overview of the fire and fuels extension to the forest vegetation simulator , 2000 .

[22]  A. Ager,et al.  Methods for integrated modeling of landscape change: Interior Northwest Landscape Analysis System. , 2004 .

[23]  Craig Loehle,et al.  Applying landscape principles to fire hazard reduction , 2004 .

[24]  David R. Brillinger,et al.  Probability based models for estimation of wildfire risk , 2004 .

[25]  Russell T. Graham,et al.  The effects of thinning and similar stand treatments on fire behavior in Western forests. , 1999 .

[26]  J. Boone Kauffman,et al.  Use of prescribed fire to reduce wildfire potential , 1989 .

[27]  D. Peterson,et al.  Fuel treatments alter the effects of wildfire in a mixed-evergreen forest, Oregon, USA , 2005 .

[28]  IN THE WHITE MOUNTAINS OF ARIZONA , 1967 .

[29]  P. Fernandes,et al.  Fire behaviour and severity in a maritime pine stand under differing fuel conditions , 2004 .

[30]  M. Finney.  Design of Regular Landscape Fuel Treatment Patterns for Modifying Fire Growth and Behavior , 2001, Forest Science.

[31]  J. N. Westwood,et al.  PACIFIC SOUTHWEST Forest and Range Experiment Station , 1970 .

[32]  Philip N. Omi,et al.  Random location of fuel treatments in wildland community interfaces: a percolation approach , 2004 .

[33]  Nicholas L. Crookston,et al.  User's guide to the stand prognosis model / , 1982 .

[34]  J. E. Deeming.  National Fire-Danger Rating System / , 1972 .

[35]  K. Hirsch,et al.  Fire-smart forest management: A pragmatic approach to sustainable forest management in fire-dominated ecosystems , 2001 .

[36]  P. Alaback,et al.  Evaluating risks and benefits of wildland fire at landscape scales , 2000 .

[37]  Sarah McCaffrey,et al.  Science basis for changing forest structure to modify wildfire behavior and severity , 2004 .

[38]  W. C. Fischer,et al.  Fire ecology of the forest habitat types of northern Idaho , 1997 .

[39]  Harold R. Weaver.  Fire As An Ecological and Silvicultural Factor in the Ponderosa-Pine Region of the Pacific Slope , 1943 .

[40]  D. X. Viegas,et al.  Use of graph theory and a genetic algorithm for finding optimal fuel treatment locations. , 2002 .

[41]  C. Skinner,et al.  Fire regimes, past and present , 1996 .

[42]  Jan W. Van Wagtendonk,et al.  Use of a Deterministic Fire Growth Model to Test Fuel Treatments , 1996 .

[43]  M. Finney.  FARSITE : Fire Area Simulator : model development and evaluation , 1998 .

[44]  K. Blonski,et al.  Photo series for quantifying natural forest residues: southern Cascades and northern Sierra Nevada , 1981 .

[45]  Philip N. Omi,et al.  Effect of thinning and prescribed burning on crown fire severity in ponderosa pine forests , 2002 .

[46]  A. R. Stage,et al.  User's guide to the Parallel Processing Extension of the Prognosis Model , 1991 .

[47]  J. Geist,et al.  Suggested stocking levels for forest stands in northeastern Oregon and southeastern Washington. Forest Service research note , 1994 .

[48]  G. Reams,et al.  Proceedings of the fifth annual forest inventory and analysis symposium , 2005 .

[49]  M. Finney.  Fire growth using minimum travel time methods , 2002 .