QQS orphan gene and its interactor NF‐YC4 reduce susceptibility to pathogens and pests

Summary Enhancing the nutritional quality and disease resistance of crops without sacrificing productivity is a key issue for developing varieties that are valuable to farmers and for simultaneously improving food security and sustainability. Expression of the Arabidopsis thaliana species‐specific AtQQS (Qua‐Quine Starch) orphan gene or its interactor, NF‐YC4 (Nuclear Factor Y, subunit C4), has been shown to increase levels of leaf/seed protein without affecting the growth and yield of agronomic species. Here, we demonstrate that overexpression of AtQQS and NF‐YC4 in Arabidopsis and soybean enhances resistance/reduces susceptibility to viruses, bacteria, fungi, aphids and soybean cyst nematodes. A series of Arabidopsis mutants in starch metabolism were used to explore the relationships between QQS expression, carbon and nitrogen partitioning, and defense. The enhanced basal defenses mediated by QQS were independent of changes in protein/carbohydrate composition of the plants. We demonstrate that either AtQQS or NF‐YC4 overexpression in Arabidopsis and in soybean reduces susceptibility of these plants to pathogens/pests. Transgenic soybean lines overexpressing NF‐YC4 produce seeds with increased protein while maintaining healthy growth. Pull‐down studies reveal that QQS interacts with human NF‐YC, as well as with Arabidopsis NF‐YC4, and indicate two QQS binding sites near the NF‐YC‐histone‐binding domain. A new model for QQS interaction with NF‐YC is speculated. Our findings illustrate the potential of QQS and NF‐YC4 to increase protein and improve defensive traits in crops, overcoming the normal growth‐defense trade‐offs.

[1]  A. Iyer-Pascuzzi,et al.  Mechanisms of quantitative disease resistance in plants. , 2016, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[2]  M. Bolton.  Primary metabolism and plant defense--fuel for the fire. , 2009, Molecular plant-microbe interactions : MPMI.

[3]  F. Ausubel,et al.  Plant immunity triggered by engineered in vivo release of oligogalacturonides, damage-associated molecular patterns , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Eve Syrkin Wurtele,et al.  The QQS orphan gene of Arabidopsis modulates carbon and nitrogen allocation in soybean , 2014, Plant biotechnology journal.

[5]  Christoph Benning,et al.  New Connections across Pathways and Cellular Processes: Industrialized Mutant Screening Reveals Novel Associations between Diverse Phenotypes in Arabidopsis1[W][OA] , 2008, Plant Physiology.

[6]  Jonathan D. G. Jones,et al.  Interfamily transfer of a plant pattern-recognition receptor confers broad-spectrum bacterial resistance , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[7]  R. L. Blackman,et al.  Aphids on the World's Crops: An Identification and Information Guide , 1984 .

[8]  R. Shimizu,et al.  A Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato avrE1/hopM1 mutant is severely reduced in growth and lesion formation in tomato. , 2006, Molecular plant-microbe interactions : MPMI.

[9]  M. Reichelt,et al.  Modulation of flavonoid metabolites in Arabidopsis thaliana through overexpression of the MYB75 transcription factor: role of kaempferol-3,7-dirhamnoside in resistance to the specialist insect herbivore Pieris brassicae , 2014, Journal of experimental botany.

[10]  V. Planchot,et al.  Further Evidence for the Mandatory Nature of Polysaccharide Debranching for the Aggregation of Semicrystalline Starch and for Overlapping Functions of Debranching Enzymes in Arabidopsis Leaves1[W] , 2008, Plant Physiology.

[11]  C. M. De Moraes,et al.  Roles of ethylene and jasmonic acid in systemic induced defense in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) against Helicoverpa zea , 2013, Planta.

[12]  César A. Hidalgo,et al.  Proto-genes and de novo gene birth , 2012, Nature.

[13]  R. Croteau,et al.  Defense mechanisms of conifers : differences in constitutive and wound-induced monoterpene biosynthesis among species. , 1991, Plant physiology.

[14]  Hongwei Guo,et al.  Jasmonate-Activated MYC2 Represses ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE3 Activity to Antagonize Ethylene-Promoted Apical Hook Formation in Arabidopsis[C][W] , 2014, The Plant Cell.

[15]  R. Nelson,et al.  Shades of gray: the world of quantitative disease resistance. , 2009, Trends in plant science.

[16]  J. A. Ryals,et al.  Coordinate Gene Activity in Response to Agents That Induce Systemic Acquired Resistance. , 1991, The Plant cell.

[17]  Jonathan D. G. Jones,et al.  The plant immune system , 2006, Nature.

[18]  D. Nettleton,et al.  Soybean Homologs of MPK4 Negatively Regulate Defense Responses and Positively Regulate Growth and Development1[W][OA] , 2011, Plant Physiology.

[19]  Dan Nettleton,et al.  Spatial analysis of arabidopsis thaliana gene expression in response to Turnip mosaic virus infection. , 2007, Molecular plant-microbe interactions : MPMI.

[20]  E. Huitema,et al.  Active defence responses associated with non-host resistance of Arabidopsis thaliana to the oomycete pathogen Phytophthora infestans. , 2003, Molecular plant pathology.

[21]  T. Qi,et al.  Interaction between MYC2 and ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE3 Modulates Antagonism between Jasmonate and Ethylene Signaling in Arabidopsis[C][W] , 2014, Plant Cell.

[22]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  Tomato responds to green peach aphid infestation with the activation of trehalose metabolism and starch accumulation , 2012, Plant signaling & behavior.

[23]  Andrew J. Heidel,et al.  Fitness Costs of Mutations Affecting the Systemic Acquired Resistance Pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2004, Genetics.

[24]  Murray Grant,et al.  Hormone crosstalk in plant disease and defense: more than just jasmonate-salicylate antagonism. , 2011, Annual review of phytopathology.

[25]  E. Bornberg-Bauer,et al.  Mechanisms and Dynamics of Orphan Gene Emergence in Insect Genomes , 2013, Genome biology and evolution.

[26]  M. Nardini,et al.  Sequence-Specific Transcription Factor NF-Y Displays Histone-like DNA Binding and H2B-like Ubiquitination , 2013, Cell.

[27]  Yan Zhang,et al.  NF-YC3, NF-YC4 and NF-YC9 are required for CONSTANS-mediated, photoperiod-dependent flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana. , 2010, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[28]  D F Klessig,et al.  The cpr5 mutant of Arabidopsis expresses both NPR1-dependent and NPR1-independent resistance. , 1997, The Plant cell.

[29]  Thomas Girke,et al.  What makes species unique? The contribution of proteins with obscure features , 2006, Genome Biology.

[30]  A. Myers,et al.  Mutations Affecting Starch Synthase III in Arabidopsis Alter Leaf Starch Structure and Increase the Rate of Starch Synthesis1 , 2005, Plant Physiology.

[31]  S. He,et al.  Growth-defense tradeoffs in plants: a balancing act to optimize fitness. , 2014, Molecular plant.

[32]  D. Nettleton,et al.  From Arabidopsis to Crops: The Arabidopsis QQS Orphan Gene Modulates Nitrogen Allocation Across Species , 2018 .

[33]  W. Kaiser,et al.  Reduced growth and seed set following chemical induction of pathogen defence: does systemic acquired resistance (SAR) incur allocation costs? , 2000 .

[34]  Manash S. Chatterjee,et al.  Soluble starch synthase I: a major determinant for the synthesis of amylopectin in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves. , 2005, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[35]  Sheng Yang He,et al.  Genome-wide transcriptional analysis of the Arabidopsis thaliana interaction with the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 and the human pathogen Escherichia coli O157:H7. , 2006, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[36]  D. Klessig,et al.  Uncoupling PR Gene Expression from NPR1 and Bacterial Resistance: Characterization of the Dominant Arabidopsis cpr6-1 Mutant , 1998, Plant Cell.

[37]  Christophe Romier,et al.  The NF-YB/NF-YC Structure Gives Insight into DNA Binding and Transcription Regulation by CCAAT Factor NF-Y* , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[38]  D. Nettleton,et al.  QQS orphan gene regulates carbon and nitrogen partitioning across species via NF-YC interactions , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  M. Fornari,et al.  The Promiscuous Life of Plant NUCLEAR FACTOR Y Transcription Factors[W] , 2012, Plant Cell.

[40]  V. Petersen.  Effect of Energy-Requiring Defense Reactions on Yield and Grain Quality in a Powdery Mildew-Resistant Barley Cultivar , 1981 .

[41]  V. Smedegaard-Petersen.  Effect of Energy-Requiring Defense Reactions on Yield and Grain Quality in a Powdery Mildew-Resistant Barley Cultivar , 1981 .

[42]  I. Baldwin,et al.  RuBPCase activase (RCA) mediates growth-defense trade-offs: silencing RCA redirects jasmonic acid (JA) flux from JA-isoleucine to methyl jasmonate (MeJA) to attenuate induced defense responses in Nicotiana attenuata. , 2014, The New phytologist.

[43]  B. Moore.  Growth-Defense Tradeoffs in Plants: A Balancing Act to Optimize Fitness , 2014 .

[44]  Jyoti Shah,et al.  The salicylic acid loop in plant defense. , 2003, Current opinion in plant biology.

[45]  Y. Choi,et al.  Jasmonic acid carboxyl methyltransferase: A key enzyme for jasmonate-regulated plant responses , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  S. Chisholm,et al.  Host-Microbe Interactions: Shaping the Evolution of the Plant Immune Response , 2022 .

[47]  M. Zanetti,et al.  Transcriptional regulators of legume-rhizobia symbiosis , 2014, Plant signaling & behavior.

[48]  Floriane L’Haridon,et al.  The cuticle and plant defense to pathogens , 2014, Front. Plant Sci..

[49]  A. Niebel,et al.  CCAAT-box binding transcription factors in plants: Y so many? , 2013, Trends in plant science.

[50]  Murray Grant,et al.  Type III effectors orchestrate a complex interplay between transcriptional networks to modify basal defence responses during pathogenesis and resistance. , 2006, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[51]  J. Schultz,et al.  Fitness costs of jasmonic acid-induced defense in tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum , 2001, Oecologia.

[52]  I. Baldwin,et al.  Fitness costs of induced resistance: emerging experimental support for a slippery concept. , 2002, Trends in plant science.

[53]  J. Reese,et al.  TREHALOSE PHOSPHATE SYNTHASE11-dependent trehalose metabolism promotes Arabidopsis thaliana defense against the phloem-feeding insect Myzus persicae. , 2011, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[54]  Xiong-Yan Chen,et al.  Callose synthesis in higher plants , 2009, Plant signaling & behavior.

[55]  S. Clough,et al.  The Arabidopsis dnd1 "defense, no death" gene encodes a mutated cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  E. Ward,et al.  Improving immunity in crops: new tactics in an old game. , 2011, Current opinion in plant biology.

[57]  Eve Syrkin Wurtele,et al.  Identification of the novel protein QQS as a component of the starch metabolic network in Arabidopsis leaves. , 2009, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[58]  T. Girke,et al.  Linking genes of unknown function with abiotic stress responses by high-throughput phenotype screening. , 2013, Physiologia plantarum.

[59]  A. Bent,et al.  Signaling pathways that regulate the enhanced disease resistance of Arabidopsis "defense, no death" mutants. , 2008, Molecular plant-microbe interactions : MPMI.

[60]  A. Tauzin,et al.  Sucrose and invertases, a part of the plant defense response to the biotic stresses , 2014, Front. Plant Sci..

[61]  E. Hodgson,et al.  Biology of the Soybean Aphid, Aphis glycines (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in the United States , 2011 .

[62]  U. Conrath,et al.  Priming for enhanced defense. , 2015, Annual review of phytopathology.

[63]  Eve Syrkin Wurtele,et al.  Coming of age: orphan genes in plants. , 2014, Trends in plant science.

[64]  R. Solano,et al.  Repression of Jasmonate-Dependent Defenses by Shade Involves Differential Regulation of Protein Stability of MYC Transcription Factors and Their JAZ Repressors in Arabidopsis[C][W] , 2014, Plant Cell.

[65]  T. G.L.,et al.  A Revised Classification Scheme for Genetically Diverse Populations of Heterodera glycines , 2003 .