Turbulent flow over superhydrophobic surfaces with streamwise grooves

Abstract We investigate the effects of superhydrophobic surfaces (SHS) carrying streamwise grooves on the flow dynamics and the resultant drag reduction in a fully developed turbulent channel flow. The SHS is modelled as a flat boundary with alternating no-slip and free-slip conditions, and a series of direct numerical simulations is performed with systematically changing the spanwise periodicity of the streamwise grooves. In all computations, a constant pressure gradient condition is employed, so that the drag reduction effect is manifested by an increase of the bulk mean velocity. To capture the flow properties that are induced by the non-homogeneous boundary conditions the instantaneous turbulent flow is decomposed into the spatial-mean, coherent and random components. It is observed that the alternating no-slip and free-slip boundary conditions lead to the generation of Prandtl’s second kind of secondary flow characterized by coherent streamwise vortices. A mathematical relationship between the bulk mean velocity and different dynamical contributions, i.e. the effective slip length and additional turbulent losses over slip surfaces, reveals that the increase of the bulk mean velocity is mainly governed by the effective slip length. For a small spanwise periodicity of the streamwise grooves, the effective slip length in a turbulent flow agrees well with the analytical solution for laminar flows. Once the spanwise width of the free-slip area becomes larger than approximately 20 wall units, however, the effective slip length is significantly reduced from the laminar value due to the mixing caused by the underlying turbulence and secondary flow. Based on these results, we develop a simple model that allows estimating the gain due to a SHS in turbulent flows at practically high Reynolds numbers.

[1]  J. Rothstein Slip on Superhydrophobic Surfaces , 2010 .

[2]  N. Kasagi,et al.  Effects of Interfacial Velocity Boundary Condition on Turbulent Mass Transfer at High Schmidt Numbers , 2007 .

[3]  Philippe R. Spalart,et al.  Drag reduction: enticing turbulence, and then an industry , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[4]  Koji Fukagata,et al.  Contribution of Reynolds stress distribution to the skin friction in wall-bounded flows , 2002 .

[5]  N. Kasagi,et al.  On the Friction Drag Reduction Effect by a Control of Large-Scale Turbulent Structures , 2010 .

[6]  Mohamed Gad-el-Hak,et al.  Flow Control: Passive, Active, and Reactive Flow Management , 2000 .

[7]  N. Sandham,et al.  Influence of an anisotropic slip-length boundary condition on turbulent channel flow , 2012 .

[8]  John Kim,et al.  Effects of hydrophobic surface on skin-friction drag , 2004 .

[9]  A. Cassie,et al.  Wettability of porous surfaces , 1944 .

[10]  J. Blair Perot,et al.  Direct numerical simulations of turbulent flows over superhydrophobic surfaces , 2008, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[11]  Maurizio Quadrio,et al.  Money versus time: evaluation of flow control in terms of energy consumption and convenience , 2012, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  Yang Moon Koh,et al.  Turbulent Flow near a Wall , 1991 .

[13]  N. Kasagi,et al.  Effects of spatially varying slip length on friction drag reduction in wall turbulence , 2011 .

[14]  B. W. Webb,et al.  Laminar flow in a microchannel with hydrophobic surface patterned microribs oriented parallel to the flow direction , 2007 .

[15]  Krishnan Mahesh,et al.  Laminar and turbulent comparisons for channel flow and flow control , 2006, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[16]  J. Nikuradse Untersuchungen über die Geschwindigkeitsverteilung in Turbulenten Strömungen , 1926 .

[17]  J. R. Philip Flows satisfying mixed no-slip and no-shear conditions , 1972 .

[18]  P. Moin,et al.  Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number , 1987, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[19]  Howard A. Stone,et al.  Effective slip in pressure-driven Stokes flow , 2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[20]  Blair Perot,et al.  Laminar drag reduction in microchannels using ultrahydrophobic surfaces , 2004 .

[21]  Fazle Hussain,et al.  A large-scale control strategy for drag reduction in turbulent boundary layers , 1998 .

[22]  J. B. Perot,et al.  An analysis of superhydrophobic turbulent drag reduction mechanisms using direct numerical simulation , 2010 .

[23]  D. Goldstein,et al.  Secondary flow induced by riblets , 1998, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[24]  Petros Koumoutsakos,et al.  A theoretical prediction of friction drag reduction in turbulent flow by superhydrophobic surfaces , 2006 .

[25]  B. W. Webb,et al.  Liquid flow through microchannels with grooved walls under wetting and superhydrophobic conditions , 2009 .

[26]  A. Hussain,et al.  The mechanics of an organized wave in turbulent shear flow. Part 3. Theoretical models and comparisons with experiments , 1972, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[27]  Jonathan P. Rothstein,et al.  Drag reduction in turbulent flows over superhydrophobic surfaces , 2009 .