A rapid evidence-based service by librarians provided information to answer primary care clinical questions.

BACKGROUND A librarian consultation service was offered to 88 primary care clinicians during office hours. This included a streamlined evidence-based process to answer questions in fewer than 20 min. This included a contact centre accessed through a Web-based platform and using hand-held devices and computers with Web access. Librarians were given technical training in evidence-based medicine, including how to summarise evidence. OBJECTIVES To describe the process and lessons learned from developing and operating a rapid response librarian consultation service for primary care clinicians. METHODS Evaluation included librarian interviews and a clinician exit satisfaction survey. RESULTS Clinicians were positive about its impact on their clinical practice and decision making. The project revealed some important 'lessons learned' in the clinical use of hand-held devices, knowledge translation and training for clinicians and librarians. CONCLUSIONS The Just-in-Time Librarian Consultation Service showed that it was possible to provide evidence-based answers to clinical questions in 15 min or less. The project overcame a number of barriers using innovative solutions. There are many opportunities to build on this experience for future joint projects of librarians and healthcare providers.

[1]  Gordon H. Guyatt,et al.  Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: I. How to Get Started , 1993 .

[2]  Jessie McGowan,et al.  Just-in-Time Information Improved Decision-Making in Primary Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2008, PloS one.

[3]  Dorothy Curtis,et al.  Chasing the sun: a virtual reference service between SAHSLC (SA) and SWICE (UK). , 2005, Health information and libraries journal.

[4]  P. Martin,et al.  An informaticist working in primary care: a descriptive study , 2001 .

[5]  Ellen Fineout-Overholt,et al.  Users' Guides to the Medical Literature , 2002 .

[6]  Aaron E. Carroll,et al.  Pediatricians and Personal Digital Assistants: What type are they using? , 2003, AMIA.

[7]  A. Verhoeven,et al.  Effect of an evidence-based answering service on GPs and their patients: a pilot study. , 2004, Health information and libraries journal.

[8]  Avishai Mandelbaum,et al.  Queueing Models of Call Centers: An Introduction , 2002, Ann. Oper. Res..

[9]  William A. Katz,et al.  Introduction to reference work , 1969 .

[10]  P. Glasziou,et al.  Feasibility of an evidence‐based literature search service for general practitioners , 2001, The Medical journal of Australia.

[11]  M Pierce,et al.  A clinical informaticist to support primary care decision making , 2001, Quality in health care : QHC.

[12]  C. Silagy,et al.  Providing evidence‐based answers to clinical questions A pilot information service for general practitioners , 1999, The Medical journal of Australia.

[13]  Marie T Ascher,et al.  Asked and Answered-Online , 2004, Medical reference services quarterly.

[14]  Jenny Field,et al.  General practitioners' perceptions of the route to evidence based medicine: a questionnaire survey , 1998, BMJ.

[15]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  A comparative case study of two models of a clinical informaticist service , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  P Kinnersley,et al.  Just in time information for clinicians: a questionnaire evaluation of the ATTRACT project , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  W. Richardson,et al.  The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions. , 1995, ACP journal club.

[18]  D. Baumgart Personal digital assistants in health care: experienced clinicians in the palm of your hand? , 2005, The Lancet.

[19]  Oliver Samuel,et al.  Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM (2nd edn). , 2000 .