Actual and perceived exposure to electromagnetic fields and non-specific physical symptoms: an epidemiological study based on self-reported data and electronic medical records.

BACKGROUND There is continuing scientific debate and increasing public concern regarding the possible effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF) on general population's health. To date, no epidemiological study has investigated the possible association between actual and perceived EMF exposure and non-specific physical symptoms (NSPS) and sleep quality, using both self-reported and general practice (GP)-registered data. METHODS A health survey of adult (≥ 18) participants (n=5933) in the Netherlands was combined with the electronic medical records (EMRs) of NSPS as registered by general practitioners. Characterization of actual exposure was based on several proxies, such as prediction models of radiofrequency (RF)-EMF exposure, geo-coded distance to high-voltage overhead power lines and self-reported use/distance of/to indoor electrical appliances. Perceived exposure and the role of psychological variables were also examined. RESULTS Perceived exposure had a poor correlation with the actual exposure estimates. No significant association was found between modeled RF-EMF exposure and the investigated outcomes. Associations with NSPS were observed for use of an electric blanket and close distance to an electric charger during sleep. Perceived exposure, perceived control and avoidance behavior were associated with the examined outcomes. The association between perceived exposure was stronger for self-reported than for GP-registered NSPS. There was some indication, but no consistent pattern for an interaction between idiopathic environmental intolerance (IEI-EMF) and the association between actual exposure and NSPS. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, there is no convincing evidence for an association between everyday life RF-EMF exposure and NSPS and sleep quality in the population. Better exposure characterization, in particular with respect to sources of extremely low frequency magnetic fields (ELF-MF) is needed to draw more solid conclusions. We argue that perceived exposure is an independent determinant of NSPS.

[1]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[2]  Stephen J Genuis,et al.  Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: fact or fiction? , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[3]  C Bridges-Webb,et al.  An international glossary for general/family practice. , 1995, Family practice.

[4]  Geza Benke,et al.  Comparison of measuring instruments for radiofrequency radiation from mobile telephones in epidemiological studies: Implications for exposure assessment , 2008, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[5]  I. Okkes,et al.  [The clinical relationship between symptoms and the final diagnosis in general practice, determined by means of posterior probabilities calculated on the basis of the Transition Project]. , 2005, Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde.

[6]  Sense and sensibility in the context of radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure , 2010 .

[7]  A. Ahlbom.  Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz) , 1998 .

[8]  J. Bolte,et al.  Calibration and uncertainties in personal exposure measurements of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields , 2011, Bioelectromagnetics.

[9]  Simon Mann,et al.  Assessing personal exposures to environmental radiofrequency electromagnetic fields , 2010 .

[10]  Ulrich Frick,et al.  Risk perception, somatization, and self report of complaints related to electromagnetic fields--a randomized survey study. , 2002, International journal of hygiene and environmental health.

[11]  G. Bárdos,et al.  Polluted places or polluted minds? An experimental sham-exposure study on background psychological factors of symptom formation in 'Idiophatic Environmental Intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields'. , 2010, International journal of hygiene and environmental health.

[12]  J. Kelsey,et al.  Household appliance use and residential exposure to 60-Hz magnetic fields , 2001, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[13]  GSM base stations: Short‐term effects on well‐being , 2009, Bioelectromagnetics.

[14]  Katja Radon,et al.  Personal exposure to mobile phone frequencies and well‐being in adults: A cross‐sectional study based on dosimetry , 2008, Bioelectromagnetics.

[15]  Comment: childhood leukaemia and power lines – the Geocap study: is proximity an appropriate MF exposure surrogate? , 2013, British Journal of Cancer.

[16]  W. Rief,et al.  Modern health worries in medical students. , 2005, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[17]  B. Langguth,et al.  Cognitive and neurobiological alterations in electromagnetic hypersensitive patients: results of a case-control study , 2008, Psychological Medicine.

[18]  K. Straif,et al.  Carcinogenicity of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. , 2011, The Lancet. Oncology.

[19]  C. Heumann,et al.  The impact of exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields on chronic well-being in young people--a cross-sectional study based on personal dosimetry. , 2011, Environment international.

[21]  Can exposure to a terrestrial trunked radio (TETRA)-like signal cause symptoms? A randomised double-blind provocation study , 2010, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[22]  K. Kroenke,et al.  Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Somatization and Symptom Syndromes: A Critical Review of Controlled Clinical Trials , 2000, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics.

[23]  Simon Wessely,et al.  Idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (formerly ‘electromagnetic hypersensitivity’): An updated systematic review of provocation studies , 2009, Bioelectromagnetics.

[24]  Diederick E. Grobbee,et al.  Clinical Epidemiology: Principles, Methods, and Applications for Clinical Research , 2008 .

[25]  Elisabeth Cardis,et al.  Radiofrequency exposure in the French general population: band, time, location and activity variability. , 2009, Environment international.

[26]  G. Rubin,et al.  Electromagnetic Fields, Symptoms and Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance , 2014 .

[27]  Elizabeth E Hatch,et al.  Self-reported electrical appliance use and risk of adult brain tumors. , 2005, American journal of epidemiology.

[28]  Elizabeth Broadbent,et al.  Explaining medically unexplained symptoms-models and mechanisms. , 2007, Clinical psychology review.

[29]  Georg Neubauer,et al.  Cohort study on the effects of everyday life radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure on non-specific symptoms and tinnitus. , 2012, Environment international.

[30]  Erik Lebret,et al.  Non-specific physical symptoms in relation to actual and perceived proximity to mobile phone base stations and powerlines , 2011, BMC public health.

[31]  S. Folkman,et al.  Stress, appraisal, and coping , 1974 .

[32]  G Berg-Beckhoff,et al.  Mobile phone base stations and adverse health effects: phase 2 of a cross-sectional study with measured radio frequency electromagnetic fields , 2008, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[33]  H-P Neitzke,et al.  Determination of exposure due to mobile phone base stations in an epidemiological study. , 2007, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[34]  H. Florig,et al.  Power-frequency magnetic fields from electric blankets , 1989, Images of the Twenty-First Century. Proceedings of the Annual International Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society,.

[35]  Timo Gnambs,et al.  Acute effects of electromagnetic fields emitted by GSM mobile phones on subjective well-being and physiological reactions: a meta-analysis. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[36]  M. Röösli.  Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure and non-specific symptoms of ill health: a systematic review. , 2008, Environmental research.

[37]  O. Van den Bergh,et al.  Media Warnings About Environmental Pollution Facilitate the Acquisition of Symptoms in Response to Chemical Substances , 2003, Psychosomatic medicine.

[38]  G James Rubin,et al.  Are media warnings about the adverse health effects of modern life self-fulfilling? An experimental study on idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (IEI-EMF). , 2013, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[39]  Qingsong Chen,et al.  A Meta-Analysis on the Relationship between Exposure to ELF-EMFs and the Risk of Female Breast Cancer , 2013, PloS one.

[40]  H. Hutter,et al.  Poor‐to‐moderate agreement between self and proxy interviews of mobile phone use , 2012, Bioelectromagnetics.

[41]  Design of an ecological momentary assessment study of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and non-specific physical symptoms , 2013, BMJ Open.

[42]  Erik Lebret,et al.  Non-specific physical symptoms and electromagnetic field exposure in the general population: can we get more specific? A systematic review. , 2012, Environment international.

[43]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[44]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[45]  G. Rubin,et al.  Psychological factors associated with self-reported sensitivity to mobile phones. , 2008, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[46]  Bernd Kowall,et al.  Determinants and stability over time of perception of health risks related to mobile phone base stations , 2012, International Journal of Public Health.

[47]  Susanna Lagorio,et al.  Recall bias in the assessment of exposure to mobile phones , 2008, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[48]  E. Lebret,et al.  Symptoms and related functioning in a traumatized community. , 2005, Archives of internal medicine.

[49]  T. Eikelboom,et al.  Personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field measurements in The Netherlands: exposure level and variability for everyday activities, times of day and types of area. , 2012, Environment international.

[50]  G. Bárdos,et al.  Somatosensory amplification as a possible source of subjective symptoms behind modern health worries. , 2011, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[51]  P. Boyle,et al.  Exposure to electromagnetic fields from use of electric blankets and other in-home electrical appliances and breast cancer risk. , 2000, American journal of epidemiology.

[52]  M. Röösli,et al.  Systematic review on the health effects of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from mobile phone base stations. , 2010, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[53]  S. Nordin,et al.  Coping strategies, social support and responsibility in chemical intolerance. , 2010, Journal of clinical nursing.

[54]  Harry Harmens,et al.  Working group report , 2011 .

[55]  Marina Heiden,et al.  Symptoms, personality traits, and stress in people with mobile phone-related symptoms and electromagnetic hypersensitivity. , 2010, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[56]  K. Yan,et al.  Magnetic fields exposure and childhood leukemia risk: a meta-analysis based on 11,699 cases and 13,194 controls. , 2014, Leukemia research.

[57]  B. Bentsen.  International classification of primary care. , 1986, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[58]  Michael A Kelsh,et al.  An evaluation of self‐reported mobile phone use compared to billing records among a group of engineers and scientists , 2011, Bioelectromagnetics.

[59]  W. Katon,et al.  Understanding and Caring for the Distressed Patient With Multiple Medically Unexplained Symptoms , 1998, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[60]  L. Hillert,et al.  Do people with idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields display physiological effects when exposed to electromagnetic fields? A systematic review of provocation studies , 2011, Bioelectromagnetics.

[61]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Impact of input data uncertainty on environmental exposure assessment models: A case study for electromagnetic field modelling from mobile phone base stations. , 2014, Environmental research.

[62]  N Leitgeb,et al.  Magnetic emissions of electric appliances. , 2008, International journal of hygiene and environmental health.

[63]  W. Hofman,et al.  Sleep and Mood: Measuring the Sleep Quality , 1979 .

[64]  Martin Röösli,et al.  Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields and Sleep Quality: A Prospective Cohort Study , 2012, PloS one.

[65]  M Hagström,et al.  Electromagnetic hypersensitive Finns: Symptoms, perceived sources and treatments, a questionnaire study. , 2013, Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology.

[66]  Effects of Everyday Radiofrequency Electromagnetic-Field Exposure on Sleep Quality: A Cross-Sectional Study , 2010, Radiation research.

[67]  S. Folkman,et al.  Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York, NY: Springer; , 1984 .

[68]  R. Vermeulen,et al.  Modelling indoor electromagnetic fields (EMF) from mobile phone base stations for epidemiological studies. , 2014, Environment international.

[69]  N. Leitgeb.  Macht Mobilfunk Kinder krank? , 2012, Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde.

[70]  A. Hayes.  Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[71]  E Cardis,et al.  Variability of radiofrequency exposure across days of the week: a population-based study. , 2011, Environmental research.

[72]  Georg Neubauer,et al.  A prediction model for personal radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[73]  Erik Lebret,et al.  Idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (IEI-EMF): A systematic review of identifying criteria , 2012, BMC Public Health.

[74]  E. Lebret,et al.  Comparing non-specific physical symptoms in environmentally sensitive patients: prevalence, duration, functional status and illness behavior. , 2014, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[75]  Georg Neubauer,et al.  Classification of personal exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) for epidemiological research: Evaluation of different exposure assessment methods. , 2010, Environment international.