Uncertainty in long-term timber production analyses usually focus success of regeneration, growth/mortality of trees and future fluctuations of timber prices/harvest costs, while uncertainty related to inventory data is paid less attention. At the same time, evaluations of inventory methods usually stop when the error level is stated, while the uncertainty accompanied by using the data is seldom considered. The present work addresses uncertain inventory data in long-term timber production analyses. Final harvest decisions, i.e. possible outcome intervals with respect to timing and expected net present value-losses due to incorrect timing, were considered. A case study was presented where inventory data errors according to different error levels were generated randomly. The selected error levels were based on observations from practical forest inventories in Norway. The analysis tool was GAYA-JLP. The impact of errors on decisions was derived through repeated computations of management strategies maximising net present value without harvest path constraints. A real rate of discount of 3 % and an error level of 15 % resulted in expected net present value-losses of 1 NOK ha–1 for basal area, 63 NOK ha–1 for mean height, 210 NOK ha–1 for site quality, 240 NOK ha–1 for stand age, and 499 NOK ha–1 when random errors occurred simultaneously for all these variables. The expected net present valuelosses varied considerably. The largest losses appeared for stands with ages around optimal economical rotation ages. The losses were also relatively large for young stands, while they were relatively low for overmature stands. The experiences from the case study along with considerations related to other sources of uncertainty may help us to get a more realistic attitude to the reliability of long-term timber production analyses. The results of the study may also serve as a starting point in a decision oriented inventory planning concept, in which alternatives for inventory design and intensity are based on considerations with respect to inventory costs as well as net present value-losses.
[1]
J. B. Pickens,et al.
Use of stochastic production coefficients in linear programming models: objective function distribution, feasibility, and dual activities
,
1988
.
[2]
Jyrki Kangas,et al.
Modelling and simulation of timber prices for forest planning calculations
,
1998
.
[3]
Annika Kangas,et al.
Optimization bias in forest management planning solutions due to errors in forest variables
,
1999
.
[4]
A. Weintraub,et al.
Analysis of uncertainty of futue timber yields in forest management
,
1995
.
[5]
Kari Pasanen,et al.
Integrating variation in tree growth into forest planning
,
1998
.
[6]
Göran Ståhl.
Optimal stand level forest inventory intensities under deterministic and stochastic stumpage value assumptions
,
1994
.
[7]
D A Hamilton,et al.
Specifying precision in natural resource inventories [Includes forests].
,
1978
.
[8]
Jyrki Kangas,et al.
A Method for Integrating Risk and Attitude Toward Risk into Forest Planning
,
1996,
Forest Science.
[9]
Annika Kangas,et al.
On the bias and variance in tree volume predictions due to model and measurement errors
,
1996
.
[10]
E. Næsset,et al.
Determination of stand volume in practical forest inventories based on field measurements and photo‐interpretation: The Norwegian experience
,
1998
.
[11]
William G. Cochran,et al.
Sampling Techniques, 3rd Edition
,
1963
.
[12]
L. Bondesson,et al.
A method to determine optimal stand data acquisition policies
,
1994
.
[13]
H. Braastad.
Tilvekstmodellprogram for bjørk
,
1977
.
[14]
Juha Lappi,et al.
JLP: A linear programming package for management planning.
,
1992
.