Effects of magnetic stray fields from a 7 Tesla MRI scanner on neurocognition: a double-blind randomised crossover study

Objective This study characterises neurocognitive domains that are affected by movement-induced time-varying magnetic fields (TVMF) within a static magnetic stray field (SMF) of a 7 Tesla (T) MRI scanner. Methods Using a double-blind randomised crossover design, 31 healthy volunteers were tested in a sham (0 T), low (0.5 T) and high (1.0 T) SMF exposure condition. Standardised head movements were made before every neurocognitive task to induce TVMF. Results Of the six tested neurocognitive domains, we demonstrated that attention and concentration were negatively affected when exposed to TVMF within an SMF (varying from 5.0% to 21.1% per Tesla exposure, p<0.05), particular in situations were high working memory performance was required. In addition, visuospatial orientation was affected after exposure (46.7% per Tesla exposure, p=0.05). Conclusion Neurocognitive functioning is modulated when exposed to movement-induced TVMF within an SMF of a 7 T MRI scanner. Domains that were affected include attention/concentration and visuospatial orientation. Further studies are needed to better understand the mechanisms and possible practical safety and health implications of these acute neurocognitive effects.

[1]  D. Hill,et al.  Cardiac catheterisation guided by MRI in children and adults with congenital heart disease , 2003, The Lancet.

[2]  Stuart Crozier,et al.  Analysis and Measurements of Magnetic Field Exposures for Healthcare Workers in SelectedMR Environments , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Astrid M L Kappers,et al.  Haptic Perception of Spatial Relations , 1999, Perception.

[4]  Xiaoping Hu,et al.  Advances in high-field magnetic resonance imaging. , 2004, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[5]  J. Ware,et al.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data. , 1982, Biometrics.

[6]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Exposure, health complaints and cognitive performance among employees of an MRI scanners manufacturing department , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  James C. Smith,et al.  Behavioral Effects of High-Strength Static Magnetic Fields on Rats , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Grover C Gilmore.  Scoring of contrast sensitivity on Vistech charts , 2002, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[9]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Neurobehavioral effects among subjects exposed to high static and gradient magnetic fields from a 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging system—A case‐crossover pilot study , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  A. Benton.  Contributions to Neuropsychological Assessment: A Clinical Manual , 1983 .

[11]  W. Hall,et al.  Brain tumor resection: intraoperative monitoring with high-field-strength MR imaging-initial results. , 2000, Radiology.

[12]  A. Kangarlu,et al.  Randomized comparison of cognitive function in humans at 0 and 8 Tesla , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  P. Gowland,et al.  Present and future magnetic resonance sources of exposure to static fields. , 2005, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[14]  J. Smallwood,et al.  The restless mind. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  Alayar Kangarlu,et al.  Effect of static magnetic field exposure of up to 8 Tesla on sequential human vital sign measurements , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  C L Dumoulin,et al.  Human exposure to 4.0-Tesla magnetic fields in a whole-body scanner. , 1992, Medical physics.

[17]  Geert Molenberghs,et al.  Random Effects Models for Longitudinal Data , 2010 .

[18]  Z. Bar-lev.  SPATIAL RELATIONS , 1977 .

[19]  N. Brooks.  Closed head injury : psychological, social, and family consequences , 1984 .

[20]  J. Schenck,et al.  Health and Physiological Effects of Human Exposure to Whole‐Body Four‐Tesla Magnetic Fields during MRI , 1992, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[21]  W. Edelstein,et al.  Spin warp NMR imaging and applications to human whole-body imaging. , 1980, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  Frank de Vocht,et al.  Health complaints among nurses working near MRI scanners--a descriptive pilot study. , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[23]  Jonathan S. A. Carriere,et al.  Anatomy of an error: A bidirectional state model of task engagement/disengagement and attention-related errors , 2009, Cognition.

[24]  R. Bowtell,et al.  Magnetic‐field‐induced vertigo: A theoretical and experimental investigation , 2007, Bioelectromagnetics.

[25]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Acute neurobehavioral effects of exposure to static magnetic fields: Analyses of exposure–response relations , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[26]  J. Greene.  Contributions to Neuropsychological Assessment , 1995 .

[27]  Oliver Kraff,et al.  Subjective acceptance of 7 Tesla MRI for human imaging , 2008, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[28]  P. Glover,et al.  Exposure to alternating electromagnetic fields and effects on the visual and visuomotor systems. , 2007, The British journal of radiology.

[29]  J. Bradshaw,et al.  Bisecting rods and lines: Effects of horizontal and vertical posture on left-side underestimation by normal subjects , 1985, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  H Kromhout,et al.  Cognitive effects of head‐movements in stray fields generated by a 7 Tesla whole‐body MRI magnet , 2007, Bioelectromagnetics.

[31]  C. Oman.  A heuristic mathematical model for the dynamics of sensory conflict and motion sickness. , 1982, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[32]  W. Hall,et al.  Minimally invasive procedures. Interventional MR image-guided neurobiopsy. , 2001, Neuroimaging clinics of North America.

[33]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Neurobehavioral recovery from head injury. , 1987 .

[34]  W. Hall,et al.  MR-Guided and MR-Monitored Neurosurgical Procedures at 1.5 T , 2000, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[35]  J. Schenck.  Safety of Strong, Static Magnetic Fields , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[36]  Gail Kuslansky,et al.  Hand preference and performance effects on line bisection , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  Maythem Saeed,et al.  Endovascular interventional MRI , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.