Development of an Electrical Stimulation Device for Osseointegrated Amputees - A Novel Approach for Expediting Skeletal Attachment and Rehabilitation

The projected number of American amputees is expected to rise to 3.6 million by 2050. Many of these individuals depend on artificial limbs to perform routine activities, but prosthetic suspensions using traditional socket technology can prove to be cumbersome and uncomfortable for a person with limb loss. Moreover, for those with high proximal amputations, limited residual limb length may prevent exoprosthesis attachment all together. Osseointegration technology is a novel operative procedure that allows integration between host tissue and an orthopaedic implant and has been shown to improve clinical outcomes by allowing direct transfer of loads to a bone-implant interface. However, the associated surgical procedures require long rehabilitation programs that may be reduced through expedited skeletal attachment via electrical stimulation. To determine optimal electrode size and placement, we have developed a system for computational modeling of the electric fields that arise during electrical stimulation of residual limbs. Three patients with retrospective CT scans were selected and three dimensional reconstructions were created using customized software (Seg3D and SCIRun). These software packages supported the development of patient specific models and allowed for interactive manipulation of electrode position and size; all variables that could affect the electric fields around a percutaneous osseointegrated implant. Preliminary results of the electric fields at the implant interface support the need for patient specific modeling in order to achieve the homogenous electric field distribution required to induce osteoblast migration and enhance skeletal fixation.

[1]  B. Rydevik,et al.  Osseointegration in skeletal reconstruction and rehabilitation: a review. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[2]  R. W. Lau,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: III. Parametric models for the dielectric spectrum of tissues. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Z. Zhen-gang,et al.  Measurement of Electrical Conductivity of Porous Titanium and Ti6Al4V Prepared by the Powder Metallurgy Method , 2007 .

[4]  K. Bachus,et al.  Comparative study of human cancellous bone remodeling to titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated implants. , 1993, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  G. Holt,et al.  Osseointegrated Titanium Implants , 1986 .

[6]  J. Aubin,et al.  Osteoclasts and osteoblasts migrate in opposite directions in response to a constant electrical field , 1986, Journal of cellular physiology.

[7]  J. Spadaro,et al.  Mechanical and electrical interactions in bone remodeling. , 1997, Bioelectromagnetics.

[8]  P. D. Wilson,et al.  Metallic wear in failed titanium-alloy total hip replacements. A histological and quantitative analysis. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  Sverre Grimnes,et al.  Bioimpedance and Bioelectricity Basics , 2000 .

[10]  Gerard J. Tortora,et al.  Principles of Human Anatomy , 1977 .

[11]  A. Sato,et al.  Appearance of osteoclasts and osteoblasts in electrically stimulated bones cultured on chorioallantoic membranes. , 1985, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  Maria A. Stuchly,et al.  Electric fields in bone marrow substructures at power-line frequencies , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  A. Grodzinsky,et al.  Electrical stimulation of repair of bone. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  C A Bassett,et al.  Bone biology. , 1987, Science.

[15]  O E BEDER,et al.  An investigation of tissue tolerance to titanium metal implants in dogs. , 1956, Surgery.

[16]  M. W. Johnson,et al.  Electrical properties of compact bone. , 1981, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  C. Brighton,et al.  The treatment of non-unions with electricity. , 1981, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  D. Williams,et al.  Biocompatibility of orthopedic implants , 1982 .

[19]  K. Hagberg,et al.  Consequences of non-vascular trans-femoral amputation: A survey of quality of life, prosthetic use and problems , 2001, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[20]  K. Bachus,et al.  Mineral apposition rates of human cancellous bone at the interface of porous coated implants. , 1994, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[21]  P. Branemark Osseointegration and its experimental background. , 1983, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[22]  T Albrektsson,et al.  Osseointegration of bone implants. A review of an alternative mode of fixation. , 1987, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[23]  C. Brighton,et al.  The response of non-traumatized bone to direct current. , 1974, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[24]  R.S. MacLeod,et al.  Evaluation of different meshing algorithms in the computation of defibrillation thresholds in children , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[25]  K. Bachus,et al.  Progression of human bone ingrowth into porous-coated implants. Rate of bone ingrowth in humans. , 1997, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.