Eye-tracking measures reveal how changes in the design of aided AAC displays influence the efficiency of locating symbols by school-age children without disabilities.

PURPOSE Many individuals with communication impairments use aided augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems involving letters, words, or line drawings that rely on the visual modality. It seems reasonable to suggest that display design should incorporate information about how users attend to and process visual information. The organization of AAC symbols can influence the speed and accuracy with which children select a target symbol on a display. This research examined why some displays facilitate responding. METHOD Eye-tracking technology recorded point-of-gaze while children without disabilities engaged in a visual search task with 2 AAC displays. In 1 display, symbols sharing an internal color were clustered together. In the other display, like-colored symbols were distributed. Dependent measures were (a) latency to fixate on the target compared with distracters and (b) the number of fixations to target and distracters. RESULTS Participants were significantly slower to fixate on the target when like-colored symbols were distributed; there was a significant increase in the number of fixations to distracters that did not share color with the target. CONCLUSIONS Efficient search was related to minimizing fixations to nonrelevant distracters. Vulnerability to distraction can be a significant problem in individuals with disabilities who use AAC. Minimizing the intrusion of such distraction may, therefore, be of importance in AAC display design.

[1]  G. Woodman,et al.  The comparison of visual working memory representations with perceptual inputs. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  V. Kuhlmeier,et al.  Young children show a dissociation in looking and pointing behavior in falling events , 2013 .

[3]  Michelle R. Greene,et al.  High-level aftereffects to global scene properties. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  J. Reznick,et al.  Development of visuospatial short-term memory in the second half of the 1st year. , 2004, Developmental psychology.

[5]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Speakers gaze at objects while preparing intentionally inaccurate labels for them. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  Brooke Hallowell,et al.  Visual attention in a multiple‐choice task: Influences of image characteristics with and without presentation of a verbal stimulus , 2009 .

[7]  D. Beukelman,et al.  Augmentative & Alternative Communication: Supporting Children & Adults With Complex Communication Needs , 2006 .

[8]  B. Hallowell,et al.  Validity of eye movement methods and indices for capturing semantic (associative) priming effects. , 2009, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[9]  S. Lanfranchi,et al.  Executive function in adolescents with Down Syndrome. , 2010, Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR.

[10]  Evan M. Palmer,et al.  Reaction time distributions constrain models of visual search , 2010, Vision Research.

[11]  Reiko Mazuka,et al.  Intonation facilitates contrast resolution: Evidence from Japanese adults and 6-year olds , 2012 .

[12]  R. Engels,et al.  Parental smoking and children’s attention to smoking cues , 2012, Journal of psychopharmacology.

[13]  R. Remington,et al.  The representation of color and form in long-term memory , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[14]  G W Humphreys,et al.  The Effects of Surface Detail on Object Categorization and Naming , 1989, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[15]  C. Cornoldi,et al.  A specific deficit in visuospatial simultaneous working memory in Down syndrome. , 2009, Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR.

[16]  Vinoth Jagaroo,et al.  Contributions of Principles of Visual Cognitive Science to AAC System Display Design , 2004 .

[17]  D. Jeffery Higginbotham,et al.  Use of nondisabled subjects in AAC research: Confessions of a research infidel , 1995 .

[18]  K. Wilkinson,et al.  Perceptual factors influence visual search for meaningful symbols in individuals with intellectual disabilities and Down syndrome or autism spectrum disorders. , 2013, American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities.

[19]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[20]  G. Legge,et al.  Color improves object recognition in normal and low vision , 1993 .

[21]  G. Dichter,et al.  Brief Report: Circumscribed Attention in Young Children with Autism , 2011, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[22]  Christina P Strawbridge,et al.  Guided visual search in individuals with mental retardation. , 2002, American journal of mental retardation : AJMR.

[23]  Thomas Sanocki,et al.  Time Course of Perceptual Grouping by Color , 2003 .

[24]  Janice Light,et al.  The Semantic Organization Patterns of Young Children: Implications for Augmentative and Alternative Communication , 2003 .

[25]  T. White,et al.  Divided attention in youth-onset psychosis and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. , 2008, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[26]  M. Costantini,et al.  Tie my hands, tie my eyes. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[28]  Kelly E. Neriani,et al.  Combining information in different color-coding mechanisms to facilitate visual search , 2004, Vision Research.

[29]  Stephen N. Calculator,et al.  Roles and responsibilities of speech-language pathologists with respect to augmentative and alternative communication: Position Statement , 2005 .

[30]  Jennifer J. Thistle,et al.  The role of color cues in facilitating accurate and rapid location of aided symbols by children with and without down syndrome. , 2008, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[31]  A. Treisman.  Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[32]  R. Johnson,et al.  The picture communication symbols , 1993 .

[33]  Thomas Sanocki,et al.  Time course of perceptual grouping by color. , 2003, Psychological science.

[34]  M. Hebl,et al.  Discrimination against facially stigmatized applicants in interviews: an eye-tracking and face-to-face investigation. , 2012, The Journal of applied psychology.

[35]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  Jeremy M. Wolfe.  Establishing the Field , 2012 .

[37]  Vinoth Jagaroo,et al.  Preschoolers' speed of locating a target symbol under different color conditions , 2006, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[38]  S. Heuer,et al.  An evaluation of multiple‐choice test images for comprehension assessment in aphasia , 2007 .

[39]  J. Wilding,et al.  A neuropsychological profile of attention deficits in young males with fragile X syndrome , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[40]  D. Kendall,et al.  Scope of Practice in Speech-Language Pathology , 2002 .

[41]  Ashleigh M. Richard,et al.  Understanding the function of visual short-term memory: transsaccadic memory, object correspondence, and gaze correction. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[42]  D. Smilek,et al.  Revisiting the category effect: The influence of meaning and search strategy on the efficiency of visual search , 2006, Brain Research.

[43]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Event boundaries in perception affect memory encoding and updating. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[44]  J. Burack,et al.  Selective attention deficits in persons with autism: preliminary evidence of an inefficient attentional lens. , 1994, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[45]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  SEARCH FOR A CONJUNCTIVELY DEFINED TARGET CAN BE SELECTIVELY LIMITED TO A COLOR-DEFINED SUBSET OF ELEMENTS , 1995 .