Learning as acquiring a discursive identity through participation in a community: improving student learning in engineering education

In this paper, we propose that learning in engineering involves taking on the discourse of an engineering community, which is intimately bound up with the identity of being a member of that community. This leads to the notion of discursive identity, which emphasises that students’ identities are constituted through engaging in discourse. This view of learning implies that success in engineering studies needs to be defined with particular reference to the sorts of identities that students develop and how these relate to identities in the world of work. In order to achieve successful learning in engineering, we need to recognise the multiple identities held by our students, provide an authentic range of engineering-related activities through which students can develop engineering identities and make more explicit key aspects of the discourse of engineering of which lecturers are tacitly aware. We include three vignettes to illustrate how some of the authors of this paper (from across three different institutions) have applied this perspective of learning in their teaching practice.

[1]  Mary Lea,et al.  The "Academic Literacies" Model: Theory and Applications , 2006 .

[2]  M. Ohland,et al.  The Impact of a Discipline‐Based Introduction to Engineering Course on Improving Retention , 1998 .

[3]  Jeff Jawitz,et al.  Exploring the Reasons South African Students Give for Studying Engineering , 1998 .

[4]  Cecilia Jacobs,et al.  Towards a critical understanding of the teaching of discipline-specific academic literacies: making the tacit explicit , 2007 .

[5]  Cristina H. Amon,et al.  Systematic Design of a First‐Year Mechanical Engineering Course at Carnegie Mellon University , 1997 .

[6]  Alison Lee,et al.  Engineering as Captive Discourse , 1996 .

[7]  A. Sfard.  On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One , 1998 .

[8]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[9]  Alison Phipps,et al.  Engineering women: the `gendering' of professional identities , 2002 .

[11]  Melanie Walker,et al.  Engineering Identities , 2001 .

[12]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Everyday Problem Solving in Engineering: Lessons for Engineering Educators , 2006 .

[13]  Håkan Hult,et al.  From senior student to novice worker: learning trajectories in political science, psychology and mechanical engineering , 2006 .

[14]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[15]  E. Yalow.  On Educational psychology: A cognitive view. , 1979 .

[16]  L. Wood,et al.  From the Authors , 2003, European Respiratory Journal.

[17]  John M. Reveles,et al.  Scientific literacy and discursive identity: A theoretical framework for understanding science learning , 2005 .

[18]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  How Does Identity Shape the Experiences of Women of Color Engineering Students? , 2005 .

[19]  J. Gee.  Identity as an analytic lens for research in education , 2000 .

[20]  J. Lemke.  Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education , 2001 .