Functionalized nanoparticle interactions with polymeric membranes.

A series of experiments was performed to measure the retention of a class of functionalized nanoparticles (NPs) on porous (microfiltration and ultrafiltration) membranes. The findings impact engineered water and wastewater treatment using membrane technology, characterization and analytical schemes for NP detection, and the use of NPs in waste treatment scenarios. The NPs studied were composed of silver, titanium dioxide, and gold; had organic coatings to yield either positive or negative surface charge; and were between 2 and 10nm in diameter. NP solutions were applied to polymeric membranes composed of different materials and pore sizes (ranging from ≈ 2 nm [3 kDa molecular weight cutoff] to 0.2 μm). Greater than 99% rejection was observed of positively charged NPs by negatively charged membranes even though pore diameters were up to 20 times the NP diameter; thus, sorption caused rejection. Negatively charged NPs were less well rejected, but behavior was dependent not only on surface functionality but on NP core material (Ag, TiO(2), or Au). NP rejection depended more upon NP properties than membrane properties; all of the negatively charged polymeric membranes behaved similarly. The NP-membrane interaction behavior fell into four categories, which are defined and described here.

[1]  M A Kiser,et al.  Titanium nanomaterial removal and release from wastewater treatment plants. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  S. Chae,et al.  Membrane filtration of fullerene nanoparticle suspensions: effects of derivatization, pressure, electrolyte species and concentration. , 2010, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[3]  C. Tyler,et al.  Review: Do engineered nanoparticles pose a significant threat to the aquatic environment? , 2010, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[4]  Paul Westerhoff,et al.  Nanoparticle silver released into water from commercially available sock fabrics. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Tae-Hyun Bae,et al.  Effect of TiO2 nanoparticles on fouling mitigation of ultrafiltration membranes for activated sludge filtration , 2005 .

[6]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Pharmaceutical retention mechanisms by nanofiltration membranes. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  Ming-kuang Wang,et al.  Automated Ultrafiltration Device for Efficient Collection of Environmental Nanoparticles from Aqueous Suspensions , 2009 .

[8]  Lianfa Song,et al.  Mechanisms and Parameters Affecting Flux Decline in Cross-Flow Microfiltration and Ultrafiltration of Colloids , 2000 .

[9]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  Probabilistic material flow modeling for assessing the environmental exposure to compounds: Methodology and an application to engineered nano-TiO2 particles , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[10]  A. Fane,et al.  Ultrafiltration of Colloidal Silver Particles: Flux, Rejection, and Fouling , 1993 .

[11]  B. Nowack,et al.  Exposure modeling of engineered nanoparticles in the environment. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  S. Chae,et al.  Comparison of Methods for Fullerene Detection and Measurements of Reactive Oxygen Production in Cosmetic Products , 2010 .

[13]  S. Wickramasinghe,et al.  Tangential flow filtration for virus purification , 2008 .

[14]  Paul Westerhoff,et al.  Nanoparticle silver released into water from commercially available sock fabrics (Environmental Science and Technology (2008) 42, (4133-4139)) , 2008 .

[15]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Colloidal adhesion to hydrophilic membrane surfaces , 2004 .

[16]  Enrique Navarro,et al.  Toxicity of silver nanoparticles to Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Mary Elizabeth Williams,et al.  Diffusive flux and magnetic manipulation of nanoparticles through porous membranes. , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[18]  Daniel W. Elliott,et al.  Zero-Valent Iron Nanoparticles for Abatement of Environmental Pollutants: Materials and Engineering Aspects , 2006 .

[19]  J. Dewez,et al.  Chemical reactivity assay and surface characterization of a poly(vinylidene fluoride) microfiltration membrane (“Durapore DVPP”) , 2005 .

[20]  P. Rack,et al.  An optimized nanoparticle separator enabled by electron beam induced deposition , 2010, Nanotechnology.

[21]  Michael F Hochella,et al.  Aquatic environmental nanoparticles. , 2007, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[22]  N. Toshima,et al.  Simple and Environmentally Compatible One-pot Synthesis of Au Nanoparticles from Bulk: Separation of Au, Ag, and Cu in Water , 2009 .

[23]  Kiril Hristovski,et al.  The release of nanosilver from consumer products used in the home. , 2010, Journal of environmental quality.

[24]  J. Hermia,et al.  Constant Pressure Blocking Filtration Laws - Application To Power-law Non-newtonian Fluids , 1982 .

[25]  Waite,et al.  Colloidal Fouling of Ultrafiltration Membranes: Impact of Aggregate Structure and Size. , 1999, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[26]  Bernd Nowack,et al.  Behavior of silver nanotextiles during washing , 2009 .

[27]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Membrane–Colloid Interactions: Comparison of Extended DLVO Predictions with AFM Force Measurements , 2002 .

[28]  A. Fane,et al.  Characterization of clean and fouled membranes using metal colloids , 1994 .

[29]  Qixing Zhou,et al.  The combination of rotating disk photocatalytic reactor and TiO2 nanotube arrays for environmental pollutants removal. , 2011, Journal of hazardous materials.

[30]  F. Wong,et al.  A new method for the prediction of pore size distribution and MWCO of ultrafiltration membranes , 2006 .

[31]  S. Bhattacharjee,et al.  Effect of Membrane Surface Roughness on Colloid−Membrane DLVO Interactions , 2003 .

[32]  C. Robic,et al.  Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, stabilization, vectorization, physicochemical characterizations, and biological applications. , 2008, Chemical reviews.

[33]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Influence of Crossflow Membrane Filter Geometry and Shear Rate on Colloidal Fouling in Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration Separations , 2002 .

[34]  R. Scholz,et al.  Modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials (TiO(2), ZnO, Ag, CNT, Fullerenes) for different regions. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[35]  E. Hoek,et al.  Removing cadmium ions from water via nanoparticle-enhanced ultrafiltration. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[36]  Steffen Foss Hansen,et al.  Categorization framework to aid exposure assessment of nanomaterials in consumer products , 2008, Ecotoxicology.

[37]  Enda Cummins,et al.  Nano-Scale Pollutants: Fate in Irish Surface and Drinking Water Regulatory Systems , 2010 .

[38]  Andrea I. Schäfer,et al.  Microfiltration of colloids and natural organic matter , 2000 .

[39]  K. Kimura,et al.  REJECTION OF ORGANIC MICROPOLLUTANTS (DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCTS, ENDOCRINE DISRUPTING COMPOUNDS, AND PHARMACEUTICALLY ACTIVE COMPOUNDS) BY NF/RO MEMBRANES , 2003 .

[40]  William P. Ball,et al.  Assessing the colloidal properties of engineered nanoparticles in water: case studies from fullerene C60 nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes , 2010 .

[41]  Yuhong Xu,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of iron oxide/polymer composite nanoparticles with pendent functional groups. , 2006, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[42]  T. Matsuura,et al.  Membrane Fouling Test: Apparatus Evaluation , 2004 .

[43]  Chris D Vulpe,et al.  Differential gene expression in Daphnia magna suggests distinct modes of action and bioavailability for ZnO nanoparticles and Zn ions. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.