The developmental potential of iPSCs is greatly influenced by reprogramming factor selection.

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are commonly generated by transduction of Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and Myc (OSKM) into cells. Although iPSCs are pluripotent, they frequently exhibit high variation in terms of quality, as measured in mice by chimera contribution and tetraploid complementation. Reliably high-quality iPSCs will be needed for future therapeutic applications. Here, we show that one major determinant of iPSC quality is the combination of reprogramming factors used. Based on tetraploid complementation, we found that ectopic expression of Sall4, Nanog, Esrrb, and Lin28 (SNEL) in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) generated high-quality iPSCs more efficiently than other combinations of factors including OSKM. Although differentially methylated regions, transcript number of master regulators, establishment of specific superenhancers, and global aneuploidy were comparable between high- and low-quality lines, aberrant gene expression, trisomy of chromosome 8, and abnormal H2A.X deposition were distinguishing features that could potentially also be applicable to human.

[1]  Andrew D. Smith,et al.  Bioinformatics Applications Note Gene Expression Identifying Dispersed Epigenomic Domains from Chip-seq Data , 2022 .

[2]  Martin J. Aryee,et al.  Epigenetic memory in induced pluripotent stem cells , 2010, Nature.

[3]  J. Chen,et al.  Rational optimization of reprogramming culture conditions for the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells with ultra-high efficiency and fast kinetics , 2011, Cell Research.

[4]  R. Foreman,et al.  Requirement for Foxd3 in maintaining pluripotent cells of the early mouse embryo. , 2002, Genes & development.

[5]  Hui Yang,et al.  Zscan4 promotes genomic stability during reprogramming and dramatically improves the quality of iPS cells as demonstrated by tetraploid complementation , 2012, Cell Research.

[6]  C. Disteche,et al.  Trisomy eight in ES cells is a common potential problem in gene targeting and interferes with germ line transmission , 1997, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[7]  Charles Y. Lin,et al.  Transcriptional Amplification in Tumor Cells with Elevated c-Myc , 2012, Cell.

[8]  R. Young,et al.  Super-Enhancers in the Control of Cell Identity and Disease , 2013, Cell.

[9]  J. Rinn,et al.  Lin28a transgenic mice manifest size and puberty phenotypes identified in human genetic association studies , 2010, Nature Genetics.

[10]  Kristopher L. Nazor,et al.  Adult mice generated from induced pluripotent stem cells , 2009, Nature.

[11]  P. Park,et al.  Ascorbic acid prevents loss of Dlk1-Dio3 imprinting and facilitates generation of all-iPS cell mice from terminally differentiated B cells , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[12]  G. Wahl,et al.  c-Myc can induce DNA damage, increase reactive oxygen species, and mitigate p53 function: a mechanism for oncogene-induced genetic instability. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[13]  Julie V. Harness,et al.  Dynamic changes in the copy number of pluripotency and cell proliferation genes in human ESCs and iPSCs during reprogramming and time in culture. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[14]  Ryan Brinkman,et al.  BAIT: Organizing genomes and mapping rearrangements in single cells , 2013, Genome Medicine.

[15]  Tsviya Olender,et al.  GeneDecks: paralog hunting and gene-set distillation with GeneCards annotation. , 2009, Omics : a journal of integrative biology.

[16]  L. Staudt,et al.  Identification of Early Replicating Fragile Sites that Contribute to Genome Instability , 2013, Cell.

[17]  P. Labosky,et al.  Regulation of Embryonic Stem Cell Self‐Renewal and Pluripotency by Foxd3 , 2008, Stem cells.

[18]  Shahin Rafii,et al.  Histone variant H2A.X deposition pattern serves as a functional epigenetic mark for distinguishing the developmental potentials of iPSCs. , 2014, Cell stem cell.

[19]  T. Enver,et al.  Forcing cells to change lineages , 2009, Nature.

[20]  Yves Pommier,et al.  γH2AX and cancer , 2008, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[21]  R. Stewart,et al.  Hotspots of aberrant epigenomic reprogramming in human induced pluripotent stem cells , 2011, Nature.

[22]  Andrew P. Feinberg,et al.  Donor cell type can influence the epigenome and differentiation potential of human induced pluripotent stem cells , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[23]  Yixue Li,et al.  Different developmental potential of pluripotent stem cells generated by different reprogramming strategies. , 2011, Journal of molecular cell biology.

[24]  D. Pei,et al.  Vitamin C improves the quality of somatic cell reprogramming , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[25]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  ES cells derived from cloned and fertilized blastocysts are transcriptionally and functionally indistinguishable. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Yoosik Kim,et al.  LIN28A Is a Suppressor of ER-Associated Translation in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2012, Cell.

[27]  Riitta Lahesmaa,et al.  Copy number variation and selection during reprogramming to pluripotency , 2011, Nature.

[28]  N. Benvenisty,et al.  Epigenetic memory and preferential lineage-specific differentiation in induced pluripotent stem cells derived from human pancreatic islet beta cells. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[29]  Alexander van Oudenaarden,et al.  Variability in gene expression underlies incomplete penetrance , 2009, Nature.

[30]  Yoav Mayshar,et al.  Identification and classification of chromosomal aberrations in human induced pluripotent stem cells. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[31]  David A. Orlando,et al.  Master Transcription Factors and Mediator Establish Super-Enhancers at Key Cell Identity Genes , 2013, Cell.

[32]  Jun S. Song,et al.  Incomplete DNA methylation underlies a transcriptional memory of somatic cells in human iPS cells , 2011, Nature Cell Biology.

[33]  T. Ludwig,et al.  Homologous recombination DNA repair genes play a critical role in reprogramming to a pluripotent state. , 2013, Cell reports.

[34]  Rudolf Jaenisch,et al.  Efficient method to generate single‐copy transgenic mice by site‐specific integration in embryonic stem cells , 2006, Genesis.

[35]  Sandy L. Klemm,et al.  Transcriptional profiling of cells sorted by transcript abundance , 2014 .

[36]  Qi Zhou,et al.  iPS cells produce viable mice through tetraploid complementation , 2009, Nature.

[37]  Rudolf Jaenisch,et al.  Reprogramming factor stoichiometry influences the epigenetic state and biological properties of induced pluripotent stem cells. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[38]  M. Pera,et al.  Stem cells: The dark side of induced pluripotency , 2011, Nature.

[39]  Tomohiro Kono,et al.  Aberrant silencing of imprinted genes on chromosome 12qF1 in mouse induced pluripotent stem cells , 2010, Nature.

[40]  L. Cope,et al.  HMGA1 Reprograms Somatic Cells into Pluripotent Stem Cells by Inducing Stem Cell Transcriptional Networks , 2012, PloS one.

[41]  Yongjun Zhao,et al.  DNA template strand sequencing of single-cells maps genomic rearrangements at high resolution , 2012, Nature Methods.

[42]  Martin J Aryee,et al.  Differential methylation of tissue- and cancer-specific CpG island shores distinguishes human induced pluripotent stem cells, embryonic stem cells and fibroblasts , 2009, Nature Genetics.

[43]  Manuel Serrano,et al.  A p53-mediated DNA damage response limits reprogramming to ensure iPS cell genomic integrity , 2009, Nature.

[44]  D. Green,et al.  c-Myc Is a Universal Amplifier of Expressed Genes in Lymphocytes and Embryonic Stem Cells , 2012, Cell.

[45]  K. Hochedlinger,et al.  Cell type of origin influences the molecular and functional properties of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[46]  David A. Williams,et al.  Overcoming reprogramming resistance of Fanconi anemia cells. , 2012, Blood.

[47]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  At most three ES cells contribute to the somatic lineages of chimeric mice and of mice produced by ES-tetraploid complementation. , 2004, Developmental biology.

[48]  A. Nordheim,et al.  Srf−/− ES cells display non‐cell‐autonomous impairment in mesodermal differentiation , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[49]  G. Pan,et al.  Order from chaos: single cell reprogramming in two phases. , 2012, Cell stem cell.

[50]  C. Lengner,et al.  Sequential expression of pluripotency markers during direct reprogramming of mouse somatic cells. , 2008, Cell stem cell.

[51]  T. Léveillard,et al.  Development and application of a next-generation-sequencing (NGS) approach to detect known and novel gene defects underlying retinal diseases , 2012, Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases.

[52]  E. Kirkness,et al.  Somatic coding mutations in human induced pluripotent stem cells , 2011, Nature.

[53]  Sandy L. Klemm,et al.  Single-Cell Expression Analyses during Cellular Reprogramming Reveal an Early Stochastic and a Late Hierarchic Phase , 2012, Cell.

[54]  Cole Trapnell,et al.  Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome , 2009, Genome Biology.

[55]  Nicola Festuccia,et al.  Esrrb Is a Direct Nanog Target Gene that Can Substitute for Nanog Function in Pluripotent Cells , 2012, Cell stem cell.

[56]  Rudolf Jaenisch,et al.  Mechanisms and models of somatic cell reprogramming , 2013, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[57]  Dan Nettleton,et al.  Estimation of False Discovery Rate Using Sequential Permutation p‐Values , 2013, Biometrics.

[58]  Shaorong Gao,et al.  Cell Stem Cell Brief Report Ips Cells Can Support Full-term Development of Tetraploid Blastocyst-complemented Embryos Cell Stem Cell Brief Report , 2022 .

[59]  Jennifer M. Bolin,et al.  Proteomic and phosphoproteomic comparison of human ES and iPS cells , 2011, Nature Methods.

[60]  Ayellet V. Segrè,et al.  The Lin28/let-7 Axis Regulates Glucose Metabolism , 2011, Cell.

[61]  Mike J. Mason,et al.  Induced pluripotent stem cells and embryonic stem cells are distinguished by gene expression signatures. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[62]  G. Daley,et al.  A role for Lin28 in primordial germ cell development and germ cell malignancy , 2009, Nature.

[63]  Steven L Salzberg,et al.  Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2 , 2012, Nature Methods.