The developmental potential of iPSCs is greatly influenced by reprogramming factor selection.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Matthew D. Schultz | Richard A Young | Rudolf Jaenisch | Yupeng He | Joseph R Ecker | David Porubsky | Peter M Lansdorp | R. Young | R. Jaenisch | Y. Buganim | J. Ecker | Dina A. Faddah | S. Markoulaki | K. Ganz | S. Sarkar | Joseph R. Nery | D. Porubsky | P. Lansdorp | Johanna E. Goldmann | M. Schultz | A. Xiao | B. Abraham | Heather A. Hoke | Yupeng He | Linyu Shi | Malkiel A. Cohen | Batool Akhtar-Zaidi | Q. Gao | Styliani Markoulaki | Tao P. Wu | Tao Wu | Andrew Xiao | Brian J Abraham | Linyu Shi | Joseph R Nery | Niek van Wietmarschen | Qing Gao | Yosef Buganim | Sovan Sarkar | Niek van Wietmarschen | Dina A Faddah | Kibibi Ganz | Johanna Goldmann | Batool Akhtar-Zaidi | Heather Hoke | Elisabeth Kulenkampff | Malkiel Cohen | Matthew D Schultz | Elisabeth Kulenkampff | Q. Gao | David Porubsky | Sovan Sarkar | R. Young | David Porubsky
[1] Andrew D. Smith,et al. Bioinformatics Applications Note Gene Expression Identifying Dispersed Epigenomic Domains from Chip-seq Data , 2022 .
[2] Martin J. Aryee,et al. Epigenetic memory in induced pluripotent stem cells , 2010, Nature.
[3] J. Chen,et al. Rational optimization of reprogramming culture conditions for the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells with ultra-high efficiency and fast kinetics , 2011, Cell Research.
[4] R. Foreman,et al. Requirement for Foxd3 in maintaining pluripotent cells of the early mouse embryo. , 2002, Genes & development.
[5] Hui Yang,et al. Zscan4 promotes genomic stability during reprogramming and dramatically improves the quality of iPS cells as demonstrated by tetraploid complementation , 2012, Cell Research.
[6] C. Disteche,et al. Trisomy eight in ES cells is a common potential problem in gene targeting and interferes with germ line transmission , 1997, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.
[7] Charles Y. Lin,et al. Transcriptional Amplification in Tumor Cells with Elevated c-Myc , 2012, Cell.
[8] R. Young,et al. Super-Enhancers in the Control of Cell Identity and Disease , 2013, Cell.
[9] J. Rinn,et al. Lin28a transgenic mice manifest size and puberty phenotypes identified in human genetic association studies , 2010, Nature Genetics.
[10] Kristopher L. Nazor,et al. Adult mice generated from induced pluripotent stem cells , 2009, Nature.
[11] P. Park,et al. Ascorbic acid prevents loss of Dlk1-Dio3 imprinting and facilitates generation of all-iPS cell mice from terminally differentiated B cells , 2012, Nature Genetics.
[12] G. Wahl,et al. c-Myc can induce DNA damage, increase reactive oxygen species, and mitigate p53 function: a mechanism for oncogene-induced genetic instability. , 2002, Molecular cell.
[13] Julie V. Harness,et al. Dynamic changes in the copy number of pluripotency and cell proliferation genes in human ESCs and iPSCs during reprogramming and time in culture. , 2011, Cell stem cell.
[14] Ryan Brinkman,et al. BAIT: Organizing genomes and mapping rearrangements in single cells , 2013, Genome Medicine.
[15] Tsviya Olender,et al. GeneDecks: paralog hunting and gene-set distillation with GeneCards annotation. , 2009, Omics : a journal of integrative biology.
[16] L. Staudt,et al. Identification of Early Replicating Fragile Sites that Contribute to Genome Instability , 2013, Cell.
[17] P. Labosky,et al. Regulation of Embryonic Stem Cell Self‐Renewal and Pluripotency by Foxd3 , 2008, Stem cells.
[18] Shahin Rafii,et al. Histone variant H2A.X deposition pattern serves as a functional epigenetic mark for distinguishing the developmental potentials of iPSCs. , 2014, Cell stem cell.
[19] T. Enver,et al. Forcing cells to change lineages , 2009, Nature.
[20] Yves Pommier,et al. γH2AX and cancer , 2008, Nature Reviews Cancer.
[21] R. Stewart,et al. Hotspots of aberrant epigenomic reprogramming in human induced pluripotent stem cells , 2011, Nature.
[22] Andrew P. Feinberg,et al. Donor cell type can influence the epigenome and differentiation potential of human induced pluripotent stem cells , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.
[23] Yixue Li,et al. Different developmental potential of pluripotent stem cells generated by different reprogramming strategies. , 2011, Journal of molecular cell biology.
[24] D. Pei,et al. Vitamin C improves the quality of somatic cell reprogramming , 2012, Nature Genetics.
[25] R. Jaenisch,et al. ES cells derived from cloned and fertilized blastocysts are transcriptionally and functionally indistinguishable. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[26] Yoosik Kim,et al. LIN28A Is a Suppressor of ER-Associated Translation in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2012, Cell.
[27] Riitta Lahesmaa,et al. Copy number variation and selection during reprogramming to pluripotency , 2011, Nature.
[28] N. Benvenisty,et al. Epigenetic memory and preferential lineage-specific differentiation in induced pluripotent stem cells derived from human pancreatic islet beta cells. , 2011, Cell stem cell.
[29] Alexander van Oudenaarden,et al. Variability in gene expression underlies incomplete penetrance , 2009, Nature.
[30] Yoav Mayshar,et al. Identification and classification of chromosomal aberrations in human induced pluripotent stem cells. , 2010, Cell stem cell.
[31] David A. Orlando,et al. Master Transcription Factors and Mediator Establish Super-Enhancers at Key Cell Identity Genes , 2013, Cell.
[32] Jun S. Song,et al. Incomplete DNA methylation underlies a transcriptional memory of somatic cells in human iPS cells , 2011, Nature Cell Biology.
[33] T. Ludwig,et al. Homologous recombination DNA repair genes play a critical role in reprogramming to a pluripotent state. , 2013, Cell reports.
[34] Rudolf Jaenisch,et al. Efficient method to generate single‐copy transgenic mice by site‐specific integration in embryonic stem cells , 2006, Genesis.
[35] Sandy L. Klemm,et al. Transcriptional profiling of cells sorted by transcript abundance , 2014 .
[36] Qi Zhou,et al. iPS cells produce viable mice through tetraploid complementation , 2009, Nature.
[37] Rudolf Jaenisch,et al. Reprogramming factor stoichiometry influences the epigenetic state and biological properties of induced pluripotent stem cells. , 2011, Cell stem cell.
[38] M. Pera,et al. Stem cells: The dark side of induced pluripotency , 2011, Nature.
[39] Tomohiro Kono,et al. Aberrant silencing of imprinted genes on chromosome 12qF1 in mouse induced pluripotent stem cells , 2010, Nature.
[40] L. Cope,et al. HMGA1 Reprograms Somatic Cells into Pluripotent Stem Cells by Inducing Stem Cell Transcriptional Networks , 2012, PloS one.
[41] Yongjun Zhao,et al. DNA template strand sequencing of single-cells maps genomic rearrangements at high resolution , 2012, Nature Methods.
[42] Martin J Aryee,et al. Differential methylation of tissue- and cancer-specific CpG island shores distinguishes human induced pluripotent stem cells, embryonic stem cells and fibroblasts , 2009, Nature Genetics.
[43] Manuel Serrano,et al. A p53-mediated DNA damage response limits reprogramming to ensure iPS cell genomic integrity , 2009, Nature.
[44] D. Green,et al. c-Myc Is a Universal Amplifier of Expressed Genes in Lymphocytes and Embryonic Stem Cells , 2012, Cell.
[45] K. Hochedlinger,et al. Cell type of origin influences the molecular and functional properties of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.
[46] David A. Williams,et al. Overcoming reprogramming resistance of Fanconi anemia cells. , 2012, Blood.
[47] R. Jaenisch,et al. At most three ES cells contribute to the somatic lineages of chimeric mice and of mice produced by ES-tetraploid complementation. , 2004, Developmental biology.
[48] A. Nordheim,et al. Srf−/− ES cells display non‐cell‐autonomous impairment in mesodermal differentiation , 2000, The EMBO journal.
[49] G. Pan,et al. Order from chaos: single cell reprogramming in two phases. , 2012, Cell stem cell.
[50] C. Lengner,et al. Sequential expression of pluripotency markers during direct reprogramming of mouse somatic cells. , 2008, Cell stem cell.
[51] T. Léveillard,et al. Development and application of a next-generation-sequencing (NGS) approach to detect known and novel gene defects underlying retinal diseases , 2012, Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases.
[52] E. Kirkness,et al. Somatic coding mutations in human induced pluripotent stem cells , 2011, Nature.
[53] Sandy L. Klemm,et al. Single-Cell Expression Analyses during Cellular Reprogramming Reveal an Early Stochastic and a Late Hierarchic Phase , 2012, Cell.
[54] Cole Trapnell,et al. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome , 2009, Genome Biology.
[55] Nicola Festuccia,et al. Esrrb Is a Direct Nanog Target Gene that Can Substitute for Nanog Function in Pluripotent Cells , 2012, Cell stem cell.
[56] Rudolf Jaenisch,et al. Mechanisms and models of somatic cell reprogramming , 2013, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[57] Dan Nettleton,et al. Estimation of False Discovery Rate Using Sequential Permutation p‐Values , 2013, Biometrics.
[58] Shaorong Gao,et al. Cell Stem Cell Brief Report Ips Cells Can Support Full-term Development of Tetraploid Blastocyst-complemented Embryos Cell Stem Cell Brief Report , 2022 .
[59] Jennifer M. Bolin,et al. Proteomic and phosphoproteomic comparison of human ES and iPS cells , 2011, Nature Methods.
[60] Ayellet V. Segrè,et al. The Lin28/let-7 Axis Regulates Glucose Metabolism , 2011, Cell.
[61] Mike J. Mason,et al. Induced pluripotent stem cells and embryonic stem cells are distinguished by gene expression signatures. , 2009, Cell stem cell.
[62] G. Daley,et al. A role for Lin28 in primordial germ cell development and germ cell malignancy , 2009, Nature.
[63] Steven L Salzberg,et al. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2 , 2012, Nature Methods.