Location of a multinational corporation in a cluster:: A theoretical model of knowledge transfer

Purpose A multinational company (MNC) looking to locate within a cluster is mainly interested in gaining access to scarce and highly valuable tacit knowledge. The transfer of such resources first requires sharing a certain degree of architectural and specific knowledge. This paper aims to examine the transfer of systemic technological expertise (specific tacit knowledge) that is incorporated into organisational practices (architectural knowledge). To quantify the level of knowledge transfer involved, the present study defines the architectural distance between the MNC and the cluster. Design/methodology/approach The mathematical expression of acquisition performance is inferred from a conceptual study that formulates hypotheses regarding the impact of these variables on knowledge transfer. The MNC chooses its location in such a way as to maximise this performance. Findings Applying a mathematical model to knowledge transfer between two of the MNC units helps to determine if the locally acquired knowledge could benefit other units of the MNC. Research limitations/implications The present study defines the architectural distance between the MNC and the cluster. This architectural distance is defined by a vector composed of social, organisational, cultural, institutional, technological and geographic distances between the new acquisition and its network of local partners, on the one hand, and the MNC, on the other. Knowledge transfer also depends on the business players’ trust and motivation. Further research through a quantitative study would be useful to improve the links between the proposed mathematical model and the efficiency of an MNC’s location within a cluster. Practical implications The solution to the optimisation problem allows to put forward a simple decision criterion to assist a manager who has to face the problem of an optimal location choice. Originality/value First, this study contributes to a better understanding of how knowledge transfer effects may interact with cluster effects, while explaining a subsidiary’s performance with regard to location. Second, it provides an interpretation of the concept of knowledge embeddedness by showing that the effective transfer of architectural and specific knowledge involves the prior sharing of a certain amount of this knowledge.

[1]  Mats Forsgren,et al.  Subsidiary Embeddedness and Competence Development in MNCs A Multi-Level Analysis , 2001 .

[2]  Li Li,et al.  The effects of trust and shared vision on inward knowledge transfer in subsidiaries' intra- and inter-organizational relationships , 2005 .

[3]  R. Parente,et al.  Determinants of cross-national knowledge transfer and its effect on firm innovation , 2007 .

[4]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks , 1998 .

[5]  E. Vaara,et al.  Cultural differences and capability transfer in cross-border acquisitions: the mediating roles of capability complementarity, absorptive capacity, and social integration , 2007 .

[6]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[7]  F. Xavier Molina-Morales,et al.  Too much love in the neighborhood can hurt: how an excess of intensity and trust in relationships may produce negative effects on firms , 2009 .

[8]  A. Ferraris,et al.  Rethinking the literature on “multiple embeddedness” and subsidiary-specific advantages , 2014 .

[9]  O. Shenkar,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL DISTANCE AND THE MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISE , 2002 .

[10]  Edward Lorenz,et al.  Collective Learning, Tacit Knowledge and Regional Innovative Capacity , 1999 .

[11]  G. Zaccour,et al.  Pricing and Advertising of Private and National Brands in a Dynamic Marketing Channel , 2008 .

[12]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[13]  P. N. Figueiredo,et al.  The Role of Dual Embeddedness in the Innovative Performance of MNE Subsidiaries: Evidence from Brazil , 2011 .

[14]  Stephen Tallman,et al.  Communities, alliances, networks and knowledge in multinational firms: A micro-analytic framework , 2011 .

[15]  Nick Henry,et al.  From ‘industrial districts’ to ‘knowledge clusters’: a model of knowledge dissemination and competitive advantage in industrial agglomerations , 2003 .

[16]  Robert E. Spekman,et al.  The dark side of alliances:: Lessons from Volvo–Renault , 1998 .

[17]  Tony W. Tong,et al.  How much does subnational region matter to foreign subsidiary performance? Evidence from Fortune Global 500 Corporations’ investment in China , 2013 .

[18]  J. Knoben,et al.  Proximity and Inter-Organizational Collaboration: A Literature Review , 2006 .

[19]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[20]  Bernard L. Simonin.  Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances , 1999 .

[21]  S. Albers,et al.  Crisis Construction and Organizational Learning: Capability Building in Catching-Up at Hyundai Motor , 1998 .

[22]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[23]  Frédéric Deroïan.  Formation of social networks and diffusion of innovations , 2002 .

[24]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[25]  Thomas Hutzschenreuter,et al.  Performance effects of “added cultural distance” in the path of international expansion: the case of German multinational enterprises , 2008 .

[26]  R. Narula,et al.  Multinational Enterprises and Local Contexts: The Opportunities and Challenges of Multiple Embeddedness , 2011 .

[27]  Torben Pedersen,et al.  Host-country environment and subsidiary competence: Extending the diamond network model , 2009 .

[28]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[29]  Timothy T. Baldwin,et al.  THE PERILS OF PARTICIPATION: EFFECTS OF CHOICE OF TRAINING ON TRAINEE MOTIVATION AND LEARNING , 1991 .

[30]  P. Almeida,et al.  Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: the influence of the MNC and host country on innovation , 2004 .

[31]  H. Barkema,et al.  Learning Through Acquisitions , 2001 .

[32]  Bou-Wen Lin,et al.  How does knowledge depth moderate the performance of internal and external knowledge sourcing strategies , 2010 .

[33]  Virginie Jacquier-roux,et al.  L’objectif de l’internationalisation de la R&D des firmes : de la circulation au partage de connaissances tacites situées , 2011 .

[34]  R. Boschma.  Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment , 2005 .

[35]  N. Driffield,et al.  Industrial districts, inward foreign investment and regional development , 2010 .

[36]  C. Cooper,et al.  A Sociocultural Perspective on Knowledge Transfer in Mergers and Acquisitions , 2016 .

[37]  Stephen Tallman,et al.  Knowledge, clusters, and competitive advantage , 2004 .

[38]  R. Narula.  Exploring the paradox of competence‐creating subsidiaries : balancing bandwidth and dispersion in MNEs , 2014 .

[39]  Stephen Tallman,et al.  The shifting geography of competitive advantage: Clusters, networks and firms , 2010 .

[40]  E. Schein.  Culture: The Missing Concept in Organization Studies. , 1996 .

[41]  T. Kostova.  Transnational Transfer of Strategic Organizational Practices: A Contextual Perspective , 1999 .

[42]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE IN MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS , 2002 .

[43]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[44]  V. Roger,et al.  The Heart Failure Epidemic , 2010, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[45]  Aya S. Chacar,et al.  International coherence and MNE performance , 2015 .

[46]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Knowledge Management Processes and International Joint Ventures , 1998 .

[47]  Scott Shane,et al.  National Cultural Distance and Cross-Border Acquisition Performance , 1998 .

[48]  D. North.  Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Economic performance , 1990 .

[49]  Andreas Voigt,et al.  Do Cultural Differences Matter in Mergers and Acquisitions? A Tentative Model and Examination , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[50]  B. Chakravarthy,et al.  The persistence of knowledge‐based advantage: an empirical test for product performance and technological knowledge , 2002 .

[51]  G. Zaltman,et al.  Innovations and organizations , 2020, Organizational Innovation.

[52]  B. Frey,et al.  Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms , 2000 .

[53]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[54]  Yongbin Wei,et al.  Factors of stickiness in transfers of know-how between MNC units , 2012, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[55]  A. Schmitt,et al.  Proximity strategies in outsourcing relations: The role of geographical, cultural and relational proximity in the European automotive industry , 2013 .

[56]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[57]  J. Cantwell,et al.  The location of technological activities of MNCs in European regions: The role of spillovers and local competencies , 2001 .

[58]  G. Ahuja.  Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[59]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  Geography, Networks, and Knowledge Flow , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[60]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[61]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[62]  Aija Leiponen,et al.  A measure of technological distance , 2012 .

[63]  P. Ghauri,et al.  Key factors affecting acquisition of technological capabilities from foreign acquiring firms by small and medium sized local firms , 2011 .

[64]  Herb Brody,et al.  Seven thinkers in search of an information highway , 1994 .

[65]  D. Leszczyńska.  Historical trajectory and knowledge embeddedness: a case study in the French perfume cluster , 2013 .

[66]  Hsien-Che Lai,et al.  Accessing External Technological Knowledge for Technological Development: When Technological Knowledge Distance Meets Slack Resources , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[67]  Jannika Mattes,et al.  Dimensions of Proximity and Knowledge Bases: Innovation between Spatial and Non-spatial Factors , 2012 .

[68]  G. Hamel.  Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances , 1991 .

[69]  Mosad Zineldin,et al.  Strategic alliance: synergies and challenges , 2003 .

[70]  Peter J. Buckley,et al.  The internalisation theory of the multinational enterprise: A review of the progress of a research agenda after 30 years , 2009 .

[71]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge flows within multinational corporations , 2000 .

[72]  André Torre,et al.  Proximity and Localization , 2005 .

[73]  Andrew Delios,et al.  Political Hazards, Experience and Sequential Entry Strategies: The International Expansion of Japanese Firms, 1980-1998 , 2003 .

[74]  Gian Italo Bischi,et al.  A dynamic model of oligopoly with R&D externalities along networks. Part I , 2012, Math. Comput. Simul..

[75]  M. Hitt,et al.  Attributes of Successful and Unsuccessful Acquisitions of US Firms , 1998 .

[76]  P. Cohendet,et al.  The Economics Of Knowledge: The Debate About Codification And Tacit Knowledge , 2000 .

[77]  H. Barkema,et al.  International Expansion Through Start-Up or Acquisition: A Learning Perspective , 1998 .

[78]  T. Kostova,et al.  Adoption of an Organizational Practice by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations: Institutional and Relational Effects , 2002 .

[79]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  An Examination of Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer: China-Singapore Suzhou Industrial Park , 2006 .

[80]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[81]  Dorota Leszczynska,et al.  The evolution of knowledge transfer and the location of a multinational corporation: Theory and mathematical model , 2015 .

[82]  T. Pedersen,et al.  Knowledge Transfer and Accommodation Effects in Multinational Corporations , 2013 .

[83]  Ulf R. Andersson,et al.  Subsidiary embeddedness and control in the multinational corporation , 1996 .

[84]  J. Dunning,et al.  An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: The co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment , 2009 .

[85]  S. Ghoshal.  Global strategy: An organizing framework , 1987 .

[86]  M. Gowan,et al.  Impact of National Origin and Entry Mode on Trust and Organizational Commitment , 2002 .

[87]  Paloma Miravitlles,et al.  Knowledge sharing and subsidiary R&D mandate development: A matter of dual embeddedness , 2014 .

[88]  Sharon F. Matusik,et al.  The Utilization of Contingent Work, Knowledge Creation, and Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[89]  Jone L. Pearce,et al.  Crossing cultures: insights from master teachers , 2003 .

[90]  Elisa Giuliani,et al.  Network dynamics in regional clusters: Evidence from Chile , 2013 .

[91]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Empirical Tests of Optimal Cognitive Distance , 2004 .

[92]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Characteristics of Foreign Subsidiaries in Industry Clusters , 2000 .

[93]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[94]  Franz Huber,et al.  On the Role and Interrelationship of Spatial, Social and Cognitive Proximity: Personal Knowledge Relationships of R&D Workers in the Cambridge Information Technology Cluster , 2012 .

[95]  E. Hippel.  Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[96]  Oliver E. Williamson,et al.  Comparative Economic Organization—Within and Between Countries , 1999, Business and Politics.

[97]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Innovation and inter-firm linkages: new implications for policy , 1999 .

[98]  Ulf R. Andersson,et al.  Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNC: a business network view , 2007 .

[99]  Ruth V. Aguilera,et al.  How well do supranational regional grouping schemes fit international business research models? , 2013 .

[100]  G. Hoetker,et al.  Choice and performance of governance mechanisms: matching alliance governance to asset type , 2009 .

[101]  Ulf Andersson,et al.  Managing the transfer of capabilities within multinational corporations:: the dual role of the subsidiary , 2003 .

[102]  P. Buckley.  The impact of the global factory on economic development , 2009 .