Influence of environmental conditions on shear–force distance control in near-field optical microscopy

In our experiments we show, that a contaminating water film is very important for the shear–force distance control in near-field optical microscopy. This is demonstrated at the transition between a hydrophilic glass surface and a hydrophobic Langmuir–Blodgett film of arachidic acid at different relative humidities. This contaminating water film is one, if not the important reason for the damping of an oscillating fiber during surface approach. It is further shown, that the bulk viscosity of water alone cannot be responsible for the observed damping effect. A thickness dependent viscosity of this water film is proposed. These observations can also explain, why the shear–force distance control works on nearly all surfaces at ambient conditions, but fails to work at very low temperatures.

[1]  R. Toledo-Crow,et al.  Near‐field differential scanning optical microscope with atomic force regulation , 1992 .

[2]  O. Marti,et al.  Distance control in near-field optical microscopy with piezoelectrical shear-force detection suitable for imaging in liquids , 1997 .

[3]  D. Courjon,et al.  Influence of the water layer on the shear force damping in near-field microscopy , 1998 .

[4]  U. Hartmann,et al.  Fundamentals and Special Applications of Non-Contact Scanning Force Microscopy , 1993 .

[5]  B. S. Deaver,et al.  A nonoptical tip–sample distance control method for near‐field scanning optical microscopy using impedance changes in an electromechanical system , 1995 .

[6]  Eric Betzig,et al.  Design and implementation of a low temperature near‐field scanning optical microscope , 1994 .

[7]  O. Marti,et al.  Piezoelectrical shear-force control on soft biological samples in aqueous solution , 1997 .

[8]  M Heim,et al.  Scanning tunneling microscopy of insulators and biological specimens based on lateral conductivity of ultrathin water films. , 1994, Science.

[9]  K. Karrai,et al.  Piezoelectric tip‐sample distance control for near field optical microscopes , 1995 .

[10]  E. Betzig,et al.  Combined shear force and near‐field scanning optical microscopy , 1992 .

[11]  G. H. Morrison,et al.  Parameter control, characterization, and optimization in the fabrication of optical fiber near-field probes. , 1995, Applied optics.

[12]  W. Denk,et al.  Optical stethoscopy: Image recording with resolution λ/20 , 1984 .

[13]  P. Fromherz,et al.  Medium angle X-ray scattering of Langmuir-Blodgett films of cadmium salts of fatty acids , 1988 .

[14]  A. Menzel,et al.  STRUCTURE AND PHONONS OF THE ICE SURFACE , 1998 .

[15]  C. Durkan,et al.  Investigation of the physical mechanisms of shear‐force imaging , 1996 .

[16]  J. Frommer,et al.  Effect of Capillary Force on Friction Force Microscopy : A Scanning Hydrophilicity Microscope , 1996 .

[17]  Tosatti,et al.  Layering transition in confined molecular thin films: Nucleation and growth. , 1994, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[18]  R. Ulbrich,et al.  Probe‐surface interaction in near‐field optical microscopy: The nonlinear bending force mechanism , 1996 .

[19]  M. Salmeron,et al.  Imaging the Condensation and Evaporation of Molecularly Thin Films of Water with Nanometer Resolution , 1995, Science.