Who said what? The effects of speech tempo on target detection and information extraction in a multi-talker situation: An ERP and functional connectivity study.

People with normal hearing can usually follow one of the several concurrent speakers. Speech tempo affects both the separation of concurrent speech streams and information extraction from them. The current study varied the tempo of two concurrent speech streams to investigate these processes in a multi-talker situation. Listeners performed a target-detection and a content-tracking task, while target-related ERPs and functional brain networks sensitive to speech tempo were extracted from the EEG signal. At slower than normal speech tempo, building the two streams required longer processing times, and possibly the utilization of higher-order, for example, syntactic and semantic cues. The observed longer reaction times and higher connectivity strength in a theta band network associated with frontal control over auditory/speech processing are compatible with this notion. With increasing tempo, target detection performance decreased and the N2b and the P3b amplitudes increased. These data suggest an increased need for strictly allocating target-detection-related resources at higher tempo. This was also reflected by the observed increase in the strength of gamma-band networks within and between frontal, temporal, and cingular areas. At the fastest tested speech tempo, there was a sharp drop in recognition memory performance, while target detection performance increased compared to the normal speech tempo. This was accompanied by a significant increase in the strength of a low alpha network associated with the suppression of task-irrelevant speech. These results suggest that participants prioritized the immediate target detection task over the continuous content tracking, likely due to some capacity limit reached the fastest speech tempo.

[1]  Jack S. Fogarty,et al.  Components in the P300: Don't forget the Novelty P3! , 2020, Psychophysiology.

[2]  I. Winkler,et al.  The effects of speech processing units on auditory stream segregation and selective attention in a multi-talker (cocktail party) situation , 2020, Cortex.

[3]  I. Winkler,et al.  Linguistic predictability influences auditory stimulus classification within two concurrent speech streams. , 2020, Psychophysiology.

[4]  J. Coyne,et al.  Prevention of suicidal behaviour: Results of a controlled community-based intervention study in four European countries , 2019, PloS one.

[5]  Avelie Stuart,et al.  United in Diversity, Divided in Adversity? Support for Right-Wing Eurosceptic Parties in the Face of Threat Differs Across Nations , 2019, Front. Psychol..

[6]  I. Winkler,et al.  Neuronal Correlates of Informational and Energetic Masking in the Human Brain in a Multi-Talker Situation , 2019, Front. Psychol..

[7]  István Winkler,et al.  Attention and speech-processing related functional brain networks activated in a multi-speaker environment , 2019, PloS one.

[8]  I. Winkler,et al.  The effects of attention and task-relevance on the processing of syntactic violations during listening to two concurrent speech streams , 2018, Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience.

[9]  Stefan Debener,et al.  Source-Modeling Auditory Processes of EEG Data Using EEGLAB and Brainstorm , 2018, Front. Neurosci..

[10]  Jonathan Z. Simon,et al.  Overlapping communities reveal rich structure in large-scale brain networks during rest and task conditions , 2016, NeuroImage.

[11]  Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen,et al.  A Tutorial Review of Functional Connectivity Analysis Methods and Their Interpretational Pitfalls , 2016, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[12]  D. Tucker,et al.  EEG source localization: Sensor density and head surface coverage , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[13]  Yu Huang,et al.  The New York Head—A precise standardized volume conductor model for EEG source localization and tES targeting , 2015, NeuroImage.

[14]  Claus C Hilgetag,et al.  Occipitoparietal alpha-band responses to the graded allocation of top-down spatial attention. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Spatial and temporal relationships of electrocorticographic alpha and gamma activity during auditory processing , 2014, NeuroImage.

[16]  Jonas Obleser,et al.  Cortical alpha oscillations as a tool for auditory selective inhibition , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[17]  Charles M. Gaona,et al.  Frequency-specific mechanism links human brain networks for spatial attention , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Matti S. Hämäläinen,et al.  Dynamic Oscillatory Processes Governing Cued Orienting and Allocation of Auditory Attention , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  Yong He,et al.  BrainNet Viewer: A Network Visualization Tool for Human Brain Connectomics , 2013, PloS one.

[20]  Radek Mareček,et al.  On the Time Course of Synchronization Patterns of Neuronal Discharges in the Human Brain during Cognitive Tasks , 2013, PloS one.

[21]  I. Winkler,et al.  Event-related potential correlates of sound organization: Early sensory and late cognitive effects , 2013, Biological Psychology.

[22]  Takayuki Nozawa,et al.  Spatiotemporal Dynamics of High-Gamma Activities during a 3-Stimulus Visual Oddball Task , 2013, PloS one.

[23]  Arno Klein,et al.  101 Labeled Brain Images and a Consistent Human Cortical Labeling Protocol , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[24]  C. Stam,et al.  The organization of physiological brain networks , 2012, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[25]  Susan Denham,et al.  Multistability in auditory stream segregation: a predictive coding view , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  A. Nobre,et al.  Top-down modulation: bridging selective attention and working memory , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  Markus Butz,et al.  Sustained gamma band synchronization in early visual areas reflects the level of selective attention , 2012, NeuroImage.

[28]  John J. Foxe,et al.  The Role of Alpha-Band Brain Oscillations as a Sensory Suppression Mechanism during Selective Attention , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[29]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Brainstorm: A User-Friendly Application for MEG/EEG Analysis , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[30]  Théodore Papadopoulo,et al.  Forward Field Computation with OpenMEEG , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[31]  J. Fell,et al.  The role of phase synchronization in memory processes , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[32]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Network-based statistic: Identifying differences in brain networks , 2010, NeuroImage.

[33]  Antoine J. Shahin,et al.  Attentional Gain Control of Ongoing Cortical Speech Representations in a “Cocktail Party” , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  Francois-Xavier Alario,et al.  Distinct representations of phonemes, syllables, and supra-syllabic sequences in the speech production network , 2009, NeuroImage.

[35]  Lisa D. Sanders,et al.  Listeners modulate temporally selective attention during natural speech processing , 2009, Biological Psychology.

[36]  Virginia Best,et al.  Object continuity enhances selective auditory attention , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Andrea R. Halpern,et al.  Melody recognition at fast and slow tempos: Effects of age, experience, and familiarity , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  P. Rossini,et al.  Neuromagnetic functional coupling during dichotic listening of speech sounds , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[39]  Niels Birbaumer,et al.  Cross-frequency phase synchronization: A brain mechanism of memory matching and attention , 2008, NeuroImage.

[40]  W. Klimesch,et al.  Event-related phase reorganization may explain evoked neural dynamics , 2007, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[41]  C. Stam,et al.  Phase lag index: Assessment of functional connectivity from multi channel EEG and MEG with diminished bias from common sources , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[42]  J. Polich Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[43]  J. Snyder,et al.  Toward a neurophysiological theory of auditory stream segregation. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[44]  J. Polich,et al.  Normative Variation of P3a and P3b from a Large Sample , 2007 .

[45]  Yoko Yamaguchi,et al.  Human cortical circuits for central executive function emerge by theta phase synchronization , 2007, NeuroImage.

[46]  T. Womelsdorf,et al.  The role of neuronal synchronization in selective attention , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[47]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Enhanced detection of artifacts in EEG data using higher-order statistics and independent component analysis , 2007, NeuroImage.

[48]  I. Winkler,et al.  The role of predictive models in the formation of auditory streams , 2006, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[49]  Manuel Schabus,et al.  Fronto-parietal EEG coherence in theta and upper alpha reflect central executive functions of working memory. , 2005, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[50]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  The Role of the Medial Frontal Cortex in Cognitive Control , 2004, Science.

[51]  J. Palva,et al.  Distinct Gamma-Band Evoked Responses to Speech and Non-Speech Sounds in Humans , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  J. Polich,et al.  P300 as a clinical assay: rationale, evaluation, and findings. , 2000, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[53]  J. Cohen,et al.  Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. , 2000, Science.

[54]  Albert S. Bregman,et al.  Effects of time intervals and tone durations on auditory stream segregation , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[55]  G. Mangun,et al.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[56]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Design and construction of a realistic digital brain phantom , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[57]  Lee Osterhout,et al.  On the Brain Response to Syntactic Anomalies: Manipulations of Word Position and Word Class Reveal Individual Differences , 1997, Brain and Language.

[58]  J. Polich,et al.  Cognitive and biological determinants of P300: an integrative review , 1995, Biological Psychology.

[59]  M. Potter,et al.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[60]  T. Crystal,et al.  Articulation rate and the duration of syllables and stress groups in connected speech. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[61]  R. Näätänen The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[62]  J P Rosenfeld,et al.  Parietal P3 response as an indicator of stimulus categorization: increased P3 amplitude to categorically deviant target and nontarget stimuli. , 1990, Psychophysiology.

[63]  E. Donchin,et al.  Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[64]  Stuart Anstis,et al.  Adaptation to auditory streaming of frequency-modulated tones. , 1985 .

[65]  P. Michie,et al.  Selective Attention Effects on Somatosensory Event‐Related Potentials , 1984, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[66]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[67]  H G Vaughan,et al.  Event-related potential correlates of two stages of information processing in physical and semantic discrimination tasks. , 1983, Psychophysiology.

[68]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Stimulus deviance and evoked potentials , 1982, Biological Psychology.

[69]  E. Donchin,et al.  P300 and tracking difficulty: evidence for multiple resources in dual-task performance. , 1980, Psychophysiology.

[70]  D Friedman,et al.  A brain event related to the making of a sensory discrimination. , 1979, Science.

[71]  E. C. Cherry Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears , 1953 .

[72]  J. Ford,et al.  Relationships between pre-stimulus γ power and subsequent P300 and reaction time breakdown in schizophrenia. , 2011, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[73]  A. Dale,et al.  Functional Parcellation of Attentional Control Regions of the Brain , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[74]  J. Polich Theoretical Overview of P3a and P3b , 2003 .

[75]  A. Burgess,et al.  Paradox lost? Exploring the role of alpha oscillations during externally vs. internally directed attention and the implications for idling and inhibition hypotheses. , 2003, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[76]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Functional imaging with low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA): a review. , 2002, Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology.

[77]  J J Riera,et al.  Evaluation of inverse methods and head models for EEG source localization using a human skull phantom , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.