Subpixel hyperspectral target detection using local spectral and spatial information

We present two methods to improve three hyperspectral stochastic algorithms for target detection; the algorithms are the constrained energy minimization, the generalized likelihood ratio test, and the adaptive coherence estimator. The original algorithms rely solely on spectral information and do not use spatial information; this usage is normally justified in subpixel target detection, since the target size is smaller than the size of a pixel. However, we found that since the background (and the false alarms) may be spatially correlated and the point spread function can distribute the energy of a point target between several neighboring pixels, the implementation of spatial filtering algorithms considerably improved target detection. Our first improvement used the local spatial mean and covariance matrices, which take into account the spatial local mean instead of the global mean. While this concept has been found in the literature, the effect of its implementation in both the estimated mean and the covariance matrix is examined quantitatively here. The second was based on the fact that the effect of a target of physical subpixel size will extend to a cluster of pixels. We tested our algorithms by using the data set and scoring methodology of the Rochester Institute of Technology Target Detection Blind Test project. The results showed that both spatial methods independently improved the basic spectral algorithms mentioned above, and when the two methods were used together, the results were even better.

[1]  Gary A. Shaw,et al.  Hyperspectral subpixel target detection using the linear mixing model , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[2]  John P. Kerekes,et al.  Misregistration impacts on hyperspectral target detection , 2009 .

[3]  W. Farrand Mapping the distribution of mine tailings in the Coeur d'Alene River Valley, Idaho, through the use of a constrained energy minimization technique , 1997 .

[4]  Jonathan Martin Mooney,et al.  Automated clustering/segmentation of hyperspectral images based on histogram thresholding , 2002, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[5]  Vincent Roy Hybrid algorithm for hyperspectral target detection , 2010, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[6]  E. J. Kelly An Adaptive Detection Algorithm , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[7]  Dimitris G. Manolakis,et al.  Detection algorithms for hyperspectral imaging applications , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[8]  Jeffrey H. Bowles,et al.  Results of GLMM-based target detection on the RIT data set , 2010, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[9]  Marin S. Halper Global, local, and stochastic background modeling for target detection in mixed pixels , 2010, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[10]  William F. Basener Clutter and anomaly removal for enhanced target detection , 2010, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[11]  Dimitris Manolakis,et al.  Hyperspectral signal models and implications to material detection algorithms , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[12]  S.R. Rotman,et al.  Improved covariance matrices for point target detection in hyperspectral data , 2008, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Microwaves, Communications, Antennas and Electronics Systems.

[13]  Marcus S. Stefanou,et al.  Analysis of false alarm distributions in the development and evaluation of hyperspectral point target detection algorithms , 2007 .

[14]  D. Manolakis,et al.  Detection algorithms for hyperspectral imaging applications: a signal processing perspective , 2003, IEEE Workshop on Advances in Techniques for Analysis of Remotely Sensed Data, 2003.

[15]  R. Jenssen,et al.  1 THE HYMAP TM AIRBORNE HYPERSPECTRAL SENSOR : THE SYSTEM , CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE , 1998 .

[16]  John P. Kerekes,et al.  Development of a Web-Based Application to Evaluate Target Finding Algorithms , 2008, IGARSS 2008 - 2008 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[17]  John P. Kerekes,et al.  Unresolved target detection blind test project overview , 2010, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[18]  Jeff Settle,et al.  On constrained energy minimization and the partial unmixing of multispectral images , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[19]  Dimitris G. Manolakis,et al.  Taxonomy of detection algorithms for hyperspectral imaging applications , 2005 .

[20]  Dimitris G. Manolakis Is there a best hyperspectral detection algorithm , 2009 .

[21]  Qian Du,et al.  Hyperspectral target detection assessment using an online evaluation system , 2010, Defense + Commercial Sensing.