Assessment of Total Quality Management Practices and Organizational Development . ( The case of Telecom Services Sector of Pakistan )

The main purpose of this study is to determine the various benefits an organization can derive from the application of total quality management practices, or the relationship between total quality management and quality outcomes/benefits in services sector of telecom industry of Pakistan. The study is based on primary and secondary data. Eight most important constructs were found through literature review for conceptual framework in this study. Primary data is collected through questionnaires. The same questionnaire was used in comparison of TQM practices in different countries such as India, USA, Mexico, China and Norway. The theoretical framework adopted is by Raghunathan et al. (1999). Findings revealed that TQM practices and implementation have positive effects on quality benefits or outcome (productivity, profitability, competitive position, reduce customer complaints, cost reduction, reduce rework level, reduces scrap level, stay in business) in services sector of telecom industry of Pakistan. Benchmarking also plays a significant role in the development of organizations. In addition to the research data, findings from different field studies and other research works have further supported conclusion drawn from this research, that TQM practices have positive effect on organizational development. The findings based on this empirical research would be useful to both decision makers and researchers.

[1]  R. Saravanan,et al.  The impact of total quality service age on quality and operational performance: an empirical study , 2007 .

[2]  Sanjay L. Ahire,et al.  Development and Validation of TQM Implementation Constructs , 1996 .

[3]  Lena Abrahamsson,et al.  TQM: an act of balance between contradictions , 2007 .

[4]  Uma Kumar,et al.  Performance measurement by TQM adopters , 2007 .

[5]  S. S. Rao,et al.  A Framework for International Quality Management Research: Development and Validation of a Measurement Instrument , 1999 .

[6]  Barrie Dale,et al.  Total quality management: origins and evolution of the term , 1998 .

[7]  Hsin Hsin Chang,et al.  Development of performance measurement systems in quality management organisations , 2006 .

[8]  A. V. Feigenbaum The power behind consumer buying and productivity , 2002 .

[9]  Carol Lindborg Everett Penn State's Commitment to quality improvement , 2002 .

[10]  John S. Oakland,et al.  Total Quality Management: Text with Cases , 1995 .

[11]  Mohamed Zairi,et al.  An empirical study of key elements of total quality-based performance measurement systems: A case study approach in the service industry sector , 2001 .

[12]  Noorliza Karia,et al.  The effects of total quality management practices on employees' work‐related attitudes , 2006 .

[13]  Marsha Willard,et al.  Sustainability: Enlarging quality's mission , 2002 .

[14]  Samir Baidoun,et al.  An empirical study of critical factors of TQM in Palestinian organizations , 2003 .

[15]  Therese Anne Joiner,et al.  Total quality management and performance: The role of organization support and co‐worker support , 2007 .

[16]  N. A. Dayton,et al.  Total quality management critical success factors, a comparison: The UK versus the USA , 2001 .

[17]  Jung‐Lang Cheng,et al.  Implementing Six Sigma via TQM improvement: an empirical study in Taiwan , 2008 .

[18]  Juan José Tarí,et al.  Critical factors and results of quality management: An empirical study , 2003 .

[19]  Zahirul Hoque,et al.  TQM implementation in a public sector entity in Fiji: Public sector reform, commercialization, and institutionalism , 2002 .

[20]  K. Dervitsiotis Benchmarking and business paradigm shifts , 2000 .

[21]  Gopal Kanji,et al.  Performance Measurement andBusiness Excellence: The Reinforcing Link for the Public Sector , 2007 .

[22]  Joseph Moses Juran,et al.  Made in U.S.A.: a renaissance in quality. , 1993, Harvard business review.