Global online meetings in virtual teams: from media choice to interaction negotiation

This paper draws on an ethnographical study of a community of technology experts within a global automotive manufacturing company that uses information technology to communicate and collaborate in global virtual teams. Our findings show that discussions, negotiations, compromises and joint problem solving characterize media choices made in virtual teamwork. Practitioners are adding new media to ongoing interactions, rather than using media in sequence. Furthermore, one medium is not used exclusively, rather a number of media can be used in parallel. This shows that some of the fundamental assumptions built into the concept of media choice theories, are somewhat problematic as an analytical perspective when virtual teams are researched in real settings outside of laboratories and hypothetical scenarios.

[1]  Lucy Gilson,et al.  Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here? , 2004 .

[2]  Andrew May,et al.  A case study of virtual team working in the European automotive industry , 2001 .

[3]  J. Bal,et al.  Virtual teaming in the automotive supply chain , 1999 .

[4]  Ingrid Mulder,et al.  Virtual Teams and the Appropriation of Communication Technology: Exploring the Concept of Media Stickiness , 2003, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[5]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research , 2005 .

[6]  John A Scigliano,et al.  Mastering Virtual Teams: Strategies, Tools, and Techniques that Succeed: Deborah L. Duarte and Nancy Tennant Snyder. (2000). 2nd ed., San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 256 pages. ISBN: 0-7879-5589-2W01. US$39.95, includes a CD-ROM , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[7]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  Bridging Global Boundaries for IS Project Success , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[8]  R. Daft,et al.  Media Symbolism, Media Richness, and Media Choice in Organizations , 1987 .

[9]  G. Button.  The ethnographic tradition and design , 2000 .

[10]  R. Daft,et al.  Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design , 1983 .

[11]  Maureen S. Battistella,et al.  Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization , 1991 .

[12]  A. Adam.  Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[13]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Media, Tasks, and Communication Processes: A Theory of Media Synchronicity , 2008, MIS Q..

[14]  R. Rice.  Task Analyzability, Use of New Media, and Effectiveness: A Multi-Site Exploration of Media Richness , 1992 .

[15]  Kai Riemer,et al.  Contextualising Media Choice Using Genre Analysis , 2009, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[16]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[17]  Stefano Brusoni,et al.  The Impact of Virtual Technologies on Organizational Knowledge Creation: An Empirical Study , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[18]  Geilson Loureiro,et al.  Complex systems concurrent engineering : collaboration, technology innovation and sustainability , 2007 .

[19]  Claudiano Sales Araujo,et al.  The Effects of Teams’ Co-location on Project Performance , 2007 .

[20]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Emerging Theories of Communication in Organizations , 1991 .

[21]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[22]  Cristina B. Gibson,et al.  “Exporting” teams: enhancing the implementation and effectiveness of work teams in global affiliates , 2001 .

[23]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[24]  Andreas Larsson,et al.  Making sense of collaboration: the challenge of thinking together in global design teams , 2003, GROUP.

[25]  A. Sivunen,et al.  Team leaders' technology choice in virtual teams , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[26]  M. Grant,et al.  Communities of practice. , 2020, Health progress.

[27]  Louis A. Lefebvre,et al.  Cross-Border E-Collaboration for New Product Development in the Automotive Industry , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[28]  Torsten Holmer,et al.  Bridging the Gap Between Media Synchronicity and Task Performance , 2009, Commun. Res..

[29]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  Vital Signs for Virtual Teams: An Empirically Developed Trigger Model for Technology Adaptation Interventions , 2010, MIS Q..

[30]  Zahari Taha,et al.  Virtual Teams: A Literature Review , 2009 .

[31]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Learning from Notes: organizational issues in groupware implementation , 1992, CSCW '92.

[32]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Rethinking media richness: towards a theory of media synchronicity , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[33]  Pamela R. Johnson,et al.  The “wonderland” of virtual teams , 2001 .

[34]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Testing Media Richness Theory in the New Media: The Effects of Cues, Feedback, and Task Equivocality , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..