Bootstrapping Topological Properties and Systemic Risk of Complex Networks Using the Fitness Model

In this paper we present a novel method to reconstruct global topological properties of a complex network starting from limited information. We assume to know for all the nodes a non-topological quantity that we interpret as fitness. In contrast, we assume to know the degree, i.e. the number of connections, only for a subset of the nodes in the network. We then use a fitness model, calibrated on the subset of nodes for which degrees are known, in order to generate ensembles of networks. Here, we focus on topological properties that are relevant for processes of contagion and distress propagation in networks, i.e. network density and k-core structure, and we study how well these properties can be estimated as a function of the size of the subset of nodes utilized for the calibration. Finally, we also study how well the resilience to distress propagation in the network can be estimated using our method. We perform a first test on ensembles of synthetic networks generated with the Exponential Random Graph model, which allows to apply common tools from statistical mechanics. We then perform a second test on empirical networks taken from economic and financial contexts. In both cases, we find that a subset as small as 10 % of nodes can be enough to estimate the properties of the network along with its resilience with an error of 5 %.

[1]  M. A. Muñoz,et al.  Scale-free networks from varying vertex intrinsic fitness. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[2]  G. Caldarelli,et al.  DebtRank: Too Central to Fail? Financial Networks, the FED and Systemic Risk , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[3]  Lev Muchnik,et al.  Identifying influential spreaders in complex networks , 2010, 1001.5285.

[4]  S. Battiston,et al.  Liaisons Dangereuses: Increasing Connectivity, Risk Sharing, and Systemic Risk , 2009 .

[5]  M. Newman,et al.  Hierarchical structure and the prediction of missing links in networks , 2008, Nature.

[6]  D. Garlaschelli,et al.  Self-organized network evolution coupled to extremal dynamics , 2006, cond-mat/0611201.

[7]  M. Newman,et al.  Statistical mechanics of networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[8]  Roma,et al.  Fitness model for the Italian interbank money market. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Scaling in currency exchange , 1997 .

[10]  Diego Garlaschelli,et al.  Fitness-dependent topological properties of the world trade web. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[11]  Hans Degryse,et al.  Interbank Exposures: An Empirical Examination of Systemic Risk in the Belgian Banking System , 2004 .

[12]  Giorgio Fagiolo,et al.  The international-trade network: gravity equations and topological properties , 2009, 0908.2086.

[13]  Paolo Emilio Mistrulli,et al.  Assessing Financial Contagion in the Interbank Market: Maximum Entropy Versus Observed Interbank Lending Patterns , 2007 .

[14]  Iman van Lelyveld,et al.  Interbank Contagion in the Dutch Banking Sector , 2004 .

[15]  D. Garlaschelli,et al.  The scale-free topology of market investments , 2003, cond-mat/0310503.

[16]  Sergey N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Lectures on Complex Networks , 2010 .

[17]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[18]  Diego Garlaschelli,et al.  Analytical maximum-likelihood method to detect patterns in real networks , 2011, 1103.0701.

[19]  Matteo Marsili,et al.  Reconstruction of financial networks for robust estimation of systemic risk , 2011 .