Mechanical efficiency and user power requirement with a pushrim activated power assisted wheelchair.

The objective of this study was to quantify the difference in mechanical efficiency and user power generation between traditional manual wheelchairs and a pushrim activated power assisted wheelchair (PAPAW). Ten manual wheelchair users were evaluated in a repeated measures design trial with and without the PAPAW for propulsion efficiency. Subjects propelled a Quickie GP equipped with the PAPAW and their own chair on a computer controlled wheelchair dynamometer at five different resistance levels. Power output, user power with the PAPAW hubs, subjects' oxygen consumption per minute and mechanical efficiency were analyzed. Metabolic energy and user power were significantly lower (p<0.05), and mechanical efficiency significantly higher with the PAPAW than with subjects' own chairs. Subjects needed to generate on average 3.65 times more power when propelling their own wheelchairs as compared to PAPAW. Mean mechanical efficiency over all trials was 80.33% higher with the power assisted hubs. PAPAW provides on average 73% of the total power when subjects propel with power assistance. Significantly increased efficiency and reduced requirement of user power is achieved using the PAPAW. With use, the PAPAW may contribute to delaying secondary injuries of manual wheelchair users. In addition, it may be suitable for people who have (or at risk for) upper extremity joint degeneration, reduced exercise capacity, low strength or endurance who currently use electric powered wheelchairs.

[1]  R. Waters,et al.  Carpal tunnel syndrome in paraplegic patients. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  Rory A. Cooper,et al.  Performance assessment of a pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchair control system , 2002, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[3]  H E Veeger,et al.  Effectiveness of force application in manual wheelchair propulsion in persons with spinal cord injuries. , 1998, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[4]  R A Cooper,et al.  Dynamic calibration of a wheelchair dynamometer. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[5]  Relationship between maximal oxygen uptake on different ergometers, lean arm volume and strength in paraplegic subjects , 1997, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[6]  M. Boninger,et al.  Evaluation of a pushrim-activated, power-assisted wheelchair. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  R. Waters,et al.  Upper extremity pain in the postrehabilitation spinal cord injured patient. , 1992, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  P Engel,et al.  Technological and physiological characteristics of a newly developed hand-lever drive system for wheelchairs. , 1986, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[9]  M. Kolber,et al.  Shoulder pain in wheelchair users with tetraplegia and paraplegia. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  P J Nichols,et al.  Wheelchair user's shoulder? Shoulder pain in patients with spinal cord lesions. , 1979, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[11]  C B Sledge,et al.  The weight-bearing shoulder. The impingement syndrome in paraplegics. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  H E Veeger,et al.  Manual wheelchair propulsion: effects of power output on physiology and technique. , 1988, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[13]  R A Cooper,et al.  Shoulder imaging abnormalities in individuals with paraplegia. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[14]  H. Veeger,et al.  The effect of wheelchair handrim tube diameter on propulsion efficiency and force application (tube diameter and efficiency in wheelchairs). , 1996, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[15]  H E Veeger,et al.  Effect of handrim velocity on mechanical efficiency in wheelchair propulsion. , 1992, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[16]  S. D. Shimada,et al.  Wheelchair pushrim kinetics: body weight and median nerve function. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  D Veeger,et al.  Mechanical advantage in wheelchair lever propulsion: effect on physical strain and efficiency. , 1997, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[18]  J. Kinney,et al.  Energy Metabolism, Indirect Calorimetry, and Nutrition , 1989 .