Towards a quantitative academic internationalization assessment of Brazilian research groups

This paper introduces a new computational method to automatically estimate the International Publication Ratio (IPR) based on the analysis of bibliographical productions of Brazilian research groups, a task that would be too difficult (in many cases, impossible) to be performed manually. The proposed method explores the DOI number to identify the countries of every co-author who participated in each publication. Considering the bibliometric data from the Brazilian Lattes platform we show that is possible to make a good estimation of the IPR for research groups. Calculating the IPR is important in order to make a quantitative evaluation of the science progress and to establish a comparison between the academic institutions or knowledge areas. The experiments considering research groups, belonging to the 100 more collaborative researchers of five Brazilian major knowledge areas, confirm that the our proposal leads to an effective way to infer the IPR.

[1]  Rogério Mugnaini,et al.  A new indicator for international visibility: exploring Brazilian scientific community , 2011, Scientometrics.

[2]  Louisa Sadler Current issues in parsing technology , 2004, Machine Translation.

[3]  Jacqueline Leta,et al.  Recognition and international collaboration: the Brazilian case , 2002, Scientometrics.

[4]  Ki-Wan Kim,et al.  Measuring international research collaboration of peripheral countries: Taking the context into consideration , 2006, Scientometrics.

[5]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Science in Brazil. Part 2: Sectoral and institutional research profiles , 2006, Scientometrics.

[6]  Hai Zhuge,et al.  Discovery of knowledge flow in science , 2006, CACM.

[7]  Roberto Marcondes Cesar Junior,et al.  scriptLattes: an open-source knowledge extraction system from the Lattes platform , 2009, Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society.

[8]  Diana Hicks,et al.  How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model , 1997, Scientometrics.

[9]  N. Paskin Digital Object Identifier (DOI) System , 2010 .

[10]  Luka Kronegger,et al.  Co-authorship trends and collaboration patterns in the Slovenian sociological community , 2010 .

[11]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Detecting rich-club ordering in complex networks , 2006, physics/0602134.

[12]  Cristiane V. Amorin Organização do currículo: plataforma Lattes , 2003 .

[13]  Roberto Marcondes Cesar Junior,et al.  Towards Automatic Discovery of co-authorship Networks in the Brazilian Academic Areas , 2011, 2011 IEEE Seventh International Conference on e-Science Workshops.

[14]  Mathieu Bastian,et al.  Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks , 2009, ICWSM.

[15]  J. Knight Internationalization Remodeled: Definition, Approaches, and Rationales , 2004 .

[16]  Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al.  The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results , 1998, Scientometrics.

[17]  Cristiane V Amorin [Curriculum vitae organization: the Lattes software platform]. , 2003, Pesquisa odontologica brasileira = Brazilian oral research.

[18]  Edward M. Reingold,et al.  Graph drawing by force‐directed placement , 1991, Softw. Pract. Exp..

[19]  Aliya M. Rahman,et al.  Research in International Education , 2008 .

[20]  Peter Haddawy,et al.  Measuring international knowledge flows and scholarly impact of scientific research , 2012, Scientometrics.

[21]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Science in Brazil. Part 1: A macro-level comparative study , 2006, Scientometrics.