Optimization of TEOAE recording protocols: A linear protocol derived from parameters of a time-frequency analysis: a pilot study on neonatal subjects

Linear and non-linear TEOAE protocols were compared in terms of nine parameters in order to define the protocol producing recordings with the highest signal quality (lowest noise and highest signal-to-noise ratio). The pilot project acquired data using ILO-92 apparatus from 220 neonates (397 ears) at the second/third day after birth in three European laboratories. A Gabor spectrogram time-frequency representation of the recordings showed considerable frequency dispersion in TEOAE latencies >4.0 ms. The data, analysed with a Wilcoxon test, indicated that a linear TEOAE protocol: (i) generates recordings of a lower noise and a higher signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio in the 2.0, 3.0, 4.0 kHz TEOAE bands; (ii) the increase in the S/N ratio can result in a decrement of the required number of TEOAE sweeps; (iii) the higher values of S/N can be used in the estimation of more robust pass-fail criteria, minimizing the percentage of false positives and negatives.

[1]  Shie Qian,et al.  Discrete Gabor transform , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[2]  M. Downs,et al.  A guide to newborn and infant hearing screening programs. , 1967, Archives of otolaryngology.

[3]  James W. Hall,et al.  Handbook of Otoacoustic Emissions , 1999 .

[4]  D. Kemp,et al.  The Objective Assessment of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in Neonates , 1994, Ear and hearing.

[5]  D T Kemp,et al.  Acoustic emission cochleography--practical aspects. , 1986, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[6]  W. L. C. Rutten,et al.  Evoked acoustic emissions from within normal and abnormal human ears: Comparison with audiometric and electrocochleographic findings , 1980, Hearing Research.

[7]  A R Thornton,et al.  Technical aspects of recording evoked otoacoustic emissions using maximum length sequences. , 1994, Scandinavian audiology.

[8]  M. J. McCoy,et al.  Time‐Windowing of Click‐Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions to Increase Signal‐to‐Noise Ratio , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[9]  F Grandori,et al.  “Linear” and “Derived” Otoacoustic Emissions in Newborns: A Comparative Study , 2001, Ear and hearing.

[10]  Shie Qian,et al.  Decomposition of the Wigner-Ville distribution and time-frequency distribution series , 1994, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[11]  S J Norton,et al.  Characteristics of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children. , 1999, Ear and hearing.

[12]  J Cheng,et al.  Time-frequency analysis of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions via smoothed pseudo Wigner distribution. , 1995, Scandinavian audiology.

[13]  E. M. Burns,et al.  Incidence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in children and infants. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  L. Collet,et al.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in preterm neonates: prevalence and gender effects , 1995, Hearing Research.

[15]  E. Zwicker.  Delayed evoked oto-acoustic emissions and their suppression by Gaussian-shaped pressure impulses , 1983, Hearing Research.

[16]  D. Stapells,et al.  Frequency-specific identification of hearing loss using transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions to clicks and tones , 1996, Hearing Research.

[17]  B R Vohr,et al.  Referral rates and cost efficiency in a universal newborn hearing screening program using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. , 1995, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[18]  A R Thornton,et al.  High rate otoacoustic emissions. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  P. Ravazzani,et al.  'Derived nonlinear' versus 'linear' click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. , 1996, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[20]  M.L. Whitehead,et al.  Measurement of otoacoustic emissions for hearing assessment , 1994, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[21]  P. Bonfils,et al.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions: normative data and presbycusis. , 1988, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[22]  Confirmation of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions based on user-independent criteria. , 1994, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[23]  The occurrence of click-evoked oto-acoustic emissions ("Kemp echoes") in normal-hearing ears. , 1987, Scandinavian audiology.

[24]  The effect of posture on three objective audiological measures. , 1992, British journal of audiology.

[25]  R. Sisto,et al.  Linear and nonlinear transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans exposed to noise , 2002, Hearing Research.

[26]  P. Avan,et al.  Spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions in preterm neonates , 1992, The Laryngoscope.

[27]  G. K. Martin,et al.  Spontaneous, click-, and toneburst-evoked otoacoustic emissions from normal ears , 1986, Hearing Research.

[28]  W. Brownell,et al.  Fluorescence-Imaged Microdeformation of the Outer Hair Cell Lateral Wall , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  P. Hepper,et al.  Development of fetal hearing , 1994, Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition.

[30]  C. Elberling,et al.  Evoked acoustic emissions from the human ear. II. Normative data in young adults and influence of posture. , 1982, Scandinavian audiology.