Thematic Analysis

As qualitative research becomes increasingly recognized and valued, it is imperative that it is conducted in a rigorous and methodical manner to yield meaningful and useful results. To be accepted as trustworthy, qualitative researchers must demonstrate that data analysis has been conducted in a precise, consistent, and exhaustive manner through recording, systematizing, and disclosing the methods of analysis with enough detail to enable the reader to determine whether the process is credible. Although there are numerous examples of how to conduct qualitative research, few sophisticated tools are available to researchers for conducting a rigorous and relevant thematic analysis. The purpose of this article is to guide researchers using thematic analysis as a research method. We offer personal insights and practical examples, while exploring issues of rigor and trustworthiness. The process of conducting a thematic analysis is illustrated through the presentation of an auditable decision trail, guiding interpreting and representing textual data. We detail our step-by-step approach to exploring the effectiveness of strategic clinical networks in Alberta, Canada, in our mixed methods case study. This article contributes a purposeful approach to thematic analysis in order to systematize and increase the traceability and verification of the analysis.

[1]  P. Sainsbury,et al.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. , 2007, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[2]  Kathleen M. MacQueen,et al.  Applied Thematic Analysis , 2011 .

[3]  Jennifer Attride-Stirling Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research , 2001 .

[4]  P. Cronin,et al.  Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 1: quantitative research. , 2007, British journal of nursing.

[5]  S. Straus,et al.  Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map? , 2006, The Journal of continuing education in the health professions.

[6]  J Savage,et al.  One voice, different tunes: issues raised by dual analysis of a segment of qualitative data. , 2000, Journal of advanced nursing.

[7]  K. Malterud Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines , 2001, The Lancet.

[8]  J. Fereday,et al.  Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development , 2006 .

[9]  M. Leininger,et al.  Current Issues, Problems, and Trends to Advance Qualitative Paradigmatic Research Methods for the Future , 1992 .

[10]  Sue Ziebland,et al.  Analysing qualitative data , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  Gerard A Tobin,et al.  Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. , 2004, Journal of advanced nursing.

[12]  Henry T. Stelfox,et al.  How do stakeholders from multiple hierarchical levels of a large provincial health system define engagement? A qualitative study , 2017, Implementation Science.

[13]  M. Sandelowski Qualitative analysis: what it is and how to begin. , 1995, Research in nursing & health.

[14]  D. Ugarriza,et al.  The Concept of Theme as Used in Qualitative Nursing Research , 2000, Western journal of nursing research.

[15]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[16]  Margarete Sandelowski,et al.  Using Qualitative Research , 2004, Qualitative health research.

[17]  T. Koch,et al.  Establishing rigour in qualitative research: the decision trail. , 1994, Journal of advanced nursing.

[18]  Sarah J. Tracy Qualitative Quality: Eight “Big-Tent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research , 2010 .

[19]  H. Starks,et al.  Choose Your Method: A Comparison of Phenomenology, Discourse Analysis, and Grounded Theory , 2007, Qualitative health research.

[20]  E. Guba,et al.  Fourth Generation Evaluation , 1989 .

[21]  M. Sandelowski,et al.  The problem of rigor in qualitative research , 1986, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[22]  E. Guba,et al.  Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985, 416 pp., $25.00 (Cloth) , 1985 .

[23]  Tammy L. Rapp,et al.  Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future , 2008 .

[24]  S. Thorne Data analysis in qualitative research , 2000 .

[25]  Nelly D. Oelke,et al.  Management of a Large Qualitative Data Set: Establishing Trustworthiness of the Data , 2012 .

[26]  Anthony G. Tuckett,et al.  Applying thematic analysis theory to practice: A researcher’s experience , 2005, Contemporary nurse.

[27]  Luc Côté,et al.  Appraising qualitative research articles in medicine and medical education , 2005, Medical teacher.

[28]  I. Holloway,et al.  The Status of Method: Flexibility, Consistency and Coherence , 2003 .

[29]  H. McKenna,et al.  Establishing the credibility of qualitative research findings: the plot thickens. , 1999, Journal of advanced nursing.