A comparative study of energy consumption and physical properties of microfibrillated cellulose produced by different processing methods

Microfibrillated celluloses (MFCs) with diameters predominantly in the range of 10–100 nm liberated from larger plant-based fibers have garnered much attention for the use in composites, coatings, and films due to large specific surface areas, renewability, and unique mechanical properties. Energy consumption during production is an important aspect in the determination of the “green” nature of these MFC-based materials. Bleached and unbleached hardwood pulp samples were processed by homogenization, microfluidization, and micro-grinding, to determine the effect of processing on microfibril and film properties, relative to energy consumption. Processing with these different methods affected the specific surface area of the MFCs, and the film characteristics such as opacity, roughness, density, water interaction properties, and tensile properties. Apparent film densities were approximately 900 kg/m3 for all samples and the specific surface area of the processed materials ranged from approximately 30 to 70 m2/g for bleached hardwood and 50 to 110 m2/g for unbleached hardwood. The microfluidizer resulted in films with higher tensile indices than both micro-grinding and homogenization (148 Nm/g vs. 105 Nm/g and 109 Nm/g, respectively for unbleached hardwood). Microfluidization and micro-grinding resulted in films with higher toughness values than homogenization and required less energy to obtain these properties, offering promise for producing MFC materials with lower energy input. It was also determined that a refining pretreatment required for microfluidization or homogenization can be reduced or eliminated when producing MFCs with the micro-grinder. A summary of the fiber and mechanical energy costs for different fibers and processing conditions with economic potential is presented.

[1]  David Plackett,et al.  Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review , 2010 .

[2]  M. Samejima,et al.  Relationship between the Physical Properties and Surface Area of Cellulose Derived from Adsorbates of Various Molecular Sizes. , 1998, Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry.

[3]  Ayan Chakraborty,et al.  Cellulose microfibrils: A novel method of preparation using high shear refining and cryocrushing , 2005 .

[4]  Marielle Henriksson,et al.  Cellulose nanopaper structures of high toughness. , 2008, Biomacromolecules.

[5]  G. Chinga-Carrasco,et al.  Computer-assisted quantification of the multi-scale structure of films made of nanofibrillated cellulose , 2010 .

[6]  Tom Lindström,et al.  Method for the manufacturing of microfibrilated cellulose , 2006 .

[7]  M. Vignon,et al.  Topochemistry of carboxylated cellulose nanocrystals resulting from TEMPO-mediated oxidation , 2005 .

[8]  Akira Isogai,et al.  Cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. , 2007, Biomacromolecules.

[9]  Hiroyuki Yano,et al.  The effect of morphological changes from pulp fiber towards nano-scale fibrillated cellulose on the mechanical properties of high-strength plant fiber based composites , 2004 .

[10]  P. Stenius,et al.  Water‐in‐oil Emulsions Stabilized by Hydrophobized Microfibrillated Cellulose , 2007 .

[11]  Hiroyuki Yano,et al.  Novel high-strength biocomposites based on microfibrillated cellulose having nano-order-unit web-like network structure , 2005 .

[12]  Mohini Sain,et al.  ISOLATION OF CELLULOSE MICROFIBRILS – AN ENZYMATIC APPROACH , 2006 .

[13]  Leena‐Sisko Johansson,et al.  Properties and characterization of hydrophobized microfibrillated cellulose , 2006 .

[14]  H. Yano,et al.  Obtaining cellulose nanofibers with a uniform width of 15 nm from wood. , 2007, Biomacromolecules.

[15]  Kristin Syverud,et al.  Strength and barrier properties of MFC films , 2009 .

[16]  Per Stenstad,et al.  Chemical surface modifications of microfibrillated cellulose , 2008 .

[17]  M. Nogi,et al.  Optically transparent composites reinforced with plant fiber-based nanofibers , 2005 .

[18]  R. Venditti,et al.  The effect of chemical composition on microfibrillar cellulose films from wood pulps: mechanical processing and physical properties. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[19]  Kristin Syverud,et al.  The use of microfibrillated cellulose produced from kraft pulp as strength enhancer in TMP paper , 2008 .

[20]  K. R. Sandberg,et al.  Microfibrillated cellulose, a new cellulose product: properties, uses, and commercial potential , 1983 .

[21]  Gunnar Henriksson,et al.  An environmentally friendly method for enzyme-assisted preparation of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) nanofibers , 2007 .

[22]  W. Winter,et al.  Alpha-chitin nanocrystals prepared from shrimp shells and their specific surface area measurement. , 2007, Biomacromolecules.

[23]  J. Hamilton,et al.  Microfibrillated cellulose: morphology and accessibility , 1983 .

[24]  Richard A. Venditti,et al.  The effect of chemical composition on microfibrillar cellulose films from wood pulps: water interactions and physical properties for packaging applications , 2010 .

[25]  Takashi Taniguchi,et al.  New films produced from microfibrillated natural fibres , 1998 .