Dynamic DNA devices and assemblies formed by shape-complementary, non–base pairing 3D components

Reconfigurable DNA structures DNA origami—nanostructures created by programming the assembly of single-stranded DNA through base pairing—can create intricate structures. However, such structures lack the flexible and reversible interactions more typical of biomolecular recognition. Gerling et al. created three-dimensional DNA nanostructures that assemble though nucleotide base-stacking interactions (see the Perspective by Shih). These structures cycled from open to closed states with changes in salt concentration or temperature. Science, this issue p. 1446; see also p. 1417 Readily reconfigurable DNA structures can be made that do not need detailed strand sequences to connect components. [Also see Perspective by Shih] We demonstrate that discrete three-dimensional (3D) DNA components can specifically self-assemble in solution on the basis of shape-complementarity and without base pairing. Using this principle, we produced homo- and heteromultimeric objects, including micrometer-scale one- and two-stranded filaments and lattices, as well as reconfigurable devices, including an actuator, a switchable gear, an unfoldable nanobook, and a nanorobot. These multidomain assemblies were stabilized via short-ranged nucleobase stacking bonds that compete against electrostatic repulsion between the components’ interfaces. Using imaging by electron microscopy, ensemble and single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer spectroscopy, and electrophoretic mobility analysis, we show that the balance between attractive and repulsive interactions, and thus the conformation of the assemblies, may be finely controlled by global parameters such as cation concentration or temperature and by an allosteric mechanism based on strand-displacement reactions.

[1]  I. Willner,et al.  From cascaded catalytic nucleic acids to enzyme-DNA nanostructures: controlling reactivity, sensing, logic operations, and assembly of complex structures. , 2014, Chemical reviews.

[2]  Joseph M. Schaeffer,et al.  On the biophysics and kinetics of toehold-mediated DNA strand displacement , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[3]  T. G. Martin,et al.  Rapid Folding of DNA into Nanoscale Shapes at Constant Temperature , 2012, Science.

[4]  Felix J. B. Bäuerlein,et al.  Focused ion beam micromachining of eukaryotic cells for cryoelectron tomography , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Jonathan Bath,et al.  A DNA-based molecular motor that can navigate a network of tracks. , 2012, Nature nanotechnology.

[6]  P. Rothemund,et al.  Programmable molecular recognition based on the geometry of DNA nanostructures. , 2011, Nature chemistry.

[7]  Jehoshua Bruck,et al.  Neural network computation with DNA strand displacement cascades , 2011, Nature.

[8]  Friedrich C Simmel,et al.  Nucleic acid based molecular devices. , 2011, Angewandte Chemie.

[9]  Tao Pan,et al.  Structure of a bacterial ribonuclease P holoenzyme in complex with tRNA , 2010, Nature.

[10]  N. Seeman,et al.  Blunt-ended DNA stacking interactions in a 3-helix motif. , 2010, Chemical communications.

[11]  Erik Winfree,et al.  Molecular robots guided by prescriptive landscapes , 2010, Nature.

[12]  H. Sugiyama,et al.  Programmed-assembly system using DNA jigsaw pieces. , 2010, Chemistry.

[13]  Shawn M. Douglas,et al.  Multilayer DNA origami packed on a square lattice. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[14]  Shawn M. Douglas,et al.  Folding DNA into Twisted and Curved Nanoscale Shapes , 2009, Science.

[15]  C. Fierke,et al.  Conformational change in the Bacillus subtilis RNase P holoenzyme--pre-tRNA complex enhances substrate affinity and limits cleavage rate. , 2009, RNA.

[16]  Adam H. Marblestone,et al.  Rapid prototyping of 3D DNA-origami shapes with caDNAno , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  J. Kjems,et al.  Self-assembly of a nanoscale DNA box with a controllable lid , 2009, Nature.

[18]  Shawn M. Douglas,et al.  Self-assembly of DNA into nanoscale three-dimensional shapes , 2009, Nature.

[19]  A. Kapanidis,et al.  Red light, green light: probing single molecules using alternating-laser excitation. , 2008, Biochemical Society transactions.

[20]  Rahul Roy,et al.  A practical guide to single-molecule FRET , 2008, Nature Methods.

[21]  J. Janin,et al.  Protein–protein interaction and quaternary structure , 2008, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[22]  Russell P. Goodman,et al.  Reconfigurable, braced, three-dimensional DNA nanostructures. , 2008, Nature nanotechnology.

[23]  D. Y. Zhang,et al.  Engineering Entropy-Driven Reactions and Networks Catalyzed by DNA , 2007, Science.

[24]  José María Carazo,et al.  Modeling experimental image formation for likelihood-based classification of electron microscopy data. , 2007, Structure.

[25]  Wen Jiang,et al.  EMAN2: an extensible image processing suite for electron microscopy. , 2007, Journal of structural biology.

[26]  P. Rothemund Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns , 2006, Nature.

[27]  Conrad C. Huang,et al.  UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[28]  A. Turberfield,et al.  A DNA-fuelled molecular machine made of DNA , 2022 .

[29]  S. Jones,et al.  Principles of protein-protein interactions. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  N. Seeman,et al.  DNA double-crossover molecules. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[31]  Influence of metal ions on the ribonuclease P reaction. Distinguishing substrate binding from catalysis. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[32]  N. Pace,et al.  The RNA moiety of ribonuclease P is the catalytic subunit of the enzyme , 1983, Cell.

[33]  N. Seeman Nucleic acid junctions and lattices. , 1982, Journal of theoretical biology.