How global is R&D? Firm-level determinants of home-country bias in R&D

Despite an increasing internationalization of R&D activities by multinational firms, a major portion of corporate R&D still tends to be concentrated in firms’ home countries. We examine the extent to which there exists a home-country bias in the location of R&D activities of 156 major R&D-intensive firms based in Europe, the United States, and Japan during 1995–2002, and develop hypotheses concerning the firm-level determinants of such home-country bias. We define this bias as a share of global R&D activities conducted in the home country that is not proportional to the general attractiveness of the country for multinational firms’ R&D activities. We find home bias to be the predominant pattern, but with substantial variation among firms. The extent of the bias increases with the degree of scale and scope economies in R&D, the coordination costs of international R&D, and the embeddedness of firms’ R&D in home countries’ innovation systems. Technology leadership is associated with greater home bias if the home country provides relatively strong intellectual property rights protection, and firms face potential knowledge dissipation abroad. Our findings imply that home-country bias is, to an important extent, a response to the economics of R&D and the centripetal forces favoring centralization of R&D.

[1]  Aya S Chacar,et al.  ORGANIZING FOR TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION IN THE U.S. PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY , 2003 .

[2]  Hariolf Grupp,et al.  Commuters and the regional assignment of innovative activities: A methodological patent study of German districts , 2005 .

[3]  Richard Florida,et al.  The globalization of R&D: Results of a survey of foreign-affiliated R&D laboratories in the USA , 1997 .

[4]  R. Belderbos,et al.  Intellectual assets and international investment : a stocktaking of the evidence , 2007 .

[5]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[6]  Conferencia de las Naciones Unidas sobre Comercio y Desarrollo,et al.  World Investment Report 2013 , 2013 .

[7]  P. Athukorala,et al.  Working Papers in Trade and Development Globalization of R&D by US-based Multinational Enterprises , 2009 .

[8]  Massimo Riccaboni,et al.  Networks of innovators within and across borders. Evidence from patent data , 2013 .

[9]  John Cantwell,et al.  MNE competence‐creating subsidiary mandates , 2005 .

[10]  T. Allen.  Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[11]  R. Gulati,et al.  STRATEGIC NETWORKS , 2000 .

[12]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions , 2001 .

[13]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[14]  K. Zhou,et al.  Relational mechanisms, formal contracts, and local knowledge acquisition by international subsidiaries , 2009 .

[15]  K. Clark,et al.  Creating project plans to focus product development. , 1992, Harvard business review.

[16]  Juan Alcácer,et al.  Location Strategies and Knowledge Spillovers , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[17]  R. Caves,et al.  Research and Transfer of Technology by Multinational Enterprises , 2009 .

[18]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Location, Decentralization, and Knowledge Sources for Innovation , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[19]  O. Gassmann,et al.  Market versus technology drive in R&D internationalization: four different patterns of managing research and development , 2002 .

[20]  Gary Hewitt,et al.  Research and Development Performed Abroad by U.S. Manufacturing Multinationals , 1980 .

[21]  H. Wolf,et al.  Intranational Home Bias in Trade , 2000, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[22]  Antonello Zanfei.  Transnational Firms and the Changing Organisation of Innovative Activities , 2000 .

[23]  J. Cantwell,et al.  Recent Location of Foreign-owned Research and Development Activities by Large Multinational Corporations in the European Regions: The Role of Spillovers and Externalities , 2005 .

[24]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Here or There? A Survey of Factors in Multinational R&D Location: Report to the Government/University/Industry Research Roundtable , 2006 .

[25]  S. Hymer.  Multinational Corporation and International Oligopoly: The Non-American Challenge , 1969 .

[26]  K. Green.  National innovation systems: a comparative analysis , 1996 .

[27]  A. Arundel,et al.  What percentage of innovations are patented? empirical estimates for European firms , 1998 .

[28]  María Jesús Nieto,et al.  Offshoring of R&D: Looking abroad to improve innovation performance , 2011 .

[29]  Minyuan Zhao,et al.  Doing R & D in Countries with Weak IPR Protection : Can Corporate Management Substitute for Legal Institutions ? , 2004 .

[30]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[31]  Geoffrey Owen,et al.  Knowledge and Competitive Advantage: The Co‐evolution of Firms, Technology and National Institutions , 2005 .

[32]  C. Freeman.  Technology, policy, and economic performance , 1987 .

[33]  Hiroyuki Odagiri,et al.  Overseas R&D, knowledge sourcing, and patenting: an empirical study of Japanese R&D investment in the US , 2004 .

[34]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[35]  N. Driffield,et al.  The multinational enterprise as a source of international knowledge flows: Direct evidence from Italy , 2010 .

[36]  Rachel Griffith,et al.  How Special is the Special Relationship? Using the Impact of Us R&D Spillovers on UK Firms as a Test of Technology Sourcing , 2004 .

[37]  Fredrick Flyer,et al.  Agglomeration economies, firm heterogeneity, and foreign direct investment in the United States , 2000 .

[38]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  Foreign subsidiaries as a channel of international technology diffusion: Some direct firm level evidence from Belgium , 2004 .

[39]  C. Annique Un,et al.  Why some firms never invest in formal R&D , 2010 .

[40]  K. Lewis,et al.  Trying to Explain Home Bias in Equities and Consumption , 1999 .

[41]  M. Wilkins,et al.  International Big Business 1957-1967. A Study of Comparative Growth , 1971 .

[42]  Rajneesh Narula,et al.  Innovation systems and ‘inertia’ in R&D location: Norwegian firms and the role of systemic lock-in , 2002 .

[43]  Jan Hendrik Fisch,et al.  Optimal dispersion of R&D activities in multinational corporations with a genetic algorithm , 2003 .

[44]  Y. Todo,et al.  What determines overseas R&D activities? The case of Japanese multinational firms , 2008 .

[45]  Rene Belderbos,et al.  Entry Mode, Organizational Learning and R&D in Foreign Affiliates: Evidence from japanese Firms , 2003 .

[46]  Colin Webb,et al.  Analysing European and International Patent Citations , 2005 .

[47]  Pier Paolo Saviotti,et al.  Coherence of the Knowledge Base and the Firm's Innovative Performance: Evidence from the U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry , 2005 .

[48]  Z. Griliches.  Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[49]  S. Hall,et al.  Leaders, Laggards and the Pursuit of Foreign Knowledge , 2004 .

[50]  Kyoji Fukao,et al.  Foreign and domestic R&D investment , 2009 .

[51]  S. Lenway,et al.  Knowledge and competitive advantage, the coevolution of firms, technology and national institutions , 2003 .

[52]  Does Inward Foreign Direct Investment Boost the Productivity of Domestic Firms? , 2002 .

[53]  David P. McCaffrey,et al.  Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. , 1995 .

[54]  Bruno Van Pottelsberghe,et al.  The economics of the european patent system , 2007 .

[55]  J. Cantwell.  The Globalisation of Technology: What Remains of the Product Cycle Model? , 1995 .

[56]  Anupama Phene,et al.  Innovation in multinational subsidiaries: The role of knowledge assimilation and subsidiary capabilities , 2008 .

[57]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge spillovers and the assignment of R&D responsibilities to foreign subsidiaries , 2004 .

[58]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  Emergence of a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations , 1996 .

[59]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[60]  G. Santangelo.  The tension of information sharing: Effects on subsidiary embeddedness , 2012 .

[61]  W Kuemmerle,et al.  Building effective R&D capabilities abroad. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[62]  J. Cantwell.  Location and the multinational enterprise , 2009 .

[63]  Natalie Chen,et al.  Intra-National Versus International Trade in the European Union: Why Do National Borders Matter? , 2002 .

[64]  Tina C. Ambos,et al.  Meeting the Challenge of Offshoring R&D: An Examination of Firm- and Location-Specific Factors , 2011 .

[65]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Small firms and entrepreneurship : an East-West perspective , 1994 .

[66]  Keith Hayward,et al.  The internationalisation of research and development by multinational enterprises , 1990 .

[67]  Dominique Guellec,et al.  From R&D to Productivity Growth: Do the Institutional Settings and the Source of Funds of R&D Matter? , 2004 .

[68]  Y. Todo,et al.  Overseas R&D Activities and Home Productivity Growth: Evidence from Japanese Firm-Level Data , 2008 .

[69]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Scale, scope, and spillovers: the determinants of research productivity in drug discovery. , 1996, The Rand journal of economics.

[70]  Katarina Blomkvist,et al.  Quo vadis? The entry into new technologies in advanced foreign subsidiaries of the multinational enterprise , 2010 .

[71]  R. Veugelers,et al.  Strategic R&D Location in European Manufacturing Industries , 2006 .

[72]  B. Dalum.  National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning , 1992 .

[73]  Jaeyong Song,et al.  What determines knowledge sourcing from host locations of overseas R&D operations?: A study of global R&D activities of Japanese multinationals , 2011 .

[74]  Wilbur Chung,et al.  International knowledge sourcing: evidence from U.S. firms expanding abroad , 2008 .

[75]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Characterizing the “technological position” of firms, with application to quantifying technological opportunity and research spillovers☆ , 1989 .

[76]  B. V. Pottelsberghe.  Hot ‘Patent’ Issues: Quantitative Evidence , 2007 .

[77]  Tony S. Frost,et al.  R&D co-practice and ‘reverse’ knowledge integration in multinational firms , 2005 .

[78]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge flows within multinational corporations , 2000 .

[79]  Brent B. Allred,et al.  Patent rights and innovative activity: evidence from national and firm-level data , 2007 .

[80]  Juan Alcácer,et al.  Knowledge Seeking and Location Choice of Foreign Direct Investment in the United States , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[81]  Jasjit Singh.  Distributed R&D, Cross-Regional Knowledge Integration and Quality of Innovative Output , 2006 .

[82]  M. Bell,et al.  The local/global integration of MNC subsidiaries and their technological behaviour: Argentina in the late 1990s , 2010 .

[83]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[84]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Innovation Policy in a Global Economy: Global corporations and national systems of innovation: who dominates whom? , 1999 .

[85]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  THE NBER/SLOAN PROJECT ON INDUSTRIAL TECHAIOLOGY AND PRODUCTIVITY: INCORPORATING LEARNING FROM PLANT VISITS AND INTERVIEWS INTO ECONOMIC RESEARCHt Knowledge Spillovers and Patent Citations: Evidence from a Survey of Inventors , 2000 .

[86]  R. Rogers.  The minimum optimal steel plant and the survivor technique of cost estimation , 1993 .

[87]  A. Arora,et al.  The Organization of R&D in American Corporations: The Determinants and Consequences of Decentralization , 2011 .

[88]  Bruce Kogut,et al.  Country capabilities and the permeability of borders , 1991 .

[89]  F. Kodama.  Technology fusion and the new R & D: Harvard Business Review, 70 (4), 70–78 (July/August 1992) , 1993 .

[90]  N. Lahiri.  Geographic Distribution of R&D Activity: How Does it Affect Innovation Quality? , 2010 .

[91]  Raymond Vernon,et al.  The Product Cycle Hypothesis in a New International Environment , 2009 .

[92]  J. Shaver,et al.  Does international research and development increase patent output? An analysis of Japanese pharmaceutical firms , 2005 .

[93]  Minyuan Zhao,et al.  Local R&D Strategies and Multilocation Firms: The Role of Internal Linkages , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[94]  A. Perrino,et al.  Global management of technology: A study of 16 multinationals in the USA Europe and Japan , 1991 .

[95]  Bart van Looy,et al.  Technological Diversification, Coherence and Performance of Firms , 2007 .

[96]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Sloan School of Management Working Paper Factors That Influence Technical Communication in Distributed Product Development: an Empirical Study in the Telecommunications Industry Factors That Influence Technical Communication in Distributed Product Development: an Empirical Study in the Telecommunica , 2022 .

[97]  A. Rugman.  Research and Development by Multinational and Domestic Firms in Canada , 1981 .

[98]  Robert Pearce,et al.  Decentralised R&D and strategic competitiveness: globalised approaches to generation and use of technology in multinational enterprises (MNEs) , 1999 .

[99]  Jeffrey L. Furman.  LOCATION AND ORGANIZING STRATEGY: EXPLORING THE INFLUENCE OF LOCATION ON THE ORGANIZATION OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH , 2003 .

[100]  R. Gulati,et al.  Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue: strategic networks , 2000 .

[101]  J. Howells,et al.  Going global: The use of ICT networks in research and development☆ , 1995 .

[102]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Large Firms in the Production of the World's Technology: An Important Case of “Non-Globalisation” , 1991 .

[103]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[104]  Arnoud Cyriel Leo,et al.  Tech Talk: How managers are stimulating global R&D communication , 1991 .

[105]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[106]  A. Jaffe.  Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[107]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Does it matter where patent citations come from? Inventor versus examiner citations in European patents , 2005 .

[108]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Scale, Scope and Spillovers: The Determinants of Research Productivity in Ethical Drug Discovery , 2015 .

[109]  Lilian Ng,et al.  Home bias in foreign investment decisions , 2010 .

[110]  K. Sauvant.  World Investment Report , 1999 .

[111]  Megan MacGarvie,et al.  How well do patent citations measure flows of technology? Evidence from French innovation surveys , 2005 .

[112]  Robert Nobel,et al.  Foreign research and development in Swedish multinationals , 1993 .

[113]  Ulf R. Andersson,et al.  Managing subsidiary knowledge creation: The effect of control mechanisms on subsidiary local embeddedness , 2005 .

[114]  B. Silverman,et al.  R&D, ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE, AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF CORPORATE TECHNOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE , 2004 .

[115]  Jaeyong Song,et al.  The paradox of technological capabilities: a study of knowledge sourcing from host countries of overseas R&D operations , 2008 .

[116]  P. Criscuolo.  Inter-firm reverse technology transfer: the home country effect of R&D internationalization , 2009 .

[117]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  No place like home? The embeddedness of innovation in a regional economy , 2000 .

[118]  M. Slaughter,et al.  Boost the Productivity of Domestic Firms ? , 2002 .

[119]  J. Cantwell,et al.  Physical attraction and the geography of knowledge sourcing in multinational enterprises , 2011 .

[120]  Lee G. Branstetter,et al.  Do Stronger Intellectual Property Rights Increase International Technology Transfer? Empirical Evidence from U.S. Firm-Level Panel Data , 2004 .

[121]  R. Pouder,et al.  Hot Spots and Blind Spots: Geographical Clusters of Firms and Innovation , 1996 .

[122]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[123]  Walter Kuemmerle,et al.  Optimal scale for research and development in foreign environments—an investigation into size and performance of research and development laboratories abroad , 1998 .

[124]  Björn Ambos.  Foreign direct investment in industrial research and development: A study of German MNCs , 2005 .

[125]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Science as a Map in Technological Search , 2000 .

[126]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  INNOVATION IN MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS: CONTROL AND COMMUNICATION PATTERNS IN INTERNATIONAL R&D OPERATIONS , 1998 .

[127]  Nicholas Argyres.  CAPABILITIES, TECHNOLOGICAL DIVERSIFICATION AND DIVISIONALIZATION , 1996 .

[128]  Tony S. Frost.  The geographic sources of foreign subsidiaries' innovations , 2001 .

[129]  Mattia Bianchi,et al.  Safe nests in global nets: Internationalization and appropriability of R&D in wireless telecom , 2011 .