Scaling the spatial distribution of photosynthesis from leaf to canopy in a plant growth chamber

Abstract The aim of this study was to quantify the spatial distribution of the net photosynthesis of a multi-layer crop. A multi-layer model (FORUG) was used to simulate the crop photosynthesis of tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) in the three-dimensional space inside a plant growth chamber. The model inputs were, on the one hand photosynthetic characteristics (maximal photosynthetic rate, quantum efficiency and respiration rate) determined at leaf level, and the microclimatic data on the other hand. Scaling-up to the level of the crop was done, taking into account the spatial distribution of leaf area index (LAI), leaf angle (or extinction coefficient), air temperature and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR). The simulated output was the net carbon exchange at a specific time step or the cumulative net carbon exchange over a specific period of time. Inside the test chamber spatial temperature differences ranged from 22.4 up to 32.9 °C at an inlet temperature of 22 °C and the lights on. Light intensity decreased gradually within the crop, resulting in very low light intensities at the bottom layers of the climate chamber. This resulted in the observation that the respiration rate was not compensated at low light intensities. The simulated photosynthesis of the 32 ‘cells’ of the test chamber ranged from −1.12 up to 5.94 μmol CO 2 m −2 s −1 . From a sensitivity analysis of the model at low (20% of maximum) and high (80% of maximum) light intensities, it was concluded that the spatial distribution of light, air temperature and LAI should be well known, just as the parameters describing the light response of the photosynthesis process. Moreover, this spatial distribution should be accurately taken into account.

[1]  A. Friend PGEN: an integrated model of leaf photosynthesis, transpiration, and conductance , 1995 .

[2]  J. M. A. Lenihan,et al.  Biological Environment , 1979 .

[3]  Raupach,et al.  Single layer models of evaporation from plant canopies are incorrect but useful, whereas multilayer models are correct but useless: discuss , 1988 .

[4]  J. D. Hanson,et al.  Analytical solution of the rectangular hyperbola for estimating daily net photosynthesis , 1991 .

[5]  Scaling leaf photosynthesis to canopy in a mixed deciduous forest, II: a simulation study for two grouwing seasons , 1997 .

[6]  Y. Hashimoto RECENT STRATEGIES OF OPTIMAL GROWTH REGULATION BY THE SPEAKING PLANT CONCEPT , 1989 .

[7]  J. Goudriaan,et al.  SEPARATING THE DIFFUSE AND DIRECT COMPONENT OF GLOBAL RADIATION AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR MODELING CANOPY PHOTOSYNTHESIS PART I. COMPONENTS OF INCOMING RADIATION , 1986 .

[8]  Hervé Sinoquet,et al.  Modeling radiative transfer in mixed and row intercropping systems , 1992 .

[9]  Kai-yun Wang Canopy CO2 exchange of Scots pine and its seasonal variation after four-year exposure to elevated CO2 and temperature , 1996 .

[10]  H. Sinoquet,et al.  Spatial distribution of leaf dry weight per area and leaf nitrogen concentration in relation to local radiation regime within an isolated tree crown. , 1999, Tree physiology.

[11]  N. J. Rosenberg,et al.  Microclimate: The Biological Environment. , 1976 .

[12]  S. Kellomäki,et al.  Effects of needle age, long-term temperature and CO(2) treatments on the photosynthesis of Scots pine. , 1995, Tree physiology.

[13]  Daniel Berckmans,et al.  Modeling dynamic behavior of leaf temperature at three-dimensional positions to step variations in air temperature and light. , 2000 .

[14]  C.J.T. Spitters,et al.  Separating the diffuse and direct component of global radiation and its implications for modeling canopy photosynthesis Part II. Calculation of canopy photosynthesis , 1986 .

[15]  J. H. M. Thornley,et al.  Mathematical models in plant physiology : a quantitative approach to problems in plant and crop physiology , 1976 .

[16]  R. Samson,et al.  Scaling leaf photosynthesis to canopy in a mixed deciduous forest. I. model description , 1997 .

[17]  Ulrike Tappeiner,et al.  Model simulation of spatial distribution of photosynthesis in structurally differing plant communities in the Central Caucasus , 1998 .

[18]  Daniel Berckmans,et al.  Quality of modelling plant responses for environment control purposes , 1999 .

[19]  Bruno Andrieu,et al.  The nested radiosity model for the distribution of light within plant canopies , 1998 .

[20]  D. Pury,et al.  Simple scaling of photosynthesis from leaves to canopies without the errors of big‐leaf models , 1997 .