Variation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions with furosemide injection

Cochlear function was monitored in adult gerbils using distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) during intraperitoneal injection of furosemide. All stimulus parameters were varied independently over a wide range, the stimulus frequencies f1 and f2 from 1 to 16 kHz, and the stimulus levels L1 and L2 from 20 to 80 dB SPL. The observed emissions at 2f1-f2 and 3f1-2f2 could be considered to be made up of two distinct components: (1) an 'active' source which depended in a complex way on the stimulus frequencies and levels, which was dominant at low and moderate stimulus levels, and which, by definition, was eliminated by sufficient furosemide intoxication; and (2) a 'passive' source which was essentially the same at all frequencies, with a level dependence given approximately by a simple power law distribution. The change from the active to the passive source was usually accompanied by an abrupt shift in emission phase angle. A simple summation model was shown to account for the observed form of this transition. The amount of the decrease in 2f1-f2 emission amplitude after furosemide injection was approximately independent of frequency and consistent for the middle frequency ratios and intensity levels (f2/f1 approximately equal to 1.3, L1 x L2 approximately equal to 55 x 50 dB SPL). It was concluded that the combination of DPOAE with furosemide injection can usefully be employed as a probe of active cochlear mechanics.

[1]  G. Rebillard,et al.  Cochlear origin of 2ƒ1−ƒ2 distortion products assessed by using 2 types of mutant mice , 1991, Hearing Research.

[2]  D O Kim,et al.  Cochlear mechanics: nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nerve-fiber responses and in ear-canal sound pressure. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  P. Dallos The active cochlea , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  S J Norton,et al.  Vulnerability and adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions to endocochlear potential variation. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  A. Forge,et al.  Ultrastructural and electrophysiological studies of acute ototoxic effects of furosemide. , 1982, British journal of audiology.

[6]  William F. Sewell,et al.  The effects of furosemide on the endocochlear potential and auditory-nerve fiber tuning curves in cats , 1984, Hearing Research.

[7]  R. A. Schmiedt Acoustic distortion in the ear canal. I. Cubic difference tones: effects of acute noise injury. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  E. Evans,et al.  The effects of intracochlear and systemic furosemide on the properties of single cochlear nerve fibres in the cat , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  A. M. Brown,et al.  The behavior of the acoustic distortion product, 2f1-f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  J. Allen,et al.  A second cochlear-frequency map that correlates distortion product and neural tuning measurements. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  A. Forge,et al.  Acoustic distortion products can be used to monitor the effects of chronic gentamicin treatment , 1989, Hearing Research.

[12]  D. Mountain,et al.  Haircell forward and reverse transduction: Differential suppression and enhancement , 1990, Hearing Research.

[13]  A. M. Brown,et al.  Acoustic distortion from rodent ears: A comparison of responses from rats, guinea pigs and gerbils , 1987, Hearing Research.

[14]  Glen K. Martin,et al.  Distortion Product Emissions in Humans , 1990, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[15]  P. Avan,et al.  Hypothetical roles of middle ear muscles in the guinea-pig , 1992, Hearing Research.

[16]  David T. Kemp,et al.  Ear canal acoustic and round window electrical correlates of 2f 1- f 2 distortion generated in the cochlea , 1984, Hearing Research.

[17]  Joe C. Adams,et al.  Stimulated acoustic emissions in the ear canal of the gerbil , 1981, Hearing Research.

[18]  B. Lonsbury-Martin,et al.  Altered susceptibility of 2f 1—f 2 acoustic-distortion products to the effects of repeated noise exposure in rabbits , 1991, Hearing Research.

[19]  I. Thalmann,et al.  Effect of Ethacrynic Acid, Furosemide, and Ouabain Upon the Endolymphatic Potential and Upon High Energy Phosphates of the Stria Vascularis , 1978, The Laryngoscope.

[20]  J. Allen,et al.  Using acoustic distortion products to measure the cochlear amplifier gain on the basilar membrane. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  B L Lonsbury-Martin,et al.  Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit: I. Differential dependence on stimulus parameters. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  B L Lonsbury-Martin,et al.  Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit. II: Differential physiological vulnerability. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  J. Ashmore A fast motile response in guinea‐pig outer hair cells: the cellular basis of the cochlear amplifier. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  G. K. Martin,et al.  Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. II. Sites of origin revealed by suppression contours and pure-tone exposures , 1987, Hearing Research.

[25]  M. Whitehead,et al.  Actively and Passively Generated Acoustic Distortion at 2f1-f2 in Rabbits , 1990 .

[26]  A. M. Brown,et al.  Can basilar membrane tuning be inferred from distortion measurement , 1990 .

[27]  Edwin W. Rubel,et al.  ACTIVE AND PASSIVE ADP COMPONENTS IN MAMMALIAN AND AVIAN EARS , 1990 .

[28]  R Probst,et al.  A review of otoacoustic emissions. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  J. Puel,et al.  Development of 2ƒ1−ƒ2 otoacoustic emissions in the rat , 1987, Hearing Research.

[30]  M. Ruggero,et al.  Furosemide alters organ of corti mechanics: evidence for feedback of outer hair cells upon the basilar membrane , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[31]  M. Lenoir,et al.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in hearing-impaired mutant mice. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  E. Rubel,et al.  Development of otoacoustic emissions in gerbil: Evidence for micromechanical changes underlying development of the place code , 1991, Hearing Research.

[33]  B. Lonsbury-Martin,et al.  Evidence for the influence of aging on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  B. Lonsbury-Martin,et al.  Postnatal development of 2ƒ1−ƒ2 otoacoustic emissions in pigmented rat , 1990, Hearing Research.

[35]  B. Lonsbury-Martin,et al.  Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. I. Basic features and physiological vulnerability , 1987, Hearing Research.