Do teams need both hands? An analysis of team process ambidexterity and the enabling role of information technology

Abstract As a core organizational resource, business processes are vital for organizational teams. To deal with today’s volatile business environment, organizations need to be ambidextrous in terms of process capabilities. However, little is known about how process ambidexterity, process standardization, and process agility, are enabled by information technology (IT) and related to team-level activities. To fill this gap in the literature, we conducted a field study based on 160 teams of 1081 individuals from seven companies in South Korea. Our results show that IT enables both process standardization and agility, and that a team’s process ambidexterity has a positive effect on inter-team coordination and team innovation, which in turn have a direct impact on team performance. Our findings highlight the importance of process ambidexterity by investigating the enabling role of IT and its outcomes in a team. Our results offer theoretical and practical implications from the perspective of team process ambidexterity.

[1]  Tim Weitzel,et al.  The performance impact of business process standardization: An empirical evaluation of the recruitment process , 2010, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[2]  Sushil,et al.  Evaluating the Practices of Flexibility Maturity for the Software Product and Service Organizations , 2020, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[3]  S. Athey,et al.  Product and Process Flexibility in an Innovative Environment , 1995 .

[4]  Qing Hu,et al.  Assimilation of Enterprise Systems: The Effect of Institutional Pressures and the Mediating Role of Top Management , 2007, MIS Q..

[5]  N. Anderson,et al.  Innovation and Creativity in Organizations , 2014 .

[6]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Direct and configurational paths of absorptive capacity and organizational innovation to successful organizational performance , 2016 .

[7]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[8]  Jos van Hillegersberg,et al.  Change factors requiring agility and implications for IT , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Developing information processing capability for operational agility: implications from a Chinese manufacturer , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Shiau-Yun Lu,et al.  Innovation and technology creation effects on organizational performance , 2016 .

[11]  Jing Zhao,et al.  The influence of inter-firm IT governance strategies on relational performance: The moderation effect of information technology ambidexterity , 2017, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[12]  Yi Wang,et al.  IT capability and organizational performance: the roles of business process agility and environmental factors , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Jeong-Yeon Lee,et al.  Cognitive Team Diversity and Individual Team Member Creativity: A Cross-Level Interaction , 2012 .

[14]  Felix C. Brodbeck,et al.  The regulatory power of standardized business processes , 2018, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[15]  Heeseok Lee,et al.  Knowledge Management Enablers, Processes, and Organizational Performance: An Integrative View and Empirical Examination , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Information system development agility as organizational learning , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[17]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Enabling innovation in the face of uncertainty through IT ambidexterity: A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis of industrial service SMEs , 2020, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[19]  Jianping Peng,et al.  Mediation effect of business process and supply chain management capabilities on the impact of IT on firm performance: Evidence from Chinese firms , 2016, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[20]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Performance of Coupled Product Development Activities with a Deadline , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[21]  Leon Mann,et al.  The Innovation Imperative , 2001 .

[22]  Jan vom Brocke,et al.  On the role of context in business process management , 2016, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[23]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[24]  Hans-Georg Gemünden,et al.  Interteam Coordination, Project Commitment, and Teamwork in Multiteam R&D Projects: A Longitudinal Study , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[25]  Daniel Beimborn,et al.  The impact of process standardization on business process outsourcing success , 2008, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[26]  Cheng Zhang,et al.  Effect of business process management on firm performance: An ambidexterity perspective , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Business Management and Electronic Information.

[27]  S. Fixson,et al.  The Power of Integrality: Linkages between Product Architecture, Innovation, and Industry Structure , 2007 .

[28]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  Task Environment Complexity, Global Team Dispersion, Process Capabilities, and Coordination in Software Development , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[29]  Andrew Sturdy,et al.  Management innovation through standardization: Consultants as standardizers of organizational practice , 2012 .

[30]  Dustin J. Sleesman,et al.  Coordinated action in multiteam systems. , 2012, The Journal of applied psychology.

[31]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[32]  Jay B. Carson,et al.  A Multilevel Investigation of Antecedents and Consequences of Team Member Boundary-Spanning Behavior , 2007 .

[33]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[34]  Zhaohua Deng,et al.  Information technology resource, knowledge management capability, and competitive advantage: The moderating role of resource commitment , 2016, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[35]  Abbas Tarhini,et al.  The role of ICT and innovation in enhancing organizational performance: The catalysing effect of corporate entrepreneurship , 2017, Journal of Business Research.

[36]  J. Barney,et al.  CAPABILITIES, BUSINESS PROCESSES, AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: CHOOSING THE DEPENDENT VARIABLE IN EMPIRICAL TESTS OF THE RESOURCE-BASED VIEW , 2004 .

[37]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Proposals for Future BPM Research Directions , 2014, AP-BPM.

[38]  Narayan Ramasubbu,et al.  How Information Management Capability Influences Firm Performance , 2011, MIS Q..

[39]  N. Joachim,et al.  The Role of Process Standardization in Achieving IT Business Value , 2009 .

[40]  Junyeong Lee,et al.  Share or send and receive? The impact of team knowledge outflow/inflow with IT support on performance , 2019, J. Knowl. Manag..

[41]  Varun Grover,et al.  Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms , 2003, MIS Q..

[42]  Heeseok Lee,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology and Transactive Memory Systems on Knowledge Sharing, Application, and Team Performance: A Field Study , 2010, MIS Q..

[43]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[44]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  The ERP Revolution: Surviving vs. Thriving , 2000, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[45]  Junyeong Lee,et al.  Setting a knowledge boundary across teams: knowledge protection regulation for inter-team coordination and team performance , 2017, J. Knowl. Manag..

[46]  Paul P. Tallon Inside the adaptive enterprise: an information technology capabilities perspective on business process agility , 2008, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[47]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  Ambidextrous coping strategies in globally distributed software development projects , 2006, CACM.

[48]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators , 2008 .

[49]  Jin Nam Choi Change‐oriented organizational citizenship behavior: effects of work environment characteristics and intervening psychological processes , 2007 .

[50]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  The Main and Interaction Effects of Process Rigor, Process Standardization, and Process Agility on System Performance in Distributed IS Development: An Ambidexterity Perspective , 2010, ICIS.

[51]  Kyle Lewis,et al.  Within- and Between-Team Coordination via Transactive Memory Systems and Boundary Spanning , 2018, Group & Organization Management.

[52]  Jin Nam Choi,et al.  Innovation implementation in the public sector: an integration of institutional and collective dynamics. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[53]  Ping Zhang,et al.  The Effects of Animation on Information Seeking Performance on the World Wide Web: Securing Attention or Interfering with Primary Tasks? , 2000, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[54]  Leslie A. DeChurch,et al.  Teamwork in multiteam systems. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[55]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries , 2002 .

[56]  S. Taggar Individual Creativity and Group Ability to Utilize Individual Creative Resources: A Multilevel Model , 2002 .

[57]  Paul P. Tallon,et al.  Competing Perspectives on the Link Between Strategic Information Technology Alignment and Organizational Agility: Insights from a Mediation Model , 2011, MIS Q..

[58]  Soo Wook Kim,et al.  Opening the technological innovation black box: The case of the electronics industry in Korea , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[59]  Alemayehu Molla,et al.  Enterprise Systems and Organizational Agility: A Review of the Literature and Conceptual Framework , 2012, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[60]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  The Effects of Process Orientations on Collaboration Technology Use and Outcomes in Product Development , 2017, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[61]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  Business agility and diffusion of information technology , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[62]  Jianxi Luo,et al.  Open Standards, Vertical Disintegration and Entrepreneurial Opportunities: How Vertically Specialised Firms Entered the U.S. Semiconductor Industry , 2015 .

[63]  Jin Nam Choi,et al.  Contextual Inhibitors of Employee Creativity in Organizations , 2009 .

[64]  Jeong-Yeon Lee,et al.  Transformational Leadership and Inter-Team Collaboration , 2015 .

[65]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  The Six Core Elements of Business Process Management , 2015 .

[66]  Robyn L. Raschke Process-based view of agility: The value contribution of IT and the effects on process outcomes , 2010, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[67]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[68]  Peter Trkman,et al.  International Journal of Information Management , 2022 .

[69]  Debra L. Shapiro,et al.  Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. , 2001 .

[70]  Alexander Kock,et al.  Top Management Team Diversity and Strategic Innovation Orientation: The Relationship and Consequences for Innovativeness and Performance , 2011 .

[71]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[72]  Knut Blind,et al.  ISO 9001 and product innovation: A literature review and research framework , 2016 .

[73]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  The role of IT application orchestration capability in improving agility and performance , 2017, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[74]  Russell Torres,et al.  The Role of Information Technology in Business Process Management , 2015, Handbook on Business Process Management.

[75]  Rajesh Sethi New Product Quality and Product Development Teams , 2000 .

[76]  Roger Tregear Business Process Standardization , 2015, Handbook on Business Process Management.

[77]  Peter Essens,et al.  Antecedents of individuals' interteam coordination: Broad functional experiences as a mixed blessing , 2014 .

[78]  Varun Grover,et al.  Business Value of IT: An Essay on Expanding Research Directions to Keep up with the Times , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[79]  Amy C. Edmondson,et al.  The Local and Variegated Nature of Learning in Organizations: A Group-Level Perspective , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[80]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  Strategic IT alignment: twenty-five years on , 2015, J. Inf. Technol..