The Role of Automatic, Bottom-Up Processes: In the Ubiquitous Patterns of Incorrect Answers to Science Questions

[1]  J. Piaget.  The Language and Thought of the Child , 1927 .

[2]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[3]  U. Neisser.  The multiplicity of thought. , 1963, British journal of psychology.

[4]  G. Bower,et al.  Attention in Learning: Theory and Research , 1968 .

[5]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Origins of Intelligence in Children , 1971 .

[6]  J. Piaget.  Psychology and Epistemology: Towards a Theory of Knowledge , 1972 .

[7]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[8]  N. Mackintosh.  A Theory of Attention: Variations in the Associability of Stimuli with Reinforcement , 1975 .

[9]  R. Siegler.  Three aspects of cognitive development , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  John F. Schmerler.  The Visual Perception of Accelerated Motion , 1976, Perception.

[11]  N. Mackintosh,et al.  Loss of control by a less valid or by a less salient stimulus compounded with a better predictor of reinforcement , 1977 .

[12]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[13]  R. Driver,et al.  Pupils and Paradigms: a Review of Literature Related to Concept Development in Adolescent Science Students , 1978 .

[14]  L. Viennot.  Spontaneous Reasoning in Elementary Dynamics. , 1979 .

[15]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces: naive beliefs about the motion of objects. , 1980, Science.

[16]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[17]  R. Siegler.  Developmental Sequences within and between Concepts. , 1981 .

[18]  M. McCloskey.  Naive Theories of Motion. , 1982 .

[19]  J. Clement.  Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics , 1982 .

[20]  R. Driver,et al.  Theories-in-Action: Some Theoretical and Empirical Issues in the Study of Students' Conceptual Frameworks in Science , 1983 .

[21]  Roger Osborne,et al.  Children's conceptions of the changes of state of water , 1983 .

[22]  P. Johnson-Laird.  Mental models , 1989 .

[23]  Dennis R. Proffitt,et al.  Judgments of natural and anomalous trajectories in the presence and absence of motion. , 1985 .

[24]  Ibrahim A. Halloun,et al.  Common sense concepts about motion , 1985 .

[25]  S. Carey.  Conceptual Change in Childhood , 1985 .

[26]  J. Jonides,et al.  Intuitive reasoning about abstract and familiar physics problems , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[27]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  Student difficulties in connecting graphs and physics: Examples from kinematics , 1987 .

[28]  J. Mokros,et al.  The impact of microcomputer‐based labs on children's ability to interpret graphs , 1987 .

[29]  J. Freyd.  Dynamic mental representations. , 1987, Psychological review.

[30]  L. Vygotsky.  Thinking and Speech , 1987 .

[31]  Reinders Duit,et al.  Bibliography. Students' Alternative Frameworks and Science Education. 2nd Edition. , 1988 .

[32]  Colin M. Macleod,et al.  Training and Stroop-like interference: evidence for a continuum of automaticity. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. , 1990, Psychological review.

[34]  Colin M. Macleod.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[35]  Geoffrey Hall.  Perceptual and associative learning , 1991 .

[36]  H. Hecht,et al.  Influence of animation on dynamical judgments. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  S. Edgell,et al.  15 The Effects of Representation on the Processing of Probabilistic Information , 1992 .

[38]  H. Wellman,et al.  Cognitive development: foundational theories of core domains. , 1992, Annual review of psychology.

[39]  W. Brewer,et al.  Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[40]  Jennifer J. Freyd,et al.  Dynamic Representations Guiding Adaptive Behavior , 1992 .

[41]  Françoise Macar,et al.  Time, action, and cognition : towards bridging the gap , 1992 .

[42]  D. Hestenes,et al.  Force concept inventory , 1992 .

[43]  A. Reber.  Implicit learning and tacit knowledge , 1993 .

[44]  A. diSessa.  Toward an Epistemology of Physics , 1993 .

[45]  P. Scott,et al.  Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom , 1994 .

[46]  Robert J. Beichner,et al.  Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs , 1994 .

[47]  J. Roschelle,et al.  Misconceptions Reconceived: A Constructivist Analysis of Knowledge in Transition , 1994 .

[48]  Jim Garrison,et al.  Realism, Deweyan Pragmatism, and Educational Research , 1994 .

[49]  J. Freyd,et al.  Representational momentum for a spiral path. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[50]  M. Chi,et al.  From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts , 1994 .

[51]  S. Vosniadou.  Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. , 1994 .

[52]  T. Hubbard,et al.  Environmental invariants in the representation of motion: Implied dynamics and representational momentum, gravity, friction, and centripetal force , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[53]  David Hammer,et al.  Misconceptions or P-Prims: How May Alternative Perspectives of Cognitive Structure Influence Instructional Perceptions and Intentions , 1996 .

[54]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Naming in young children: a dumb attentional mechanism? , 1996, Cognition.

[55]  S. Vosniadou.  TOWARDS A REVISED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY FOR NEW ADVANCES IN LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION , 1996 .

[56]  David Hammer,et al.  More than misconceptions: Multiple perspectives on student knowledge and reasoning, and an appropriate role for education research , 1996 .

[57]  S. Sloman.  The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[58]  E. Spelke,et al.  Science and Core Knowledge , 1996, Philosophy of Science.

[59]  G Gigerenzer,et al.  Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. , 1996, Psychological review.

[60]  S. Yantis,et al.  Visual attention: control, representation, and time course. , 1997, Annual review of psychology.

[61]  Deborah L. Schnipke,et al.  Modeling Item Response Times With a Two-State Mixture Model: A New Method of Measuring , 1997 .

[62]  A. diSessa,et al.  What changes in conceptual change , 1998 .

[63]  Alwyn C. Scott,et al.  Toward a Science of Consciousness II: The 1996 Tucson Discussions and Debates , 1998 .

[64]  Alwyn C. Scott,et al.  Toward a Science of Consciousness II , 1998 .

[65]  R. Siegler,et al.  Conscious and unconscious strategy discoveries: a microgenetic analysis. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[66]  L. McDermott,et al.  Resource Letter: PER-1: Physics Education Research , 1999 .

[67]  J. Kruschke,et al.  A model of probabilistic category learning. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[68]  K. Cave,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up attentional control: On the nature of interference from a salient distractor , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[69]  Ruth Stavy,et al.  How Students Mis/Understand Science and Mathematics: Intuitive Rules (Ways of Knowing in Science Series) , 2000 .

[70]  Andrew Elby,et al.  What students' learning of representations tells us about constructivism , 2000 .

[71]  David Hammer,et al.  Student resources for learning introductory physics , 2000 .

[72]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[73]  M. Chi,et al.  Naive Physics Reasoning: A Commitment to Substance-Based Conceptions , 2000 .

[74]  R. Dolan,et al.  Dissociation of Mechanisms Underlying Syllogistic Reasoning , 2000, NeuroImage.

[75]  M. Hegarty,et al.  Impetus beliefs as default heuristics: Dissociation between explicit and implicit knowledge about motion , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[76]  David P Maloney,et al.  Surveying students’ conceptual knowledge of electricity and magnetism , 2001 .

[77]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  Oersted Medal Lecture 2001: “Physics Education Research—The Key to Student Learning” , 2001 .

[78]  Andrew Elby.  Helping physics students learn how to learn , 2001 .

[79]  J. Kruschke.  Toward a unified model of attention in associative learning , 2001 .

[80]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  Physics education research: the key to student learning , 2001 .

[81]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. , 2002 .

[82]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment , 2002 .

[83]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners , 2002 .

[84]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Models of ecological rationality: the recognition heuristic. , 2002, Psychological review.

[85]  Yehoshua Tsal,et al.  Does a salient distractor capture attention early in processing? , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[86]  Andrew Elby,et al.  Tapping Epistemological Resources for Learning Physics , 2003 .

[87]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Competition among multiple memory systems: converging evidence from animal and human brain studies , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[88]  Ian Dennis,et al.  Explicit and implicit processes in multicue judgment , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[89]  D. Kahneman.  A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[90]  P. Scott,et al.  Individual and Sociocultural Views of Learning in Science Education , 2003 .

[91]  Wim J. Linden,et al.  Using response times to detect aberrant responses in computerized adaptive testing , 2003 .

[92]  R. Engle,et al.  Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[93]  Jonathan Evans.  In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[94]  D. Rohrer.  The natural appearance of unnatural incline speed , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[95]  Jennifer B. Esterly,et al.  Coherence versus fragmentation in the development of the concept of force , 2004 .

[96]  A. Glöckner,et al.  Oops, I did it again--relapse errors in routinized decision making , 2004 .

[97]  Brent Bridgeman,et al.  Effect of Extra Time on Verbal and Quantitative GRE Scores , 2004 .

[98]  S. Carey.  The Origin of Concepts , 2000 .

[99]  W. T. Maddox,et al.  Dissociating explicit and procedural-learning based systems of perceptual category learning , 2004, Behavioural Processes.

[100]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Commonsense Conceptions of Emergent Processes: Why Some Misconceptions Are Robust , 2005 .

[101]  Aaron B. Hoffman,et al.  Eyetracking and selective attention in category learning , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[102]  J. Mestre.  Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective , 2005 .

[103]  Timothy Salthouse,et al.  A psychometric approach to intuitive physics , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[104]  Crystal D. Oberle,et al.  The Galileo bias: a naive conceptual belief that influences people's perceptions and performance in a ball-dropping task. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[105]  W. T. Maddox,et al.  Dual-task interference in perceptual category learning , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[106]  Wim De Neys,et al.  Dual Processing in Reasoning , 2006, Psychological science.

[107]  Yuko Munakata,et al.  When Actions Speak Louder Than Words , 2006, Psychological science.

[108]  Robert J. Beichner,et al.  Evaluating an electricity and magnetism assessment tool: Brief electricity and magnetism assessment , 2006 .

[109]  Lei Bao,et al.  Model Analysis: Representing and Assessing the Dynamics of Student Learning. , 2006 .

[110]  Heidi Kloos,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article When Looks Are Everything Appearance Similarity Versus Kind Information in Early Induction , 2022 .

[111]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Spatial Visualization in Physics Problem Solving , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[112]  Edward F. Redish,et al.  Knowledge organization and activation in physics problem solving , 2007 .

[113]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  A response-time approach to comparing generalized rational and take-the-best models of decision making. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[114]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Overcoming intuition: metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[115]  V. Sloutsky,et al.  What's behind different kinds of kinds: effects of statistical density on learning and representation of categories. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[116]  Willem J. van der Linden,et al.  Using Response Times for Item Selection in Adaptive Testing , 2008 .

[117]  Jonathan Evans.  Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[118]  Jon R Courtney,et al.  Spatial Memory and Explicit Knowledge: An Effect of Instruction on Representational Momentum , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[119]  Jennifer A. Kaminski,et al.  Learning Associations That Run Counter to Biases in Learning: Overcoming Overshadowing and Learned Inattention , 2008 .

[120]  Andreas Glöckner,et al.  Modeling Option and Strategy Choices with Connectionist Networks: Towards an Integrative Model of Automatic and Deliberate Decision Making , 2008, Judgment and Decision Making.

[121]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Why Heuristics Work , 2008, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[122]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Homo Heuristicus: Why Biased Minds Make Better Inferences , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[123]  S. Gelman.  Learning from others: children's construction of concepts. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[124]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  The Education of Perception , 2010, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[125]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Effects of knowledge and display design on comprehension of complex graphics , 2010 .

[126]  T. Gog,et al.  In the eyes of the beholder: How experts and novices interpret dynamic stimuli , 2010 .

[127]  Andrew F. Heckler,et al.  Some Consequences of Prompting Novice Physics Students to Construct Force Diagrams , 2010 .

[128]  Richard K. Lowe,et al.  An Eye Tracking Comparison of External Pointing Cues and Internal Continuous Cues in Learning with Complex Animations , 2010 .

[129]  R. Catrambone,et al.  Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 2010 .

[130]  Ayush Gupta,et al.  The Case for Dynamic Models of Learners' Ontologies in Physics , 2010 .

[131]  Andrew F. Heckler,et al.  Response Times and Misconception-like Responses to Science Questions , 2010 .

[132]  Ji Y. Son,et al.  Perceptual Learning Modules in Mathematics: Enhancing Students' Pattern Recognition, Structure Extraction, and Fluency , 2010, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[133]  Frank C. Keil,et al.  The Feasibility of Folk Science , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[134]  W. James.  The principles of psychology , 1983 .